Buradasınız

Self, identity and identity formation: From the perspectives of three major theories

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
This study revealed that there are three major perspectives in explaining the identity and identity formation. The first one is social identity theory where the founders see the group membership as the driving force for identity formation. The next theory is identity theory, in which the roles that are assigned to individuals are deemed as the major source for energy to identity formation. The last theory talks about the importance of personal values in explaining the identity and identity formation process (personal identity theory). This paper will talk about three of them separately and in the end the need to merge these theories will be stressed.

REFERENCES

References: 

Abrams, D. and Hogg, M. A. (1990). Social Identity Theory: Constructive and critical advances.
London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
Baumeister, R. F. (1986). Identity, Cultural Change, and the Struggle for Self. New York: Oxford
University Press.
1130
Cinoğlu, H., & Arıkan, Y. (2012). Self, identity and identity formation: From the perspectives of three major theories.
International Journal of Human Sciences [Online]. (9)2, 1114-1131.
Burke, P. J. (1980). The self: Measurement Implications from a Symbolic Interactionist Perspective.
Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 18-29.
Burke, P. J. (1997). An Identity Model for Network Exchange. American Sociological Review, 62,
134-150.
Burke, P. J. (2001). Relationships among multiple identities. Bloomington, IN: The Future of
Identity Theory and Research: A Guide for a New Century Conference.
Burke, P. J. and Cast, A. D. (1997). Stability and change in the gender identities of newly married
couples. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 277-290.
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Scribner's.
Gecas, V. (1986). "The Motivational Significance of Self-concept for Socialization Theory." Pp.
131-56 in Advances in Group Processes, vol. 3, edited by Edward J. Lawler. Greenwich,
CT. JAI Press.
Goffman E. (1961). Asylums. Essays on the Social Situation of Mental patients and Other Inmates
Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Henslin, J. M. (2007). Sociology: A Down-To-Earth Approach. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Hewitt, J. P. (1989). Dilemmas of the American Self: Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Hitlin, S. (2003). Values as the Core Personal Identity: Drawing Links between Two Theories of
Self. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 118-137.
Hogg, M. A. and Hardie E. A. (1992). “Prototypicality, Conformity and Depersonalized Attraction:
A Self-Categorization Analysis of Group cohesiveness.” British Journal of Social
Psychology 31:41-56.
Joas, H. (2000). The Genesis of Values. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Kiecolt, K. J. (1994). Stress and the decision to change oneself: A theoretical model. Social
Psychology Quarterly, 57, 49-63.
Linville, P. (1987). Self-complexity as a cognitive buffer against stress-related illness and depression.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 663-676.
Maslow, A. H. (1943) A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
McCall, G. J. and Simmons, J. L. (1978). Identities and interactions. New York: Free Press.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nagel, J. (1995). American indian ethnic renewal: Politics and the resurgence of identity. American
Sociological Review, 60, 947-965.
Oakes, P. (1987). The salience of social categories. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D.
Prentice, D. A. (2001). "The Individual Self, Relational Self and Collective Self: A Commentary."
Pp. 315-26 in Individual Self; Relational Self; Collective Self; edited by Constantine
Sedikides and Marilynn B. Brewer. Ann Arbor: Taylor and Francis.
Reiber. S. (1998). The Concept of Personal Identity. Philosophy of Phenomenological Research, 58,
581-594.
Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). "Universals in the Content and Structure of Va1ues: Theoretical Advances
and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries." Pp. 1-65 in Advances in Experimental Social
Psychology, vol. 24, edited by Mark P. Zanna. San Diego: Academic Press.
1131
Cinoğlu, H., & Arıkan, Y. (2012). Self, identity and identity formation: From the perspectives of three major theories.
International Journal of Human Sciences [Online]. (9)2, 1114-1131.
Seligman, C. and Albert, K.. (1996). "The Dynamics of Value Systems." Pp. 53-75 in The Ontario
Symposium: The Psychology of Values, edited by Clive Seligman, James M. Olson, and
Mark P. Zanna. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Serpe, R. T. and Stryker, S. (1987). The construction of self and reconstruction of social
relationships. In E. Lawler and B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in group processes (pp. 41-
66). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Simon, B, Pantaleo, G. and Mummendey, A. (1995). “Unique Individual or Interchangeable Group
Member? The Accentuation of Intragroup Differences Versus Similarities as an Indicator
of the Individual Self Versus the Collective Self.” Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology 69:106-19.
Stets, J. E. and Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology
Quarterly, 63, 224-237.
Stets J. E. and Burke P. J. (2003). "A Sociological Approach to Self and Identity." in The Handbook
of Self and Identity edited by M. R. Leary and J. P. Tangney. New York: Guilford Press
Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA:
Benjamin/Cummings.
Stryker, S. and Burke, P. J. (2000). "The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory." Social
Psychology Quarterly, 63:284-97.
Stryker, S. and Serpe, R. T. (1982). Commitment, identity salience, and role behavior: A theory and
research example. In W. Ickes and E. S. Knowles (Eds.), Personality, roles, and social
behavior (pp.199-218). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Stryker, S. and Serpe, R. T. (1994). Identity salience and psychological centrality: Equivalent,
overlapping, or complementary concepts? Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 16-35.
Swidler, A. (1986). "Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies." American Sociological Review
51:273-86.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H. and Jonathan C. T.. (1979). "An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict." Pp. 33-47 in
Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by William G. Austin and Stephen Worchel.
Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Thoits, P. A. (1986). Multiple identities: Examining gender and marital status differences in distress.
American Sociological Review, 51, 259-272.
Tsushima, T. and Burke, P. J. (1999). Levels, agency, and control in the parent identity. Social
Psychology Quarterly, 62, 173-189.
Turner, J. C. Hogg, M. A. Oakes, P. J. Reicher, S. D. and Wetherell, M. S. (Eds.), (1987).
Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com