Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Aile hekimliği ve kronik hastalık bakım modeli

Family practice and chronic care model

Journal Name:

  • Türkiye Aile Hekimliği Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010
DOI: 
doi:10.2399/tahd.10.032

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Prevention, treatment and rehabilitation of chronic diseases are important components of a family physician's practice. However, it is known that there are several problems regarding chronic care management. There is reasonably high percentage of undiagnosed chronic diseases in the community and a high percentage of diag¬nosed patients do not reach treatment targets. "Chronic care model" developed by Ed Wagner et al, aims to have better man¬agement of chronic diseases by using strategies, targets and protocols. This model includes 6 components: community linkages, heath care delivery system, self-management support, delivery system design, decision support and clinical information systems. This review deals with Chronic Care Model and presents evidence of efficacy when applied to primary care. Recent evidence supports that by implementing this model, improvements in parameters related with clinical practice and patient outcomes can be achieved.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Kronik hastalıklara yönelik korunma, tedavi ve rehabilitasyon süreçleri aile hekimliği pratiğinin önemli bir parçasıdır. Ancak kronik hastalıkların yönetiminde önemli sorunların olduğu bilinmektedir: Toplumda, kronik hastaların önemli bir bölümüne tanı konmamış, tanı konmuş olanların da önemli bir bölümünde tedavi hedeflerine ulaşılamamıştır. Ed Wagner ve arkadaşlarının geliştirdiği "kronik hastalık bakım modeli" strateji, hedef ve protokoller ile kronik hastalıkların daha iyi yönetilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Model 6 bileşenden oluşur; toplumsal kaynaklar ve politikalar, sağlık sisteminin organizasyonu, kendi kendine bakım desteği, hizmet sunum şekli, karar desteği ve klinik bilgi sistemleri. Bu derleme kronik hasta¬lık bakım modelini ele almakta ve birinci basamaktaki etkinliğine yönelik kanıtları sunmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_116859_14_pp_32-37.pdf
  • 1
32-37
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Sipkoff M. Health plans begin to address chronic care management. Manag Care 2003; 12: 24-31.
2.
Topall
ı R, Aladağ N, Filiz TM, Topsever P, Ciğerli Ö, Görpelioğlu S. Tıp Fakültesi Aile Hekimliği polikliniklerinin sağlık hizmeti sunumunda-ki yeri: Değirmendere deneyimi. Türk Aile Hek Derg 2003; 7: 165-70.
3. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington DC, National Academy Press,
2001: 1-2.
4. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J ve ark. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2635-45.
5. Schmittdiel JA, Shortell SM, Rundall TG, Bodenheimer T, Selby JV. Effect of Primary Health Care Orientation on Chronic Care Management. Ann Fam Med 2006; 4: 117-23.
6. Altun B, Arici M, Nergizoğlu G ve ark. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Turkey (the PatenT study) in 2003. J
Hypertens2005; 23: 1817-23.
7. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR ve ark. Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003; 42: 1206-52.
8. Houlihan SJ, Simpson SH, Cave AJ ve ark.Hypertension treatment and control rates: chart review in an academic family medicine clinic. Can Fam Physician 2009; 55: 735-41.
9.
Soyda
n I. Hipertansiyon ile İlgili Tekharf Çalışması Verileri ve Yorumu. http://tekharf.org/images/bolum5.pdf adresinden 10/07/2009 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
10. IDF Clinical Guidelines Task Force. Global guideline for Type 2 dia¬betes. Brussels, International Diabetes Federation, 2005; 9.
11. Moore GL. Escaping the Tyranny of the Urgent by Delivering Planned Care. Family Practice Management 2006; 13: 37-40.
12. Bodenheimer T, Wagner ED, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for
patients with chronic illness. JAMA2002; 288: 1775-9.
13. Ostbye T, Yarnall KSH, Krause KM ve ark. Is There Time for Management of Patients With Chronic Diseases in Primary Care? Ann
Fam Med2005; 3: 209-14.
14. Drotar D. Physician behavior in the care of pediatric chronic illness: asso¬ciation with health outcomes and treatment adherence. J Dev Behav
Pediatr 2009; 30: 246-54.
15. Feifer C, Ornstein SM, Jenkins RG ve ark. Logic behind a multimethod intervention to improve adherence to clinical practice guidelines in a nationwide network of primary care practices. Eval Health Prof 2006; 29:
65-88.
16. Unalan P, Cifcili S, Uzuner A, Akman M. Hastaların Hipertansiyon ve Antihipertansifler Konusundaki Algı ve İnanışları. Türk Aile Hek Derg
2005; 9: 153-8.
17. Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T. A primary care home for Americans: put¬ting the house in order. JAMA 2002; 288: 889-93.
18. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the Chronic Care Model, Part 2. JAMA
2002; 288: 1909-14.
19. Rothman AA, Wagner EH. Chronic Illness Management: What is the role of primary care? Ann Intern Med2003; 138: 256-61.
20. Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff Clin Pract 1998: 1: 2-4.
21. Szecsenyi J, Rosemann T, Joos S, Peters-Klimm F, Miksch A. German diabetes disease management programs are appropriate to restructure care according to the Chronic Care Model. An evaluation with the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-5A) instrument. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 1150-4.
22. Steuten
L
, Vrijhoef B, Van Merode F, Weeseling G-J, Spreeuwenberg C. Evaluation of a regional disease management programme for patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2006: 18: 429-36.
23.
Vrijhoe
f HJM, Spreeuwenberg C, Eijkelberg IMJG, Wolffenbuttel BHR, Van Merode GG. Adoption of disease management model for diabetes in
region of Maastricht. BMJ2001: 323: 983-5.
24. Ouwens M, Wollersheim H, Hermens R, Hulscher M, Grol R. Integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients: a review of sys¬tematic reviews. Int J Qual Health Care 2005: 17: 141-6.
25. Mohler PJ, Mohler NB. Improving chronic illness care: lessons learned in a private practice. Family Practice Management 2005; 11: 50-6.
26. Bodenheimer T, Grumbach K. Kronik hastalığı olan hastalara sunulan birinci basamak hizmetin iyileştirilmesi. Birinci Basamağın İyileştirilmesi: Daha İyi Uygulamalar İçin Stratejiler ve Araçlar'da. Çeviri Ed. Bozdemir
N. Saatçi E. Adana, Nobel Kitabevi, 2009; 55-77.
27. Smith H. The Continuing Care Model in Pregnancy and Infancy. http://www.improvingchroniccare.org/index.php?p=CCM_Gallery&s=1 49 adresinden 10/07/2009 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
28. Barr VJ, Robinson S, Marin-Link B ve ark. The expanded Chronic Care Model: an integration of concepts and strategies from population health promotion and the Chronic Care Model. Hosp Q 2003; 7: 73-82.
29. Coleman K, Austin BT, Brach C, Wagner EH. Evidence on the Chronic
Care Model in the new millennium. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009; 28: 75¬85.
30. Piatt GA, Orchard TJ, Emerson S ve ark. Translating the chronic care model into the community: results from a randomized controlled trial of a multifaceted diabetes care intervention. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 811-7.
31. Solberg LI, Crain AL, Sperl-Hillen JM ve ark. Care quality and imple¬mentation of the chronic care model: a quantitative study. Ann Fam Med
2006; 4: 310-6.
32. Hung DY, Glasgow RE, Dickinson LM ve ark. The chronic care model and relationships to patient health status and health-related quality of life. Am J Prev Med 2008; 35(5 Suppl): S398-406.
33. Hroscikoski MC, Solberg LI, Sperl-Hillen JM, Harper PG, McGrail MP,
Crabtree BF. Challenges of change: a qualitative study of chronic care model implementation. Ann Fam Med2006; 4: 317-26.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com