Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Experience in applying educational technologies to the integrated system of engineering students

Journal Name:

  • World Journal on Educational Technology

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Some evolutional aspects of the institution currently known as Siberian State Aerospace University are presented as an example of degradation of the integrated system of engineering training and the entire engineering education on the way from planned to market economy. Prospects for some educational technologies expected earlier to raise university graduates’ competency are found out to be doubtful. The analysis of labor market requirements to alumnae shows that no traditional educational technology allows them reach the competence level required by the modern labor market. The existing system of university engineering education is criticized as a whole. Better prospects for preparing engineers have continuing professional training systems at enterprises that still pursue innova-tive projects. The current activity of such a system at Information Satellite Systems Joint-Stock Company as to preparing engineers along the “School-University- Enterprise” line is briefly outlined.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_159831_3_pp_75-89.pdf
  • 2
75-89
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Author, (2006). The influence of educational technologies on the competence level of university
graduates. Bulletin of Russian Education Academy Ural Department, 3, 51-60.
Author, (2010) Development of a continuing training system at Information Satellite Systems Joint
Stock Company. Siberian Journal of Pedagogy (Novosibirsk) 3, 123-128.
Authors, (2010) Technique to estimate the competence level of the integrated training system
graduates and the educational technologies to increase it. Journal of Siberian Federal
University (Humanities &Social Sciences series) 3, 475-483.
Baker, D. (1998). Equity issues in science education. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.) International
Handbook on science education (pp.869-895), Boston: Kluver.
Bancroft, W. (1978). The Lozanov Method & its American Adaptation. The Modem Language Journal,
4,167-175.
Bloom, B. (1971). Mastery learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Burbules, N., Linn, M. (1991). Science education and philosophy of science. International Journal of
Science Education, 13(3), 227 – 241.
Dewey, J. (2009). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New
York: WLC Books.
Hutorskoy, A. (1998). Heuristic training: theory, methodology and practice. Moscow: International
Pedagogical Academy.
Ibragimov, G. (1995). On the Concentrated Training Technology. The specialist, 1, 69-77.
Information Satellite Systems Joint Stock Company. Retrived April 2011 from: www.issreshetnev.
com
Klarin, M. (1989). Educational technologies in the learning process. Moscow: Znanie.
Pokholkov, Yu. (2010). Engineering thought in Russia: an interrupted flight. Accreditation in
Education, 4, 27-29.
Robinson, M. (1992). Mastery learning in public schools: Some areas of restructuring. Education,
113(1), 121-126.
Sokolova, E. (1997). “France-Russia” Pedagogy Workshops. Moscow: Novaya Shkola.
Vazina, K. (1990). Collective brain-activity: the model of human self-development. Moscow:
Pedagogica.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com