Buradasınız

Instructional technology and creativity among university students: the missing link

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are differences in the creativity level between a group of university students who were taught utilizing instructional technology and a control group taught via traditional method of instruction. The Test your Creativity Level (TYCL) was administered as a pre-test and post-test for both groups of students (42 in the experimental group and 41 in the control group). Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) on the post-test results of the TYCL with the pretest scores as a covariate indicated significant differences between the groups at the .05 alpha level in favor of the experimental group on the overall creativity level and on each dimension’s scores (intuitive awareness, external locus of control, self-confidence, and originality). University administrators should encourage faculty members to incorporate instructional technology into their teaching/learning process, plan curriculums around technology to advance the knowledge and creativity of students.

REFERENCES

References: 

Ackerman, D. (2003). Synthesize traditional and progressive education for today’s students. The
Education Digest, 68(7), 4-12.
Boekarts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego: Academic
Press.
Britannica Encyclopedia. (2003). Retrieved March,2009
from: http:// www.britannica.com.
Chisholm, M. I., Carey, J., & Hernandez, A. (2002). Information technology skills for a
pluralistic society: Is the playing field level? Journal of Research on Technology in Education,
35(1), 58-79.
Cromwell, R. (1997). Creativity is a key to the future and to education: The importance of creative
visioning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for
Teacher Education. San Diego, CA.
Yousef Ahmed Eyadat & Waleed Mustafa Eyadat / World Journal on Educational Technology (2010) 87-99
98
Csiksazentmihaly, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New
York: Harper Collins.
Devlin, M & James, R. (2003). The potential of a methodology for university-wide multimedia and
educational technology evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(1), 47-58.
Dollinger, S. J. (2003). Need for uniqueness, need for cognition, and creativity. Journal of creative
behavior, 37, 99-116.
Fabry, D. L., & Higgs, J. R. (1997). Barriers to the effective use of technology in education: Current
status. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 385-395.
Garbe, E. (1998). Making connections. Retrieved July 21,2008, from:
http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe/document
Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children learn and how schools should teach. New
York: Basic Books.
Gregoire, R., Bracewell, R., & Laferriere, T. (1996). The contribution of new technologies to learning
and teaching in elementary and secondary schools. retrived 02-30-2009 from
(http://www.tact.fse.ulaval.ca/fr/html
Hammadi, A. (1999). Senat al-ebdae (the industry of creativity). Dubai, United Arab Emirates: Dar
Ben Hazim.
Hogarty, K. Y., Lang, T. R., & Kromrey, J. D. (2003). Another look at technology use in classrooms:
The development and validation of an instrument to measure teachers’ perceptions. Educational
and Psychological Measurement, 63(1), 139-162.
Holst, J. K. (2003). Implementing project-based learning in pre-service teacher education. Retrieved
04-30-09 from from: http://surveys.canterbury.ac.nz/herdsa03Retrived
Hoyt, B. R. (1997). Design and implement custom electronic performance support system (EPSS) for
training in project-based classes. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Isaksen, S., Dorval, K., & Treffinger, D. (2000). Creative approaches to problem-solving. Dubuque,
Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
Kames, F. A., & Bean, S. M. (2001). Methods and materials for teaching the gifted Waco. Texas:
Prufrock Press, Inc.
Kessler, R. (2000). The soul of education: Helping students find connection, compassion, and
character at school. Virginia Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Mayers, R. (2003). Learning and instruction. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
McDonald, J. (2002). Is "as good as face-to-face" as good as it gets? Journal of Asynchronous
Learning Networks, 6(2), 10-15. Retrieved May 14, 2008, from:
http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v6n2/v6n2_macdonald.asp.
Mills, S. C., & Ragan, T. J. (2000). A tool for analyzing implementation fidelity of an integrated
learning system. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 21-41.
Yousef Ahmed Eyadat & Waleed Mustafa Eyadat / World Journal on Educational Technology (2010) 87-99
99
Prentice, R. (2000). Creativity: A reaffirmation of its place in early childhood education. The
Curriculum Journal, 11(2), 145-158.
Roach, R. (1999). The higher education technology revolution. Black Issues in Higher Education, 3, 8-
21.
Ryan, S. (2001). Is online learning right for you? American Agent & Broker, 73(6), 54-58.
Koh, K. (2000). Indexing creativity fostering teacher Behavior: A preliminary validation study. Journal
of Creative Behavior, 34, 118-134.
Schacter, J., & Fagnano, C. L. (1999). Does computer technology improve student learning and
achievement? How, when, and under what conditions? Journal of Educational Computing
Research, 20(4), 329-343.
Shuell, T. J., & Farber, S. L. (2001). Students’ perceptions of technology use in college courses.
Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24, 21-30.
Starko, A. J. (2001). Creativity in the classroom. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stenberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of
conformity. New York: The free Press.
Solomon, G. (2003). Project-based learning: A primer. Technology and Learning, 23, 20-30.
Swaidan, T. S., & Adlony, M. (2002). Mabadi-Al-Ebdae (The essence of creativity). Kuwait: Gulf
Innovation Co.
Tennent, L., & Barthelsen, D. (1997). Creativity: What does it mean in the family context? Journal of
Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 1, 91-104.
Wolfe, P. (2001). Brain matters: Translating research into classroom practice. Alexandria, VA:
Association for Supervision

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com