Buradasınız

The effect of message type on primary perceptual field in visuals

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study aims to determine the relationship between message type and the field(s) that students perceive first in an instructional material. It employs the scanning model and its study group consists of 150 sophomore students attending the Faculty of Education at Ahi Evran University. The data has been obtained by identifying the student responses to a visual material designed by the researchers. The results have been interpreted through the frequency, percentage and the Kendall’s tau_b test applied on the collected data (p<.05). As a result, message type is of importance in placing the message in an instructional material. The field including the primarily perceived message in a visual principally focuses around the center of the visual or in the first point of interest according to the rule of thirds. Furthermore, encoding messages in the form of letters or numbers leads to a change in the primary perceptual field. Therefore, it would be useful to encode verbal information in various techniques such as numerical expression, symbolization, etc.
1052-1070

REFERENCES

References: 

Alessi, S. M. & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development
(3rd Ed.). Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
Aspillaga, M. (1991). Screen design: location of information and its effects on learning.
Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18(3), 89-92
Banerjee, S. (2004). Composition-guided image acquisition. The University of Texas:
Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy.
Barlow, G. (2006). The ‘Rule of Thirds’. Retrieved May 3 2008 from: http://www.inetgs.
com/pdfs/Tutorial%20-%20Rule%20of%20Thirds.pdf.
Bell, J. (1984). The effect of presentation form on the use of information in annual reports.
Management Science, Vol. 30, No. 2, 169-185.
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewsi, M. W., Reimann, P. & Glaser, R. (1989). Selfexplanations:
How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems.
Cognitive Science 13, 145-182.
Cook, E. K. & Kazlauskas, E. J. (1993). The cognitive and behavioral basis of an
instructional design: Using CBT to teach technical information and learning
strategies. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 21(4).
Dale, E. (1969). Audiovisual methods in teaching (3rd Ed.). New York: The Dryden Press.
Dorfman, A. (1984). Using science to design ads. Science Diges. Vol. 92.
Dragicevic, P. & Colin, C. (1998). Using guiding lines for increasing the effectiveness of
images. International Conference Graphicon, Moscow, Russia,
Faiola, T. & DeBloois M. L. (1988). Designing a visual factors-based screen display
interface: The new role of the graphic technologist. Educational Technology, 28(8).
George, G. (1992). Monkeycam see - monkeycam do: Considering reflexive aesthetics in
the teaching of film and video. Meeting of The Canadian Communications
Korkmaz, Ö. (2011). The effect of message type on primary perceptual field in visuals. International
Journal of Human Sciences [Online]. 8:1. Available: http://www.InsanBilimleri.com/En
1069
Association, Canada: Charlottetow, Prince Edwar Islan. Jule 4-5. ERIC No:
ED355575.
Golub, E. (2007). Photocropr a first step towards computer-supported automatic
generation of photographically interesting cropping suggestions. HCIL Technical
Report. Retrieved May 09 2008 from http://www.cs.umd.edu/~egolub/
PhotoApps/PhotoCropr/PhotoCropr TR-Draft1_16.pdf.
Gooch, B. Reinhard, E. & Shirley, P. (2001). Artistic composition for image creation.
Retrieved May 6 2008 from http://www.cs.utah.edu/~shirley/papers/
Composition.pdf.
Greenzweig, T. (2001). Aesthetic experience and the importance of visual composition in
information design. Orange Journal. Retrieved May 1 2008 From http://eserver.org
/courses/w01/tc510/orange/composition.pdf.
Hathaway, M. D. (1984). Variables or computer screen display and how they affect
learning. Educational Technology. 24(7).
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D. & Smaldino, S. E. (1993). Instructional Media
and the New Technologies of Instruction. Macmillan Publishing Company.
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D. & Smaldino, S. E. (2002). Instructional media
and technologies for learning (7th Ed.). New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Land, M., Mennie, N. & Rusted, J. (1999). The roles of vision and eye movements in the
control of activities of daily living. Perception, volume 28, pages 1311 – 1328.
Lister, S. (2005). Analyzing students’ usage of the rule of thirds in photography software.
(An Action Research Project). Michigan State University: Part Of The Capstone
Requirement For The Masters Of Arts In Educational Technology (July, 2003
Update April 24, 2005).
Livingston, L. A. (1991). The effect of color on performance in an instructional gaming
environment. Journal of Research of Computing in Education. 24(2), 246-253.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M. & Kemp, J. E. (2001). Designing effective instruction (3rd
Ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Nesbit, L. L. (1981). Relationship between eye movement, learning, and picture
complexity. Educational Technology Research, and Development, 29(2), 109-116.
Newman, J. J. (1971). Direct reading eye movement monitor system. United State Patent
3583794
Oman, J. M. (2002). Student perceptions of set inductions in technology education. The
Graduate College University of Wisconsin-Stout: A Research Paper Submitted in
Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Science Degree.
Korkmaz, Ö. (2011). The effect of message type on primary perceptual field in visuals. International
Journal of Human Sciences [Online]. 8:1. Available: http://www.InsanBilimleri.com/En
1070
Seels, B. & Richey, R. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the
field. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and
Technology.
Szabo, M.& Poohkay, B. (1994). So what if it's in color and moves' A critique of
multimedia. Paper presented at ED-MEDIA’94 World Conference on Educational
Media Hypermedia, Vancouver, BC.
Szabo. M. & Kanuka, H. (1998). Effects of violating screen design principles of balance,
unity, and focus on recall learning, study time, and completion rate. Journal of
Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8(1), 23-42.
Winn, W. (1993). Perception principles. In M. Fleming (Ed.), Instructional message
design: Principles from the behavioral and cognitive sciences. Educational
Technology publications Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
York, A. & Ruthand, J. A. (2004). Framing information to enhance corporate reputation
The impact of message source, information type, and reference point. Journal of
Business Research, 57(1), 14-20.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com