Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Internet censorship in Turkey: University students' opinions

Journal Name:

  • World Journal on Educational Technology

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this paper is to study university students’ opinions toward online censorship with references to their sociopolitical and economic variables. Considering the upwards trend and the increasing number of online restrictions in Turkey, the opinions of university students (n=138) are thought to give significant findings. The questionnaire aimed to collect data on some chosen aspects of censorship which are internet access regulation by legal authorities, online pornographic content, websites distributing illegal and crime related information and the political and religious aspects of the internet censorship. The findings about these four basic aspects toward the online censorship revealed that despite the high proportion of approval, participants have a confused and inconsistent attitude towards the issue especially within the application and the idea of censorship. In a broader aspect, the findings can be interpreted as a sign of university students’ insufficient knowledge and understanding towards the current situation and the possible future of online censorship in Turkey.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_159831_1_pp_46-56.pdf
  • 1
46-56
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Akdeniz, Y., and K. Altıparmak (2008). Internet: Restricted Access. Ankara: İmaj.
Caso , F., and R. B. Collins (2008). Global Issues: Censorship. New York: InfoBase Publishing.
İhbar istatistikleri [Statistics of complaints]. http://www.guvenliweb.org.tr/content/ihbaristatistikleri‐
g%C3%BCncellendi [January 22, 2009].
Marsden, C. T. (2008). Beyond Europe: The Internet, Regulation, and Multistakeholder Governance—
Representing the Consumer Interest? Journal of Consumer Policy, 31(1).
http://www.springerlink.com/content/p7636403v7426531/fulltext.html [January 22, 2009].
Hasan Ozkan & Arda Arikan / World Journal on Educational Technology 1(2009) 46‐56
56
Pornography Statistics [Pornography statistics] (2006). ‘Family Safe Media’, URL (consulted Jan.
2009): http://familysafemedia.com/pornography_statistics.html#time [January 24, 2009].
RTUK Kanunu [the Supreme Board of Radio and Television] (2002). ‘Tissad’, URL (consulted Jan.
2009): http://www.tissad.org.tr/yasa.html [January 21, 2009].
Søraker, J. H. (2008). Global Freedom of Expression Within Nontextual Frameworks. The Information
Society, 24, 40–46.
Treble, P. (2008). China aims to clean up the Internet. Maclean’s. 122(1), 42.
Tsui, L. (2003). The Panopticon as the anthithesis of a space of freedom. China Information, 17(2), 65‐
82.
Turkish Criminal Code (2004). http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/kanunlar/k5237.html [January 20, 2009].

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com