Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

TÜRK İMALAT SANAYİİNDE YENİLİKÇİ ETKİNLİKLERİN SAYMA VERİ ANALİZİ KULLANILARAK ARAŞTIRILMASI

EXPLORING INNOVATIVE ACTIVITIES IN TURKISH MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY USING COUNT DATA ANALYSIS

Journal Name:

  • Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2015
DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.11611/JMER411

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the nature of patenting activity in the context of Turkish manufacturing industry. The literature tells us that many variables can be used while investigating patenting or innovative activity. The dependent variable chosen for this study is the number of patent applications per year. Since the dependent variable is a non-negative integer, count data methodology is employed in order to capture the non-linear nature of the data. A conditional fixed effects Poisson panel regression has been estimated for Turkish manufacturing industry for the 2003-2008 period. The results indicate that the evidence from Turkish manufacturing industries support the Schumpeterian theory. Furthermore, R&D expenditures and R&D personnel intensity are important drivers ofpatenting activities. This study encompasses the traditional point of view towards innovative activity; however manages to take this view one step further in terms of the econometric technique used.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı Türk İmalat Sanayiinde patent aktivitesinin doğasını araştırmaktır. Literatürde patentleme veya yenilikçi faaliyetler araştırılırken pek çok değişken kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışma için seçilen bağımlı değişken her bir yıl için patent başvuru sayısıdır. Bağımlı değişken negatif olmayan bir tamsayı olduğu için ve verinin doğrusal olmayan doğasını göz önüne alabilmek için sayma sayı yöntemi kullanılmıştır. 2003-2008 yılları arasında Türk İmalat Sanayii için koşullu sabit etkiler Poisson panel regresyonu tahmin edilmiştir. Türk İmalat Sanayii için elde edilen sonuçlar, Schumpeteryan teoriyi desteklemektedir. Ayrıca, Ar-Ge harcamaları ve Ar-Ge personel .yoğunluğu, patent aktivitesine yön veren önemli faktörlerdir. Bu çalışma, yenilikçi aktivitelerin geleneksel bakış açısını içinde barındırmakla birlikte, kullanılan ekonometrik yöntem bağlamında bu bakış açısını bir adım öteye taşımaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-turk-imalat-sanayiinde-yenilikci-etkinliklerin-sayma-veri-analizi-kullanilarak-arastirilmasi.pdf
  • 1
107
122
  • Turkish

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

Acs, Z. and Audretsch, D. (1987) "Innovation, market structure and firm size", The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71: 567-574.
Baldwin, J.R. and Johnson, J. (1996) "Business strategies in more- and less-innovative firms in Canada", Research Policy, 25: 785-804.
119
Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi - Cilt: 13 Sayı:1 (Ocak 2015) - Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11611/JMER411
Baldwin, J.R., Hanel, P. and Sabourin, D. (2002) "Determinants of innovative activity in Canadian manufacturing firm". In Kleinknecht A. and P. Mohnen (eds.) Innovation and firm performance: Econometric explorations of survey data. Palgrave, New York.
Becheikh, N., Landry, R. and Amara, N. (2006) "Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993-2003", Technovation, 26: 644-664.
Bertschek, I. and Entorf, H. (1996) "On nonparametric estimation of the Schumpeterian link between innovation and firm size: Evidence from Belgium, France and Germany", Empirical Economics, 21: 401-426.
Blundell, R., Griffith, R. and Van Reenen, J. (1995) "Dynamic count data models of technological innovation", The Economic Journal, 105: 333-244.
Cameron, A. and Trivedi, P.K. (1998) "Regression Analysis of Count Data", Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coe, D.T., Helpman, E. and Hoffmaister, A.W. (1997) "North-South R&D Spillovers", The Economic Journal, 107: 134-149.
Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990) "Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152.
Cohen, W.M. and Klepper, S. (1996) "A reprise of firm size and R&D", Economic Journal, 106: 925¬951.
Crepon, B., Duguet, E. and Mairesse, J. (1998) "Research, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7:
115-158.
Damanpour, F. (1992) "Organizational size and innovation", Organization Studies, 13: 375-402.
Evangelista, R., Sandven, T., Sirilli, G. and Smith, K. (1998) "Measuring innovation in European industry", International Journal of the Economics of Business, 5: 311-333.
François,
J.P.
, Favre, F. and Negassi, S. (2002) "Competence and organization: two drivers of innovation. A micro-econometric study", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11:
249-270.
Graves, S.B. and Langowitz, N.S. (1996) "R&D productivity: A global multi-industry comparison", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 53: 125-137.
Greene, W.H. (2002) "Econometric Analysis", Pearson Inc. New Jersey.
120
Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi - Cilt: 13 Sayı:1 (Ocak 2015) - Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11611/JMER411
Griliches, Z.
(1990
) "Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey", Journal of Economic Literature, 28: 1661-1707.
Hausman, J.A., Hall, B., and Griliches, Z. (1984) "Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship", Econometrica, 52:909-938.
Kamien, M.I. and Schwarz, N.L. (1982) "Market Structure and Innovation", Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kleinknecht, A., Van Montfort, K. and Brouwer, E. (2002) "The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11: 109-121.
Kumar, N. and Saqib, M. (1996) "Firm size, opportunities for adaptation and in-house R&D activity in developing countries: The case of Indian Manufacturing", Research Policy, 25: 713-722.
Landry, R., Amara, N. and Lamari, M. (2002) "Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent?", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69: 681-701.
Montobbio, F. and Sterzi, V. (2013) "The Globalization of Technology in Emerging Markets: A Gravity Model on the Determinants of International Patent Collaborations", World Development, 44: 281-299.
Negassi, S. and Shiri, G.A. (2012) "Entrepreneurial Activity, Entry and Persistence of Firms: Econometric Analysis Based on Count Data", Technology and Investment, 3:87-104.
Pavitt, K., Robson, M. and Townsend, J. (1987) "The size distribution of innovation firms in the UK: 1945-1983", Journal of Industrial Economics, 35: 297-316.
Peeters, C. and de la Potterie, B.P. (2006) "Innovation strategy and the patenting behavior of firms", Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16: 109-134.
Raymond, L. and St-Pierre, J. (2010) "R&D as a determinant of innovation in manufacturing SMEs: An attempt at empirical clarification", Technovation, 30: 48-56.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934) "The Theory of Economic Development", Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1942) "Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy", Harper: New York.
Souitaris, V. (2002) "Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-level determinants of innovation", Research Policy, 31: 877-898.
Stock, G.N., Greis, N.P. and Fischer, W.A. (2002) "Firm size and dynamic technological innovation",
Technovation, 22: 537-459.
Weerawardena, J. and Mavondo, F.T. (2011) "Capabilities, innovation and competitive advantage", Industrial Marketing Management, 40: 1220-1223.
121
Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi - Cilt: 13 Sayı:1 (Ocak 2015) - Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11611/JMER411
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002) "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data", London: MIT Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com