Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Konjenital VSD’lerin Cerrahi Tedavisinde Kullanılan Otolog Perikart Yama İle Sentetik Yama Materyallerin Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırılması

Comparison of Material Results of Autologous Pericardial and Synthetic Patches Used For Surgical Treatment of Congenital VDS’s

Journal Name:

  • Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of the study was to compare the results of pericardial and synthetic patches in isolated VSD cases that are operated. In the retrospective study, total of 90 patient files were examined, 40 of them being women (44.44%), and 50 being men (%55.56) who were operated. Pericardial patches were used for 32 patients (35.56%), and synthetic patches were used for 58 patients (64.44%). 25 of the cases (27.78%) were perimembranous, 16 of them (17.78%) were subarterial , 43 (47.78%) were inlet, and the last 6 (% 6.67) had a muscular type. 46 patients (51.11%) were under age 1, 37 of them (41.11%) were between ages 1-10, 6 patients (6.67%) were between ages 10-20, 1 of the patients (1.11%) was over age 20. Patients were evaluated by means of ECHO before the discharge and in the controls. Pericardial patches were used for 14 cases out of 38, for which residual VSD was determined, and synthetic patches were used for the other 24 cases, and eight of them closed spontaneously in approximately 1.8 years. Permanent pacemaker was placed in 3 cases (3.33%) in which atrioventricular blocks had developed, and perioperative 5 cases (5.56%) were lost. Statistically no significant difference was discovered between the pericardial and synthetic patches used for the confinement of VSD’s. Cost-effectiveness, availability and ease of utility may be included among the advantages of pericardial patches. Long-term results are needed.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Çalışmada opere olan izole VSD olgularında perikart ve sentetik yama sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Retrospektif çalışmada ameliyat olan 40 (%44.44) kadın, 50 (%55.56) erkek toplam 90 hasta dosyası incelendi. 32 hastada (%35.56) perikart yama, 58 hastada ( % 64.44) sentetik yama kullanılmıştı. Olguların 25’i (% 27.78) perimembranöz, 16’sı (%17.78) subarteriel 43’ü (% 47.78) inlet, ve 6’sı (% 6.67) musküler tipte idi. Hastaların 46’sı (% 51.11) 1 yaş altı, 37’si (%41.11) 1-10 yaş arası, 6’sı (%6.67) 10-20 yaş arasında, 1’i (%1.11) ise 20 yaşından büyüktü. Hastalar taburculuk öncesi ve kontrollerde EKO ile değerlendirilmişlerdi. Rezidü VSD saptanan 38 olgudan 14’ünde perikart, 24’ünde sentetik yama kullanılmış, bunlardan sekiz tanesi ortalama 1,8 yıl içinde spontan kapanmıştı. Atriyoventriküler blok gelişen 3 olguya (%3.33) kalıcı kalp pili takılmış, perioperatif 5 olgu (%5.56) kaybedilmişti. VSD’lerin kapatılmasında kullanılan perikart ile sentetik yamalar arasında işlev bakımından istatistiksel olarak fark bulunamadı. Kullanılabilir, masrafsız ve kolay bulunması peri- kardın avantajları arasında sayılabilir. Uzun dönem sonuçlara ihtiyaç vardır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-konjenital-vsdlerin-cerrahi-tedavisinde-kullanilan-otolog-perikart-yama-ile-sentetik-yama-materyallerin-sonuclarinin-karsilastirilmasi.pdf
  • 3
123-126
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Jacobs JP, Burke RP,Quintessenza JA, Mavroudis C.
Congenital Heart Surgery Nomenclature and Database Project:
Ventricular Septal Defect. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:25-35.
2. Gaynor JW, O Brien JE, Rychik J, et al. Outcome following
tricuspid valve detachment for ventricular septal defect closure.
Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 2001;19:279-82.
3. Tatebe S, Miyamura H, Watanabe H, Suqawara M, Equchi S.
Closure of isolated ventricular septal defect with detachment of
the tricuspid valve. J Card Surg 1995;10:564-8.
4. Pridjian AK, Pearce FB, Culpepper WS, et al. Atrioventricular
valve competence after take-down to improve exposure during
ventricular septal defect repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
1993;106:1122-5.
5. Sim EKW, Grignani RT, Wong ML, et al. Outcome of surgical
closure of doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal
defect. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:736-8.
6. Okita Y, Miki S, Kusuhara K, et al. Long-term results of aortic
valvuloplasty for aortic regurgitation associated with
ventriculer septal defect. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
1988;96:769-74.
7. Atay Y, Yağdı T, Başarır Ş, ve ark. Ventriküler septal defekt ve
aort yetersizliğinde cerrahi tedavi. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cer
Derg 1997;5:38-43.
8. Merrick AF, Lal M, Anderson RH, et al. Management of
ventricular septal defect. A survey of practice in the United
Kingdom. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:983-8.
9. Wincent Okwulehie, MD, Anil Kumar Dharmapuram, M.Ch.,
Sunil Kumar Swain, et al: Experience with autologous
perikardial patch closure of ventricular septal defect. Ind J
Thorac Cardiovasc surg, 2006;22:212-214.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com