Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Enriching traditional biology lectures– digital concept maps and their influence on achievement and motivation

Journal Name:

  • World Journal on Educational Technology

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Higher education deals with complex knowledge and university teaching should focus on conceptual understanding. Adequate knowledge structures are essential and active knowledge construction should be supported for meaningful learning. But traditional lectures mostly are structured by slides which may misleadingly cause linear representations of knowledge. In this study, a framework for digital concept maps was developed to complement lectures in human biology. The course was aimed at student science teachers at the undergraduate level. The work is based on theoretical research on computer-supported learning, on knowledge structures perspectives within learning environments as well as on self-determination theory. Each session was supplemented by a digital, multimedia-enriched concept map. After each single lecture, students had free access to the concept maps to reinforce the latest topics. The objective of the study was to examine if the use of complementary concept maps (i) influences achievement and (ii) if motivational variables influence the use of the concept maps. In both cases, influences of computer-user self-efficacy were expected (iii). The students’ (N = 171) concept map use was logged, achievement was tested and motivational variables were surveyed (e.g. interest/ enjoyment, perceived competence, effort/ importance, value/usefulness). The logfile-data allowed distinguishing learners according to their concept map use. Results reveal the benefit of additional concept maps for achievement, positive motivational aspects and computer-user self-efficacy as mediating factors showed some influence. The emphasize of further research should be on students’ active engagement in structuring their individual learning by constructing concept maps themselves, especially in science education courses.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_159831_2_pp_42-54.pdf
  • 1
42-54
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Åhlberg, M. (2004). Varieties of concept mapping. In Canas, A., Novak, J. & Gonzales, F. (Eds.)
Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology. Proceedings of the First International
Conference on Concept mapping. CMC 2004, Pamplona, Spain.
http://cmc.ihmc.us/papers/cmc2004-206.pdf, retrieved 25.06.2010
Steffen Schaal / World Journal on Educational Technology (2010) 42-54
52
Allan, D. & Tanner, D. (2003). Approaches to cell biology teaching: Mapping the journey—concept
maps as signposts of developing knowledge structures. Cell Biology Education, 2(3), 133-136
Alpert, S. (2005). Comprehensive Mapping of Knowledge and Information Resources: The case of
Webster. In Tergan, S.-O. & Keller, T. (Eds.), Knowledge and information visualization:
searching for synergies (pp. 208-225). Heidelberg: Springer.
Alpert, S. (2006). Computer-based concept mapping. In C. Ghaoui (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human
Computer Interaction (pp 100-104). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
Alpert, S. & Gruenenberg, K. (2000). Concept mapping with multimedia on the web. Journal of
Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4), 313-330.
Anderson, J. (2004). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Worth Publishers.
Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Bransford, J., Brown, A. & Cocking, R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school.
Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood
Cliffs: Prantice-Hall.
Buntting, C., Coll, R. & Campbell, A. (2004). Introductory biology courses at university: Gaps
between lecturer assumptions and student reality. In D. Zandvliet (Ed.), Proceedings of the
Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (pp. 1-19).
Vancouver, BC.
Buntting, C., Coll, R. & Campbell, A. (2006) Students views of concept mapping use in introductory
tertiary biology classes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(4), 641-
668.
Cañas, A., Hill, G., Carff, R., Suri, N., Lott, J., Eskridge, T., et al. (2004). CmapTools: A knowledge
modeling and sharing environment. In A.J. Cañas, J.D. Novak, & F.M. González (Eds.), Concept
maps: Theory, methodology, technology. Proceedings of the 1st international conference on
concept mapping (pp. 125-133). Pamplona: Universidad Públiade Navarra.
Cassidy, S. & Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the computer user self-efficacy (CUSE) scale.
Investigating the Relationship between Computer Self-Efficacy, Gender and Experience with
Computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(2), 133-153.
Chularut, P. & DeBacker, T. (2004). The influence of concept mapping on achievement, selfregulation,
and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. Contemporary
Educational Psychology, 29(3), 248-263.
Coutinho, C. & Bottentuit Junior, J. (2008). Using concept maps with postgraduate teachers in a
web-based environment: an exploratory study. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognition
and the Web: Information Processing. Comprehension and Learning (pp. 139-145). Granada.
Czerniak, C. & Haney, J. (1998). The effect of collaborative concept mapping in elementary
preservice teachers’ anxiety, efficacy, and achievement in physical science. Journal of Science
Teacher Education, 9(4), 303-320.
Daley, B. (2002). Facilitating learning with adult students through concept mapping. Journal of
Continuing Higher Education, 50(1), 21-33.
Steffen Schaal / World Journal on Educational Technology (2010) 42-54
53
Dansereau, D. (2005). Node-link mapping principles for visualizing information and knowledge. In S.-
O. Tergan & T. Keller (Eds.), Knowledge and information visualization: Searching for synergies
(pp. 53–73). Heidelberg: Springer.
Di Cerbo, K. (2007). Knowledge structures of entering computer networking students and their
instructors. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6, 263-277.
Ferry, B., Hedberg, J. & Harper, B. (1997). How do preservice teachers use concept maps to organize
their curriculum content knowledge? Paper presented at ASCILITE Conference, Perth, Australia.
http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth97/papers/Ferry/Ferry.html; retrieved
25.06.2010.
Fisher, K., Wandersee, J. & Moody, D. (2000). Mapping biology knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Girwidz, R., Rubitzko, T., Schaal, S. & Bogner, F.-X. (2006) Theoretical concepts for using multimedia
in science education. Science Education International, 17(2), 77-93.
Holley, C. & Dansereau, D. (1984). The development of spatial learning strategies. In C. Holley & D.
Dansereaau (Eds.), Spatial learning strategies. Techniques, applications, and related issues (pp.
3– 19). New York: Academic Press.
Jüngst, K. & Bernd, H. (1999). Lernen mit Concept Maps: Lerneffektivität von Selbstkonstruktion und
Durcharbeiten. In W. Schulz (Eds.), Aspekte und Probleme der didaktischen
Wissensstrukturierung (pp. 113–129). Frankfurt a.M: Peter Lang.
Kinchin, I. (2000). Concept mapping in biology, Journal of Biological Education, 34 (2), 61-68.
Kinchin, I. (2001). If concept mapping is so helpful to learning biology, why aren’t we all doing it?
International Journal of Science Education, 23(12), 1257-1269.
Kinchin, I. (2006). Concept mapping, Power Point, and a pedagogy of access. Journal of Biological
Education, 40(2), 79-83.
Kinchin, I. (2009). A knowledge structures perspective on the scholarship of teaching & learning.
International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2).
Kinchin, I., Chadha, D. and Kokotailo, P. (2008). Using PowerPoint as a lens to focus on linearity in
teaching. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32(4): 333 – 346.
Kinchin, I., Hay, D. & Adams, A. (2000) How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be
used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research,
42(1), 43–57.
Kozma, R. (2003). Material and Social Affordances of Multiple Representations for Science
Understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205-226.
Lawless, C., Smee, P. & O’Shea, T. (1998). Using concept sorting and concept mapping in business
and public administration, and in education: An overview. Educational Research, 40, 219–235
Lederman, N. & Latz, M. (1995). Knowledge structures in the preservice science teacher: Sources,
development, interactions, and relationships to teaching. Journal of Science Teacher
Education, 6, 1–19.
Martin, D. (1994). Concept mapping as an aid to lesson planning: A longitudinal study. Journal of
Elementary Science Education, 6(2), 11-30.
McAuley, E., Duncan, T. and Tammen, V. V. (1987). Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic
Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research
Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, 48-58.
Steffen Schaal / World Journal on Educational Technology (2010) 42-54
54
Merriam, S. & Cafarelle, R. (1999). Learning in Adulthood. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mintzes, J., Wandersee, J. & Novak, J. (2005). Teaching Science for Understanding: A Human
Constructivist View. Oxford: Elsevier.
Neumann, A., Graeber, W., & Tergan, S.-O. (2005). Visualizing ideas and information in a resourcebased
learning environment: The case of ParIS. In S.-O. Tergan & T. Keller (Eds.), Knowledge
and information visualization: Searching for synergies (pp. 244–269). Heidelberg: Springer-
Verlag.
Niemiec, C., Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2009). The path taken: Consequences of attaining intrinsic and
extrinsic aspirations in post-college life. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 291-306.
Novak, J. (1998). Learning, creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in
schools and corporations. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Novak, J. (2010). Learning, creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in
schools and corporations. New York: Routledge.
Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (2004) Building on a new constructivist ideas and CmapTools to create a new
model for education. In A. Cañas, J. Novak & F. Gonzales (Eds.), Proceeding 1st International
Conference on Concept Mapping. Pamplona: University of Navarra.
Novak, J. & Cañas, A. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them.
Technical Report IHMC CmapTools, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptM...,
retrieved 08.11.2009.
Pintrich, P. & Schunk, D. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications.
Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall Merrill.
Plant, R. & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and the effects of self-consciousness, selfawareness,
and ego-involvement: An investigation of internally-controlling styles. Journal of
Personality, 53, 435-449.
Rojer, R. and Rojer, J. (2004). Compared hand drawn and computer generated concept mapping.
Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 23(1), 67-81.
Ryan, R. & Deci, E. (2008). Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in
personality and the organization of behavior. In O. John, R. Robbins, & L. Pervin (Eds.),
Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 654-678). New York: The Guilford Press.
Ryan, R., Connell, J. & Plant, R. (1990). Emotions in non-directed text learning. Learning and
Individual Differences, 2, 1-17.
Schaal, S. (2006). Fachintegratives Lernen mit digitalen Medien: Die theoriegeleitete Entwicklung
und Evaluation einer hypermedialen Lernumgebung für den naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht
in der Realschule. Hamburg: Kovac.
Schaal, S. & Bogner, F. (2005). Concept Mapping zur Erfassung struktureller Lernzuwächse im
computergestützten fachintegrativen Unterricht. In H. Bayrhuber et al. (Eds.),
Bildungsstandards Biologie, Internationale Tagung der Sektion Biologiedidaktik im VDBiol (pp.
135-138). Kassel: VDBiol.
Schaal, S., Bogner, F. & Girwidz, R. (2010). Concept mapping assessment of media assisted learning
in interdisciplinary science education. Research in Science Education, 40, 339-352.
Steffen Schaal / World Journal on Educational Technology (2010) 42-54
55
Schmid, R. & Telaro, G. (1990). Concept mapping as an instructional strategy for high school biology.
Journal of Educational Research, 2(84), 78-85.
Sherborne, T. (2009) Mapping the curriculum: How concept maps can improve the effectiveness of
course development. In Okada, A., Buckingham-Shum, S. and Sherborne, T. (Eds.) Knowledge
Cartography: Software tools and mapping techniques (pp. 183-198). London: Springer.
Sigler, E. & Saam, J. (2006). Teacher candidates’ conceptual understanding. Journal of Scholarship of
Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 118-126.
Spannagel, C. (2007). Benutzungsprozesse beim Lernen und Lehren mit Computern. Hildesheim,
Berlin: Franzbecker.
Tergan, S.-O. (2005). Digital Concept maps for managing knowledge and information. In S.-O. Tergan
& T. Keller (Eds.), Knowledge and Information Visualization (pp. 185-204). Heidelberg:
Springer.
Tergan, S.-O., Keller, T. & Burkhard, R. (2006). Integrating knowledge and information. Digital
concept maps as a bridging technology. Information Visualization, 5(3), 167-174.
Tzeng, J. (2009). The impact of general and specific performance and self-efficacy on learning with
computer-based concept mapping. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 989-99.
Vennix, J. & Gubbels, J. (1992). Knowledge elicitation in conceptual model building: a case study in
modeling a regional Dutch health care system. European Journal of Operational Research,
59(1), 85–101.
Yin, Y., Vanides, J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Ayala, C. C., & Shavelson, R. J. (2005). Comparison of two
concept-mapping techniques: Implications for scoring, interpretation, and use. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 166-184.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com