Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

ARDIŞIK ZAMANLI KESİKLİ BİYO-REAKTÖRDE NUTRİENT GİDERME PERFORMANSINA ÇAMUR YAŞININ ETKİLERİ

Effects of Sludge Age on Nutrient Removal Performance in a Sequencing Batch Reactor

Journal Name:

  • Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2004

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Nutrient removal from synthetic wastewater by sequencing batch operation was studied at different solids retention times (SRT). The nutrient removal process was consisted of anaerobic, anoxic I, oxic I, anoxic II, oxic II and settling phases. Hydraulic residence times (HRT) of the aforementioned phases were kept constant at 2/ 1/ 4.5/1.5/1.5 hours. Settling phase was ½ hours for all experiments. Solids retention time was varied between 5 to 30 days at six different levels. Effects of solids retention time (sludge age) on COD, nitrogen (NH4-N, NO3-N) and phosphate (PO4-P) removal were investigated and the optimal sludge age resulting in maximum nutrient removal efficiency was determined. The highest COD (94%), NH4-N (84%) and PO4-P (70%) removal efficiencies were obtained at the sludge age of 10 days, although a sludge age of 15 days resulted in slightly lower values. Sludge ages larger than 15 days resulted in lower nutrient removal efficiencies as compared to those obtained at 10 or 15 days of sludge age. Sludge volume index (SVI) was also minimum (55 ml/g) at sludge age of 10 days. MLSS concentration increased with sludge age resulting in MLSS concentration of 3760 mg/l at SRT of 30 days. On the basis of these results, a sludge age of 10 days was found to be optimal resulting in maximum nutrient removal efficiencies and minimum sludge volume index.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Ardışık zamanlı işletme ile sentetik atıksudan nutrient giderimi farklı çamur yaşlarında çalışılmıştır. Nutrient giderme prosesi anaerobik, anoksik I, oksik I, anoksik II, oksik II ve çökeltme fazlarından oluşmaktadır. Hidrolik alıkonma süreleri sırasıyla 2/ 1/ 4,5/ 1,5/ 1,5 saat olarak sabit tutulmuştur. Çökeltme süresi tüm deneylerde ½ saattir. Çamur yaşı 5 ile 30 gün arasında altı farklı durumda değiştirilmiştir. KOİ, azot (NH4-N, NO3-N) ve fosfat (PO4-P) giderimi üzerine çamur yaşının etkileri incelendi ve maksimum nutrient giderme verimiyle sonuçlanan optimum çamur yaşı hesaplanmıştır. 15 günlük çamur yaşı önemsiz daha düşük değerlerle sonuçlanmasına rağmen, en yüksek KOİ (%94), NH4-N (%84) ve PO4-P (%70) giderme verimleri 10 günlük çamur yaşında elde edilmiştir. 15 günlük çamur yaşından daha büyük çamur yaşlarında, 10 veya 15 günlük çamur yaşında elde edilen nutrient giderme verimleriyle karşılaştırıldığında daha düşük nutrient giderme verimleriyle sonuçlanmıştır. Çamur hacim indeksi (ÇHİ) 10 günlük çamur yaşında minimum 55 ml/g’dır. Bioyokütle (MLSS) konsantrasyonu, 30 günlük çamur yaşında 3760 mg/l değeriyle sonuçlanarak çamur yaşıyla yükselmiştir. Bu sonuçların ışığında, maksimum nutrient giderme verimleri ve minimum çamur hacim indeksiyle sonuçlanan 10 günlük çamur yaşı optimum olarak bulunmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ardisik-zamanli-kesikli-biyo-reaktorde-nutrient-giderme-performansina-camur-yasinin-etkileri.pdf
  • 1
153-160
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. TASLI R, ARTAN N, ORHON, D.: The influence of different substrates on enhanced biological phosphorus
removal in a sequencing batch reactor. Wat.Sci.Tech.; 35: 75-80, 1997.
2. BAOZHEN, W., JUN L, LIN W., MEISHENG N & JI L.: Mechanism of phosphorus removal by SBR submerged
biofilm system. Wat. Res.; 32: 2633-2638, 1998.
3. RAMIREZ,C.N. & MARTINEZ, S. G.: Phosphorus uptake kinetics in a biofilm sequenceing batch reactor.
Bioprocess Eng., 23: 143-147, 2000.
4. BELIA, E. & SMITH, P.G.: The bioaugmentation of sequencing batch reactor sludges for biological phosphorus
removal. Wat. Sci. Tech.; 35: 19-26, 1997.
5. SHIN, H.S. & JUN, H.B.: Developments of excess phosphorus removal characteristics in a sequencing batch
reactor. Wat. Sci. Tech. 25: 443-440, 1992.
6. DANESH, S. & OLESZKIEWICZ, J.A.: Use of a new anaerobic-aerobic sequencing batch reactor system to
enhance biological phosphorus removal. Wat. Sci. Tech., 35: 137-144, 1997.
7. CARUCCI A, MAJONE M, RAMADORI R & ROSETTI S.: Biological phosphorus removal with different
organic substrates in an anaerobic/aerobic sequencing batch reactor. Wat.Sci.Tech. 35: 161-187, 1997.
8. COLUNGA, AM & MARTINEZ, SG.: Effects of population displacements on biological phosphorus removal in
a biofilm SBR Wat. Sci. Tech., 34: 303-313, 1996.
9. COLMENAREJO, M.F., BUSTOS, A., GARCIA, M.G., BORJA, R., BANKS, C.J.:An analysis of the factors that
influence biological phosphorus removal (BPR) in a sequencing batch anaerobic/aerobic reactor. Bioprocess
Engineering, 19: 171-174, 1998.
10. METCALF & EDDY, Wastewater Engineering:Treatment, Disposal,Reuse.Third edn., McGraw Hill, USA, 1991.
11. ARORA, M. L., BARTH, E.F & UMPHRES, M. B.: Technology evaluation of sequencing batch reactors J. Wat.
Poll. Cont. Fed. 57: 867-875., 1985.
12. UMBLE A K & KETCHUM, AL.: A strategy for coupling municipal wastewater treatment using the sequencing
batch reactor with effluent nutrient recovery through aquaculture. Wat. Sci. Tech; 35: 177-184,. 1997.
13. CHANG, C H & HAO, O J.: Sequencing batch reactor system for nutrient removal: ORP and pH profiles. J.
Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 67: 27-38., 1996.
14. PASTORELLI, G., CANZIANI, R., PEDRAZZI, L. & ROZZI, A.: Phosphorus and nitrogen removal in movingbed
sequencing batch biofilm reactor. Wat. Sci. Tech. 40: 169-176, 1999.
15. FURUMAI H., KAZMI, A.A., FUJITA, M., FURUYA, Y. & SASAKI, K.: Modeling long term nutrient removal
in a sequencing batch reactor. Wat. Res. 33: 2708-2714, 1999.
16. KELLER, J., SUBRAMANIAM, K., GÖSSWEIN, J. & GREENFIELD, P.: Nutrient removal from industrial
wastewater using single tank sequencing batch reactors. Wat. Sci. Tech. 35: 137-144, 1997.
17. SUBRAMANIAM K., GREENFIELD P.F., HO K. M., JOHNS, M.R., KELLER J.: Efficient biological nutrient
removal in high strength wastewater using combined anaerobic-sequencing batch reactor treatment. Wat. Sci.
Tech. 30: 315-321, 1994.
18. DEMOULIN, G., GORONSZY, I.C., WUTSCHER, K.& FORSTHUBER, E.: Co-current
nitrification/denitrification and biological P-removal in cyclic activated sludge plants by redox controlled cycle
operation, Wat. Sci. Tech. 35: 215-224, 1997.
19. ANDREOTTOLA G, BORTONE G & TILCHE A.: Experimental validation of a simulation and design model for
nitrogen removal in sequencing batch reactors. Wat. Sci. Tech. 35: 113-120, 1997.
20. HO N C, RA K M, BYUNG G P, SEONG-JIN L, DONG W C, WOO G L, SEOK L S & YONG H A.: Simulation
of sequential batch reactor (SBR) operation for simultaneous removal of nitrogen and phosphorus. Bioprocess
Eng. 23: 513-521, 2000.
21. ZUNIGA, M.A. G. AND MARTINEZ S. G.: Biological phosphate and nitrogen removal in a biofilm sequencing
batch reactor. Wat. Sci. Tech. 34: 293-301, 1996.
22. SANG-ILL L, JONG-HO P, KWANG-BAIK K, BEN K.: Effect of fermented swine wastes on biological nutrient
removal in sequencing batch reactors.Wat. Res.31: 1807-1812, 1997.
23. American Public Health Association (APHA) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,
17th edn. Washington, DC, 1998.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com