Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Project-based learning as a facilitator to promote students’ technology competencies

Journal Name:

  • World Journal on Educational Technology

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Due to the close relationship between educational technology as a field of study on the one hand and technological progress as a fact on the other, the very nature of this field has undergone tremendous shift which has resulted in a transmogrification, changes which are evinced by the roles of educational technologist. Therefore, not only should educational technology training centers aim at transferring concepts related to this major to learners, but they should also focus on developing basic skills that students need, such as technological competencies.This article sought to examine the effects of project-based learning strategy (PoBL) on students’ technology competency in a system-based education course offered in the educational technology department of Arak University in Iran. In order to achieve this end, a sample of 78 students majoring in the field of educational technology who enrolled in the system-based education course was selected. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the experimental group (PoBL strategy) and the control group (conventional teaching strategy). The educational course involved 12 sessions over the course of one semester of the 2011-2012 academic year, with each session lasting approximately 90 minutes. The technology competency questionnaire was administrated three times (i.e. pretest, post-test one, and post-test two), while the experimental group received the PoBL strategy and the control group was exposed to conventional teaching (CT) methods. The results of two way repeated measure ANOVA revealed that students who were taught using Poll strategy performed better in terms of technology competency compared to students who were taught using CT strategy.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_159831_5_pp_207-214.pdf
  • 1
207-214
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Davidson, J. (2003). A new role in facilitating school reform: The case of the educational technologist. The
Teachers College Record, 105(5), 729-752.
Cavanaugh, C. (2004). Project-based Learning in Undergraduate Educational Technology. Journal of Technology
and Teacher Education, 1, 210-216.
Gultekin, M. (2005). The effect of project based learning on learning outcomes in the 5th grade social studies
course in primary education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 5(2), 548-556.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology
Review, 16(3), 235-266.
Izmirli, O. S., & Kurt, A. A. (2009). Basic competencies of instructional technologists. Procedia Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 1, 998–1002. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.178.
Karaman, S., & Celik, S. (2008). An exploratory study on the perspectives of prospective computer teachers
following project-based learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18(2), 203-215.
Bagheri, M., Ali, W., Z., W., Abdullah, M., C. & Daud, S., M. (2013). Project-based learning as a facilitator to
promote students’ technology competencies, World Journal on Educational Technology. 5, 207-214
214
Land, S., & Greene, B. (2000). Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: A quali¬tative study of resource
integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(1), 45-66.
Moursund, D. (2003). Project-based learning using information technology. International Society for Technology
in Education Eugene, OR.
Salpeter, J. (2003). 21st century skills: Will our students be prepared? Technology and Learning-Dayton-, 24(3),
17-29.
Scarbrough, H., Bresnen, M., Edelman, L. F., Laurent, S., Newell, S., & Swan, J. (2004). The Processes of Projectbased
Learning. Management Learning, 35(4), 491-506.
Sendag, S., & Ferhan OdabasI, H. (2009). Effects of an online problem based learn¬ing course on content
knowledge acquisition and critical thinking skills. Computers & Education, 53(1), 132-141.
Seo, K., Templeton, R., & Pellegrino, D. (2008). Creating a ripple effect: Incorporating multimedia-assisted
project-based learning in teacher education. Theory Into Practice, 47(3), 259-265.
Sidman-Taveau, R.L. (2005). Computer-assisted project based learning in second language: case studies in adult
ESL. The University of Texas at Austin.
Sugar, W. (2005). Instructional technologist as a coach: Impact of a situated professional development program
on teachers' technology use. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 547.
Surry, D. W., & Robinson, M. A. (2001). A taxonomy of instructional technology service positions in higher
education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(3), 231-238.
Tennyson, R. (2001). Defining core competencies of an instructional technologist. Com¬puters in Human
Behavior, 17(4), 355-361.
Thomas, J. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.
Turgut, H. (2008). Prospective science teachers’ conceptualizations about project based learning. International
Journal of Instruction, 1(1), 61-79.
Williams, J. (2003). Computers and project-based learning. Media and Methods, 40(2), 18-20.
Wong, S. L. (2002). Development and Validation of Information Technology (IT) based instrument to measure
teachers' IT preparedness. Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com