Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

2006 VE 2010 AVRUPA PARLAMENTOSU ÜYELERİ ANKETLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRMASI: TÜRKİYE MESELESİNDE DAHA FAZLA POLARİZE OLMUŞ BİR AVRUPA PARLAMENTOSU

A COMPARISON OF THE 2006 AND 2010 MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT SURVEY RESULTS: A FURTHER POLARIZATION ON THE QUESTION OF TURKEY IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT?

Journal Name:

  • Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This paper analyzes data drawn from the 2006 and 2010 Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) surveys to compare how the attitudes of MEPs toward Turkey have changed. Through cross-tabulations, the paper presents some preliminary evidence that the Right in the current European Parliament (EP) is less friendly towards Turkey than was the Right in the previous EP, while the Left is friendlier towards Turkey than before. Although it needs further evidence to support this claim, one may suggest that the gap between the Right and the Left on the question of Turkish accession might be widening. Since no single group has the majority in the EP, the polarization on the question of Turkey may complicate con-sensus-building on Turkey, which is often necessary to vote down anti-Turkey proposals.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma, Avrupa Parlamentosu (AP) üyelerinin Türkiye’ye karşı değişen tutumlarını 2006 ve 2010 yılı ‘Avrupa Parlamentosu Üyeleri’ anketlerini karşılaştırarak incelemektedir. Makalede ki çapraz tablolar şuan ki AP sağ partileri üyelerinin bir önceki AP sağ partileri üyelerine göre Türkiye'nin AB’ye katılma-sına karşı daha negatif tutumlu olduğunu göstermektedir. Öte yandan, şuan ki AP solu bir önceki AP so-luna göre Türkiye’nin tam üyeliğine karşı daha olumlu yaklaşmaktadır. Her ne kadar tek bir çalışma ile genelleme yapmak zor ise de, AP sağı ile solu Türkiye konusunda daha fazla polarize olmuştur. Bu du-rum, AP’de Türkiye karşıtı yasalara karşı partiler arası bir koalisyon oluşturulmasını daha da zorlaştıra-caktır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_194000_5_pp_119-132.pdf
  • 9
119-132
  • English

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

ARCHICK, Kristin and Derek E. MIX (2011), “The European Parliament”, Current Economics and Politics of Europe, 22, (2), 238-53.
BPJNAR, Irena (2005), “Slovenia”. Juliet Lodge (ed.), in The 2004 Elections to the European Parliament, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 223-9
CORBETT, Richard (2005), “European Parliament 1999-2004”. Juliet Lodge (ed.), in The 2004 Elections to the European Parliament, New York: Palgrave Mac-millan, 8-17.
DRAKE, Helen (2005), “France” Juliet Lodge (ed.), in The 2004 Elections to the European Parliament, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 109-121
FARRELL, David, HİX, Simon and Roger SCULLY (2011), “EPRG MEP Survey Dataset: 2011 Release”, available at; http://www2.lse.ac.uk/government/
research/resgroups/EPRG/MEPsurveyData.aspx, Accessed 11.11.2011.
132 International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies
Year:5 Number 9, Summer 2012 ISSN 1307-9832
HIX, Simon and Abdul NOURY (2009), “After Enlargement: Voting Pat-terns in the Sixth European Parliament”, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34, (2), 159-174
MAYER, Terry (2005), “Lithuania”, Juliet Lodge (ed.), in The 2004 Elec-tions to the European Parliament, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 173-8
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2011), “Croatia’s EU accession: green light from Parliament” 1 December, available at; http://www,europarl.europa.eu/ news/en/pressroom/content/20111201IPR32926/htm/Croatias-EU-accession-green-light-from-Parliament (accessed 11.04.2011).
YUVACI, Abdullah (2011), “The voting behaviour of the European Parlia-ment members on Turkish accession: an analysis of the impact of member-state, Eu-ropean party group and national party affiliations on a special status amendment vote on Turkey”, manuscript under review.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com