Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

EFFECTS OF COMPUTER SIMULATIONS PROGRAMS ON UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ ACHIEVMENTS IN PHYSICS

Journal Name:

  • The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education

Publication Year:

  • 2008

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The present study investigated whether computer assisted instruction was more effective than face-to-face instruction in increasing student success in physics. The study was conducted in the spring semester of 2006 at the Department of Science and Mathematics for Secondary Education at Hacettepe University. Seventy-eight freshman students from the Divisions of Biology Education and Chemistry Education participated in the quantitative study which included a pre-test/post-test control group design. The experimental group consisted of students from the Division of Biology Education while the control group consisted of students from the Division of Chemistry Education. Experiment and control groups were randomly selected. The subject of geometric optic covered in Physics II Course was provided through a simulation program called Pearls 3.0 to the experiment group, whereas the control group had the same instruction through face-to-face teaching methods. An achievement test addressing the contents of the geometric optic subject was prepared, which had an internal consistency coefficient of .73. Data obtained through the achievement test were analyzed through conducting t-tests with SPSS 11.0 for Windows. Findings revealed that the experimental group which had the instruction through the computer simulation was more successful than the control group who had face-to-face instruction.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-effects-computer-simulations-programs-university-students-achievments-physics.pdf
  • 4
53-62
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Akgun, S. (2000). Science Instruction to Pre-Service Teachers. Ankara: Pegem A
Yayincilik.
Chang, C. Y. (2002). Does- computer-assisted instruction+problem solving= improved
science outcomes? A pioneer study. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(3), 143-
150.
Cotton, K. (1991). Computer-Assisted Iınstruction. School Improvement Research Series.
Retrieved January, 1 2008, http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/5/cu10.html.
Cekbas, Y., Yakar, H., Yildirim, B. & Savran, A. (2003). Effect of Computer Assisted
Instruction on Students). The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technolagy (TOJET),
ISSN:1303-6521:2:4, Article 11.
Cildir, I. (2005). Idenfication of High School Students’ Misconception About Electric
Current by Concept Maps. Hacettepe University, Master’s dissertation.
Hacker, R. G, & Sova, B. (1998). Initial Teacher Education: A Study of the Efficacy of
Computer Mediated Courseware Delivery in a Partnership Concept. British Journal of
Education Technology, 29 (4), 333–341.
Gonen, S. & Kocakaya, S. (2005). Comparison of Attitudes Towards Physics and
Computer attitudes in High School First Graders According to two Different Instructional
Methods). Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17.
Senturk, A. (2005). Computer Applications in Instruction and CBI. (Instructional
Technologies and Materials Development)(p. 115–126). Ankara: Öğreti, PagemA
Yayincilik
62
Usun, S. (2004). Fundamentals of Computer Assisted Instruction). Ankara: Nobel Yayin
Dağıtım.
Yenice, N. (2003). Effect of Computer Assisted Science Instruction on Attitudes Towards
Computers and Science). The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technolagy (TOJET)
ISSN: 1303–6521: 2;4, Article 12.
Yigit, N. (2004). Effect of Computer Based Applications on Achievement in Physics
Instruction). Milli Eğitim. Sayı 161.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com