Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Effectiveness of frequent testing over achievement: A meta analysis study

Journal Name:

  • Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In current study, through a meta-analysis of 78 studies, it is aimed to determine the overall effect size for testing at different frequency levels and to find out other study characteristics, related to the effectiveness of frequent testing. 78 studies met the inclusion criteria out of 118 experimental and quasi-experimental studies in the potential study pool and 37 of them were journal articles, 21 doctoral dissertations, 14 master theses, and the rest were ERIC documents and conference papers. The newest study in the pool dated back to the year 2003. After the coding process, Hedges’ d effect size was calculated. The results were analyzed by SPSS and Meta Win. 233 effect sizes were calculated from 78 studies. Studies with similar exam frequency were categorized into three categories: low, medium, and high according to the frequency of the tests used in the study. According to the results, the cumulative mean effect size for 78 studies was .46. The results also indicated that there were not statistically significant differences between the mean effect sizes of the studies examine students at high, medium and low frequency levels. Overall, the findings indicated that frequent testing increases academic achievement. Also, the effectiveness of a set of categorical variables possibly related to the overall effect size for academic achievement is sought through Q statistic.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_161047_6_pp_99-121.pdf
  • 2
99-121
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. ( 1991). The
instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research,
61(2), 213 - 238.
Başol-Göçmen, G. (2004). Meta Analysis. Eğitim Araştırmaları, 15, 16-22.
Bess, E. J. (1938). The effects of written examinations on learning and on the retention of
learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 7, 55-62.
Cooper, H. M. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Curo, D. (1963). An Investigation of the influence of daily pre-class testing on achievement
in high school American history classes. Purdue University. Dissertation Abstracts
International, 24(12), 5236.
Deputy, E. C. (1929). Knowledge of success as motivating influence in college work.
Journal of Educational Research, 20(5), 327-334.
Eurich, A. C., Longstaff, H. P., & Wilder, M. ( 1937). The effects of weekly tests upon
achievement in psychology. Report of the Committee on Education Research,
University of Minnesota. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Eysenck, H. J. (1978). An exercise in mega-silliness. American Psychologist, 33, 517.
Fitch, M. L., Drucker, A. J., & Norton, J. R. (1951). Frequent testing as a motivating factor in
large lecture classes. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 42, 1-20.
Glass, G.V, McGraw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly
Hills, CA: Sage.
Gocmen, G. B. (1997). The effects of frequent testing on achievement. Unpublished Seminar
Paper, Ohio University.
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA:
Academic Press Inc.
Başol, G., Johanson, G. (2009). Effectiveness of frequent testing over achievement: a meta analysis study
International Journal of Human Sciences [Online]. 6:2. Available: http://www.insanbilimleri.com/en
121
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Jones, H. E. (1923). Experimental studies of college teaching. Archives of Psychology, 68, 5-
70.
Kulik, C-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1986). Effects of testing for mastery
on student learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American
Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Kulik, C-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1990). Effectiveness of mastery
learning programs: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 60(2), 265-
299.
Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observed agreement for categorical data.
Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
Light, R. J. (1980). Synthesis methods: Some judgment calls that must be made. Evaluation
in Education, 4, 13-17.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Applied social research
methods series, 49. London, New Delhi: Sage.
Palmer, E. L. (1974). Frequency of tests and general subject area mastery. Psychological
Reports, 35(1), 422.
Pecknam, P. D., & Roe, M. D. (1977). The effects of frequent testing. Journal of Research
and Development in Education, 10(3), 40-50.
Rosenberg, M. S., Adams, D. C., & Gurevitch, J. (2000). Meta Win: Statistical software for
meta-analysis. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Schutte, T. H. (1925). Is there any value in the final examination? Journal of Educational
Research, 12, 204-13.
Stanlee, L.S., & Popham, W. J. (1960). Quizzes' contribution to learning. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 51(6), 322-325.
Townsend, N. R. (1972). The relationship of frequency of tests and delay of feedback of
test results to achievement in first quarter analytic geometry and calculus. Purdue
University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 33, 06 A.
Townsend, N. R. (1972). The relationship of frequency of tests and delay of feedback of test
results to achievement in first quarter analytic geometry and calculus. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Turney, A. H. (1931). The effect of frequent short objective tests upon the achievement of
college students in educational psychology. School and Society, 33, 760-762.
Williams, M. L. (1931). The effect of frequent classroom testing on the learning and
retention of subject matter. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Cincinnati.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com