Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Amerikan futbolcularında farklı protokollerden elde edilen anaerobik performans değerleri arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi

An investigation of relationship between various protocols of anaerobic performance tests in American football players

Journal Name:

  • Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between various protocols of anaerobic performance tests in American football players. 27 male American football players from a university team voluntarily participated this study ( X age: 23.07±3.45 yrs). Subjects’ height, body mass, skinfold thickness and anthropometric measurements were taken and Acikada formula (1991) was used for determining their body fat percentage. Wingate Anaerobic Power Test (WAnT), squat jump (SJ), counter movement jump (CMJ), repeated-jump and 10-20-30 meters transition (speed) times were used for the determination of anaerobic performance. Results of Pearson Product Moment correlation analysis, WAnT anaerobic power was significantly correlated with anaerobic capacity (r=.394; p<0.05), however WAnT anaerobic capacity was significantly correlated with squat jump (r=.536; p<0.01), 10m. sprint (r=-.608; p<0.01), 20m. sprint (r=-.626; p<0.01) and 30m. sprint (r=-.593; p<0.01). Similarly repeated jump was significantly correlated with squat jump (r=-.596; p<0.01), countermovement jump (r=-.462; p<0.05), 10m. sprint (r=-.632; p<0.01), 20m. sprint (r= -.558; p<0.01) and 30m. sprint (r=-.580; p<0.01). In addition to countermovement jump was significantly correlated with squat jump (r=-.791; p<0.01), 10m. sprint (r=-.609; p<0.01), 20m. sprint (r=-.590; p<0.01) and 30m. sprint (r=-.588; p<0.01). Results also indicated that squat jump was significantly correlated with 10m. sprint (r=-.711; p<0.01), 20m. sprint (r=-.658; p<0.01) and 30m. sprint (r=-.638; p<0.01). As a conclusion, the findings of the present study indicated that various protocols of anaerobic performance tests are related to each other. That is derived from the measurement protocols which all have anaerobic characteristics.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma Amerikan futbolu oyuncularında farklı protokollerden elde edilen anaerobik performans değerleri arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışmaya toplam 27 gönüllü (X yaş: 23.07±3.45 yıl) erkek üniversite öğrencisi katılmıştır. Deneklerin vücut kompozisyonlarının belirlenmesinde; boy uzunluğu, vücut ağırlığı, deri kıvrım kalınlığı, çevre ve çap ölçümleri yapılmış, yağ yüzdesinin belirlenmesinde ise Açıkada (1991) formülü kullanılmıştır. Anaerobik performans Wingate anaerobik güç ve kapasite testi (WAnT), aktif sıçrama, skuat sıçrama, çoklu sıçrama, 10m., 20m., 30m. testleri ile belirlenmiştir. Yapılan Pearson Çarpımlar Moment Korelasyon sonucunda elde edilen WAnT anaerobik güç ile anaerobik kapasite (r=.394; p<0.05) arasında da anlamlı ilişki bulunurken, anaerobik kapasite ile skuat sıçrama (r=.536; p<0.01), 10 metre koşu (r=-.608; p<0.01), 20 metre koşu (r=-.626; p<0.01) ve 30 metre koşu (r=-.593; p<0.01) arasında ilişki bulunmuştur. Buna benzer bir ilişkide çoklu sıçrama ile skuat sıçrama (r=-.596; p<0.01), aktif sıçrama (r=-.462; p<0.05), 10 metre koşu (r=-.632; p<0.01), 20 metre koşu (r=-.558; p<0.01) ve 30 metre koşu (r=-.580; p<0.01) arasında anlamlı ilişki bulunmuştur. Ayrıca aktif sıçrama ile skuat sıçrama (r=-.791; p<0.01), 10 metre koşu (r=-.609; p<0.01), 20 metre koşu (r=-.590; p<0.01) ve 30 metre koşu (r=-.588; p<0.01) arasında anlamlı ilişki bulunmuştur. Bu sonuçlara ek olarak skuat sıçrama ile 10 metre koşu (r=-.711; p<0.01), 20 metre koşu (r=-.658; p<0.01) ve 30 metre koşu (r=-.638; p<0.01) arasında anlamlı ilişki bulunmuştur. Sonuç olarak, çalışmadaki bulgular Amerikan futbolu oyuncularının farklı protokollerde elde edilen anaerobik performans sonuçlarının ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Buda kullanılan protokollerin anaerobik yapıya sahip olan ölçüm teknikleri olduğundan kaynaklanmaktadır
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_161047_6_pp_368-379.pdf
  • 2
368-379
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Açıkada, C., Ergen,E., Alpar, R., Sarpyener, K. (1991). Erkek sporcularda vücut kompozisyonu parametrelerinin incelenmesi. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi 2 (2):1-25.
2. Adams, G.M.(1998) Exercise physiology laboratory manual, 3rd ed. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
3. Arslan, C. (2005) Relationship between the 30-second Wingatetest and characteristics of isometric and explosive leg strength in young subjects. J. Strength Cond. Res. 19(3):658–666.
4. Aziz, AR and Chuan, TK. Correlation between tests of running repeated sprint ability and anaerobik capacity by Wingate cycling in multi-sprint sports athletes. Int j Appl Sports Sci 16: 14-22, 2004
5. Bale, P., Colley, E., Mayhew, J.L., Piper, F.C. & Ware J.S., (1994). Anthropometric and somatotype variables related to strength American football players. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness,34(4): 383-389.
6. Bampouras, TM., Marrin, K. (2009) Comparison of two anaerobic water polo–specific tests with the Wingate test. J Strength Cond Res 23(1): 336–340
7. Bloomfield, J, Ackland, TR., Elliot, BC. (1994) Applied anatomy and biomechanics in sport. Blackwell Scientific Publications.
8. Bosco, C., Luthanen, P., Komi, P. V. (1983 ). A Simple Method For Measurement of Mechanical Power in Jumping. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 50: 273-282
9. Bouchard, C., Taylor, A. W., Simaneau, J. ve Dulac, S., Testing anaerobic power and capacity, “physiological testing of the high performance athlete” (Ed L. MacDouall, H. A. Wenger, H. Gren)’de, Human Kinetics Books, Champaign, IL. s. 175-221, 1991.
10. Callaway, CW, Chumlea, CW, Bouchard, C., Himes J.H., Lohman, T.G., Martin, A.D., Mueller H. W., Roche, A. F. & Seefeldt, V.D. (1988) Circumferences. In Lohman, TG, Roche, AF & Marorell, R. (Eds). Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Illinois: Human Kinetics Books, s:39-54.
11. Gordon, CC., Chumlea, CC & Roche AF. (1988) Stature, Recumbent Length and Weight. İçinde (Eds) Lohman, TG, Roche, AF & Marorell, R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Illinois: Human Kinetics Books, s:3-8.
Eyuboğlu, E., Özkan, A., Köklü, Y., Alemdaroğlu, U., Akalan, C. (2009). Amerikan futbolcularında farklı
protokollerden elde edilen anaerobik performans değerleri arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi, Uluslararası
İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi [Bağlantıda]. 6:2. Erişim: http://www.insanbilimleri.com
378
12. Harrison, GG, Buskirk, ER, Carter JE ve ark. (1988) Skinfold Thicknesses and Measurement Technique. İçinde: (Eds) Lohman, TG, Roche, AF & Marorell, R. Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Illinois: Human Kinetics Books, s:55-80.
13. Heyward, V.H. & Stolarczyk, L.M., (1996). Applied body composition assessment, IL: Human Kinetics.s;21-43.
14. Hoffman, J.R.., Shmuel E., Eınbınder, M., Weınsteın Y. (2000) A comparison between the wingate anaerobic power test to both vertical jump and line drill tests in basketball players. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 14(3):261-264, August .
15. Inbar, O., O. Bar-Or, And J . S . Skınneh (1996) The wingate anaerobic test. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics,. Teams. J. Strength Cond. Res. 15(3):39«. 2001.
16. Koşar, Ş.N., Hazır, T.(1994). Wingate anaerobik güç testinin güvenirliği. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 4 (3):21-30
17. Kin İşler, A., Arıburun, B., Özkan A., (2008). The relationship between anaerobic performance, muscle strength, and sprint ability in american football player. Isokinetics and Exercise Science. 16(2):87-92.
18. Kuhn, W. (1991). A comparative analysis of selected motor performance variables ın american football, rugby union and soccer players (Eds) Reilly, T., Clarys, J. & Stibbe, A. Science and Football 2 Lacıvert. London: E& FN Spon, An Imprint of Chapman & Hall,p:62-69.
19. Miller, T.A., Kinley, K.A., Congleton, J.J., Clark, M.J. & White,E. (2002). The effects of training history, players position and body composition on exercise performance on exercise performance in collegiate football players. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, (16) 1:44-49.
20. Powers, S.K. ve Howley, E.T.(1996) Exercise physiology:theory and application to fitnessand performance, 3 ed. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
21. Reilly, T., Secher, N., Snell, P.& Williams, C. (1990). Physiology of sports. London: E& FN Spon, An Imprint of Chapman & Hall, p: 401-406.
22. Ross, W. D. & Marfell-Jones, M. J. (1991) Kinanthropometry. In MacDougall, D. J., Wenger, A. H & Green, H. J. (Eds). Physiological testing of the high-performance athlete. Illinois: Human Kinetics Books, s: 223-308.
Eyuboğlu, E., Özkan, A., Köklü, Y., Alemdaroğlu, U., Akalan, C. (2009). Amerikan futbolcularında farklı
protokollerden elde edilen anaerobik performans değerleri arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi, Uluslararası
İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi [Bağlantıda]. 6:2. Erişim: http://www.insanbilimleri.com
379
23. Sands ,W.A., McNeal, J.R.., Ochi, M.T. Urbanek, T.L., Jemni, M. ve Stone M.H (2004). Comparison of the wingate and bosco anaerobic test. Journal of Strenght and Conditioning .810-814
24. Semenick, D. (1990). The vertical jump. Nat. Strength Cond. Assoc. J.12(3):68-69.
25. Tharp, G.D., Newhouse, R.K., Uffelman, L., Thorland, W.G., and Johnson, G.O. (1985). Comparison of sprint and run times with perfonmance on the wingate anaerobic test. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. Vol :56, No:1 pp:73-76
26. Wade, A.(1979). The F.A. Guide to Training and Coaching. Heineman: London
27. Mayhew, J . L., Pratheh, L.M., K. Mc Guire. Ball T.E., and Bowen J.C.(1999). validation of gender difference in the margaria- kalamen anaerobic power test. J. Hunt. Move.. Stud. 36:289- 301.
28. Wilmore, J.H., Frisancho, R.A., Gordon C.C. (1988). Body breath equipment and measurement technique (Eds) Lohman, T.G., Roche, A.F. & Marorell, R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Illinois: Human Kinetics Books, p:55-80

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com