Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

A Study on a Group of Indian English as a Second Language Learners’ Perceptions of Autonomous Learning

Journal Name:

  • Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Learner autonomy has been one of the most popular terms in the language learning field lately. Researchers have been conducting studies to see different aspects of learner autonomy and to bring different suggestions to teachers to promote autonomous learning in their classrooms. Students of a particular cultural background would not show the same level of readiness for learner autonomy as the students of another culture. Cultural and educational settings of the instruction affect how the teachers and students perceive the concept of learner autonomy, and these differences in perception obviously affect how the ways to promote learner autonomy work. As the perception and realization of learner autonomy changes depending on the cultural background, it is important to see the autonomy-related perspectives of different learners and teachers around the world. Thus, aiming to contribute the relevant literature from this standpoint, the main aim of this study was to explore four Indian English as a second language (ESL) learners‟ perceptions related to teacher and learner responsibilities in the language learning process and to get an idea of how ESL students in the Indian educational context perceive the concepts related to learner independence. Three interview sessions were conducted with the participants in order to reach the aim of the study. The data were analyzed according to three main categories: (a) aspects of language learning for which the participants saw the teacher as the most responsible figure in the classroom; (b) aspects of learning for which the participants considered students to be more responsible; (c) aspects that both the teacher and the students share equal responsibility. It was hoped that the results of the study would provide guidance to teachers and researchers, especially the ones working with multicultural student groups, to understand the effects of culture on the interpretation of concepts related to learner autonomy.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-study-group-indian-english-second-language-learners-perceptions-autonomous-learning.pdf
  • 2
18
29
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Adamson, J. (2004). Investigating college student attitudes towards learning English and their learning strategies: Insights from interviews in Thailand. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 1, 47-70.
Balçıkanlı, C. (2006). Promoting learner autonomy through activities at Gazi University preparatory school. Unpublished M.A. Thesis submitted to Gazi University, Ankara.
Baylan, S. (2007). University students‟ and their teachers‟ perceptions and expectations of learner autonomy in EFL prep classes. Unpublished M.A. Thesis submitted to Marmara University, İstanbul.
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning. London: Longman.
Bullock, D. (2011). Learner self-assessment: an investigation into teachers‟ beliefs. ELT Journal, 65(2), 114-125.
Chan, V. (2001). Readiness for learner autonomy: what do our learners tell us?. Teaching In Higher Education, 6(4), 505-518.
Chan, V. (2003). Autonomous Language Learning: the teachers‟ perspectives. Teaching In Higher Education, 8(1), 33-54.
Cotterall, S. (1995). Readiness for autonomy: investigating learner beliefs. System, 23(2), 195-206.
Cotterall, S. (1999). Key variables in language learning: what do learners believe about them?. System, 27(4), 493-513.
Ellis, G., & Sinclair, B. (1989). Learning to learn English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, April 2012, 3(2)
29
Gökgöz, B. (2008). An investigation of learner autonomy and strategies coping with speaking problems in relation to success in English speaking classes. Unpublished M.A. Thesis submitted to Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
Gremmo, M. J., & Riley, P. (1995). Autonomy, self-direction and self-access in language teaching and learning: the history of an idea. System, 23, (2), 151-164.
Ho, J., & Crookall, D. (1995). Breaking with Chinese cultural traditions: Learner autonomy in English language teaching. System, 23(2), 235-243.
Holliday, A. (2003). Social autonomy: Addressing the dangers of culturism in TESOL. In D. Palfreyman and R. C. Smith (Eds.). Learner Autonomy Across Cultures: Language Education Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan. (pp. 110-126).
Kenny, B. (1993). For More Autonomy. System, 21(4), 431-442.
Kubota, R. (2002). The author responds: (Un)raveling racism in a nice field like TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 84-92.
Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: the dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175-181.
Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 71-94.
Scharle, A., & Szabo, A. (2000). Learner autonomy: a guide to developing learner responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as Qualitative Research, A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
Sert, N. (2006). EFL student teachers‟ learning autonomy. Asian EFL Journal, 8(2), 180-201.
Spratt, M., Humphreys, G., & Chan, V. (2002). Autonomy and motivation: which comes first?. Language Teaching Research, 6(3), 245-266.
Üstünoğlu, E. (2009). Autonomy in language learning: Do students take responsibility for their learning. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 5(2), 148-169.
Yıldırım, O. (2008a). Pre-service English teachers‟ views of teacher and student responsibilitiesin the foreign language classroom. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 33, 211-226.
Yıldırım, O. (2008b). Turkish EFL learners‟ readiness for learner autonomy. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 4(1), 65-80.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com