Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Tek Kutuplu, Iki Kutuplu Veya Çok Kutuplu Uluslararasi Sistem? Savunma Sanayi Faktörü

UNIPOLAR, BIPOLAR OR MULTIPOLAR INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM? THE DEFENSE INDUSTRY FACTOR

Journal Name:

  • Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2008

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
International system can be defined as a complex system of systems that is comprised of economic, political, scientific, technological and military systems. It is hard to analyze this complex system. It is even harder to forecast its future. Nonetheless, there are factors such as the defense industry and military power that affect the dynamics of the international system much more than other factors. After the Revolution in Military Affairs, which transformed the military paradigm, significance of these factors for international relations increased. In this study, interdependence of international relations, military technology, military power and defense industry was investigated. It was found that the global defense industrial order is a good indicator of balance of power in the international system. Scenarios about the future of the international system were built by the help of scenarios about the future of the global defense industrial order.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Uluslararası sistem, ekonomik, siyasi, bilimsel, teknolojik ve askeri sistemlerden oluşan karmaşık bir sistemler sistemi olarak tanımlanabilir. Bu karmaşık sistemi analiz etmek zordur. Geleceğini tahmin etmek daha da zordur. Bununla beraber, savunma sanayi ve askeri güç gibi uluslararası sistem dinamiklerini diğer faktörlerden çok daha fazla etkileyen faktörler vardır. Askeri paradigmayı dönüştüren Askeri Alanda Devrim’den sonra, bu faktörlerin uluslararası ilişkiler için önemi artmıştır. Bu çalışmada, uluslararası ilişkilerin, askeri teknolojinin, askeri gücün ve savunma sanayinin birbirleriyle olan bağlantıları araştırıldı. Küresel savunma sanayi düzeninin, uluslararası sistemdeki güç dengesinin iyi bir göstergesi olduğu tespit edildi. Uluslararası sistemin geleceğine ilişkin senaryolar, küresel savunma sanayi düzeninin geleceği hakkındaki senaryolar yardımıyla oluşturuldu.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_143240_10_pp_104-123.pdf
  • 1
104-123
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

BAKSHI, Jyotsna. (2006). “India-Russia Defense Co-operation”, Strategic
Analysis, 30 (2), 449-466.
BARANY, Zoltan. (2008). “Resurgent Russia? A Still-Faltering Military,” Policy
Review, 147, 39-51.
BATTILEGA, John et al. (2005). Transformations in Global Defense Markets and
Industries: Implications for the Future of Warfare, Washington, DC:
National Intelligence Council.
BEINART, Peter. (2008). “Balancing Act: The Other Wilsonianism,” World
Affairs, 171 (1), 76-88.
BERGSTEN, C. Fred. (2008). “A Partnership of Equals: How Washington Should
Response to China’s Economic Challenge,” Foreign Affairs, 87 (4), 57-70.
BITZINGER, Richard A. (2004). “Civil-Military Integration and Chinese Military
Modernization,” Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies, 3 (9), 1-4.
Akademik Fener
121
BITZINGER, Richard A. (2007). The China Syndrome: Chinese Military
Modernization and the Rearming of Southeast Asia, Singapore: S.
Rajaratnam School of International Studies.
BLASKO, Dennis J. (2006). The Chinese Army Today: Tradition and
Transformation for the 21st Century, London and New York: Routledge.
BOESE, Wade. (2007). “Taiwan Buys U.S. Arms; U.S. Eyes China”, Arms Control
Today, 37 (6), 43-44.
BOWIE, Christopher J., HAFFA, Robert P., MULLINS, Robert E. (2003). Future
War: What Trends in America’s Post-Cold War Military Conflicts Tell Us
About Early 21st Century Warfare, Washington: Northrop Grumman Cor.
CHEUNG, Tai Ming. (2007, July 13). “The Remaking of the Chinese Defense
Industry and the Rise of the Dual-Use Economy”, Testimony before the
US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Washington.
DEVELOPMENT, CONCEPTS AND DOCTRINE CENTRE (DCDC), the U.K.
Ministry of Defense. (2007) The DCDC Global Strategic Trends
Programme 2007-2036, Third Ed., London: DCDC.
DEFENSE SYSTEMS DAILY. (2000, April 19). “Australia’s Defense Challenges
in the 21st Century”.
DREER, June Teufel. (2007). “China’s Power and Will: The PRC’s Military
Strength and Grand Strategy,’ Orbis, 51 (4), 650-660.
ELWELL, Craig K., LABONTE, Marc, M. MORRISON, Wayne. (2007). Is China
a Threat to the U.S. Economy?, Washington: Congressional Research
Service.
ESCUDE, Carlos. (1998). “An Introduction to Peripheral Realism and its
Implications fort he Interstate System: Argentina and the Condor II Missile
Project,” in S. G. Neuman (ed.) International Relations Theory and the
Third World, New York: St. Martin’s Pres, 55-75.
FEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS (FAS). (2004). Ensuring America’s
Space Security: Report of the FAS Panel on Weapons in Space,
Washington: FAS.
FINKELSTEIN, David M. (2004). “The Chinese People’s Liberation Army in
2020,” The Changing Nature Of Warfare-Global Trends 2020 Conference,
Washington.
FITZGERALD, Mary C. (2001). Russian Military Policy and International
Objectives: Interim Strategies and Plans for Long-Term Systemic Change,
Washington: The John Hopkins SAIS.
GILPIN, Robert. (1981). War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Pres.
Akademik Fener
122
GOMPERT, David C., GODEMENT, Francois, MEDEIROS, Evan S.,
MULVENON, James C. (2005). China on the Move: A Franco-American
Analysis of Emerging Chinese Strategic Policies and Their Consequences
for Transatlantic Relations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
HARTLEY, Keith, SANDLER, Todd. (2003). “The Future of the Defense Firm,”
Kyklos, 56 (3), 361-380.
HUDSON INSTITUTE. (2005) China’s New Great Leap Forward: High
Technology and Military Power in the Next Half-Century, Indiana: Hudson
Institute.
JERVIS, Robert. (2002). “Theories of War in an Era of Leading-Power Peace,”
American Political Science Review, 96 (1), 1-14.
KAMENNOV, Pavel. (2006). “China’s Military Policy: Where Taiwan Fits In,”
Far Eastern Affairs, 34 (1), 62-78.
LAIRD, Robbin. (1999). “The inevitability of global defense industry alliances,” in
Gordon Adams (et al.). Europe’s Defense Industry: A Transatlantic
Future? London: The Center for European Reform.
LAMPTON, David M. (2007). “The Faces of Chinese Power”, Foreign Affairs, 86
(1), 115-127.
MARKUSEN, Ann. (1999). “Should We Welcome a Transnational Defense
Industry?,” American Economic Association/Peace Science sessions, New
York.
MEDEIROS, Evan S., CLIFF, Roger, CRANE, Keith, MULVENON, James C.
(2005). A New Direction for China’s Defense Industry, Santa Monica:
RAND.
MIKHAYLOV, Nikolay. (1998, September 24). “Russia Can Preserve its Status as
a Great Power”, Nezavizimaya Gazeta.
MOCKLI, Daniel. (2007). “The Rise of China: Regional and Global Power Shifts”,
CSS Analyses in Security Policy, 2 (8), 1-3.
MOHANTY, Deha R. (2004). Changing Times? India’s Defense Industry in the 21st
Century, Bonn: Bonn International Center for Conversion.
MULVENON, James, YANG, Richard H. (2003). The People’s Liberation Army in
the Information Age, Santa Monica: RAND.
NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY (NDU). (2007). The Space Industry,
Washington: NDU.
NEUMAN, Stephanie. (2005). “Defense Industries and Dependency: Current and
Future Trends in the Global Defense Sector,” Conference on Israel’s
Strategic Agenda. BESA Center, Bar Ilan University.
NEUMAN, Stephanie G. (2006). “Defense Industries and Global Dependency,”
Orbis, 50 (3), 429-451.
Akademik Fener
123
NICKESON, Jeffrey. (2007). “Has the West Lost the Battle for Central Asia?,”
Defense& Foreign Affairs Strategic Policy, 35 (8), 6-9.
NOLT, James H. (2005). “The Pentagon Plays Its China Card,” World Policy
Journal, 22 (3), 25-33.
POLLACK, Jonathan D. (2007). “Chinese Military Power: What Vexes the United
States and Why?” Orbis, 51 (4), 635-650.
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS. (2005). “The Defense Industry in the 21st
Century: Thinking Global…or thinking American?”
(October 23, 2008).
SANZHIEV, Artem. (2005). “Russian Arms in South Korea,” International Affairs,
51 (4), 125-130.
SARADZHYAN, Simon. (1999, December 13). “Moscow Set to Invest More to
Modernize Weapons,” Defense News.
SINGH, Bhartendu. (2005). “The Political Economy of China’s Defense
Modernization”, Strategic Analysis, 29 (4), 680-705.
TAYLOR, Mark Zachary. (2005). “The Politics of Technological Change:
International Relations versus Domestic Institutions,” Work in Progress
Colloquia, Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Department of Political Science.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. (2006). Quadrennial Defense Review Report,
Washington: Office of the Secretary of Defense.
U.S. OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY. (2006, October 6).
“U.S. National Space Policy”, Washington: U.S. Office of Science and
Technology Policy.
WALDRON, Arthur. (2005). “The Rise of China: military and political
implications,” Review of International Studies, 31, 715-733.
WALTZ, Kenneth N. (1999). “Globalization and Governance,” PS: Political
Science and Politics, 32 (4), 693-700.
WALTZ, Kenneth N. (1979) Theory of International Politics New York: McGraw-
Hill.
WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION (WIPO). (2008,
February 21). “Unprecedented Number of International Patent Filings in
2007,”
< http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2008/article_0006.html > (10.8.2008).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com