Aypay, A., Erdogan, M. ve Sozer, M.A (2007). Variation among schools on classroom
practices in science based on TIMSS–1999 in Turkey. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 44 (10), 1417-1435.
Amos, S., Boohan, R., ve Open University. (2002). Aspects of teaching secondary
science:Perspectives on practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Bosker, R.J., ve Witziers, B. (1996, Nisan). The magnitude of school effects. or: Does it
really matter which school a student attends? Annual Meeting of the American
Educational Research Association konferansında sunulmuş bildiri, New York, USA.
Ceylan, E. ve Berberoğlu, G. (2007). Factors related with students’ science achievement: A
modeling study, Education & Science, 32, 36-48.
Creemers, B. P. M., ve Reezigt, G. J. (2005). Linking school effectiveness and school
improvement: The background and outline of the project. School Effectiveness and
School Improvement, 16, 359–371.
Caccovo, F. (2001). Teaching introductory microbiology with active learning. American
Biology Teacher, 63, 172-174.
Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfield, F., ve
York, R. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S.
Government Printing Office.
D’ Agostino, J. J. (2000). Instructional and school effects on students’ longitudinal reading
and mathematics achievements. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11,
197-235.
George, D. ve Mallery, P. (2006). SPSS for Windows: Step by step (Altıncı Baskı.).
Boston: Pearson A and B.
Gibson, H. L. (1998). Case studies of an inquiry-based science programs’ impact on
students’ attitudes towards science and interest in science careers. ERIC document
reproduction service no. ED 417 980.
Green, S.B., Salkind, N.J. ve Akey, T.M. (2000). Using SPSS for windows: Analyzing and
understanding data (İkinci Baskı). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V. ve Lane, R. D. (1996). The effects of school resources on
student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66, 361-396.
Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public
schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1141-1177.
Hanushek, E. A. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance.
Educational Researches, 18, 45-51.
Kahle, J. B., Meece, J. ve Scantlebury, K. (2000). Urban African American middle school
science students: Does standards-based teaching make a difference? Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1019-104.
Konstantopoulos, S. (2006). Trends of school effects on student achievement: Evidence
from NLS:72, HSB:82, and NELS:92. Teachers College Record, 108, 2550-2581.
Leung, F.K. (2002). Behind the high achievement of East Asian students. Educational
Research and Evaluation, 8, 87-108.
Lokan, J. ve Greenwood, L. (2000). Mathematics achievement at lower secondary level in
Australia. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26,9-26.
Luyten, H., Visscher, A. ve Witziers, B. (2005). School effectiveness research: From a
review of the criticism to recommendations for further development. School
Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 249–379.
Mere, K., Reiska, P. ve Smith, T.M. (2006). Impact of SES on Estonian students ‘ science
achievement across different cognitive domains. Prospects: Quarterly Review of
Comparative Education, 36, 497-516.
Morrell, P.D. ve Lederman, N.G. (1998). Students' attitudes toward school and classroom
science: Are they independent? School Science and Mathematics, 98, 76-82.
Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D. ve Ecob, R. (1988). School matters.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Nolen, S.B. (2003). Learning environment, motivation, and achievement in high school
science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 347-368.
Odom L.A., Stoddard, E.R., ve La Nasa, S.M. (2007). Teacher practices and middle-school
science achievements. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1329-1346.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2007). PISA 2006 Science
Competencies for Tomorrows’ World, Volume 1-2, Author, Paris, France.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2009). PISA 2006 Technical
Report, Author, Paris, France.
Papanastasiou, C. ve Papanastasiou, E.C. (2004). Major influences on attitudes towards
science. Educational Research and Evaluation. 10, 239-257.
Papanastasiou, C. (2002). School, teaching, and family influence on students attitude
toward science: Based on TIMSS data on Cyprus. Studies in Educational
Evaluation, 28, 71-86.
Papanastasiou, C. (2008). A residual analysis of effective schools and effective teaching in
mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34, 24-30.
Papanastasiou, E. C. ve Ferdig, R. E. (2003). Computer use and mathematical literacy. An
analysis of existing and potential relationships. Third Mediterranean Conference on
Mathematical Education konferansında yayımlanan bildiri, Athens, Hellas: Hellenic
Mathematical Society, 335–342.
Papanastasiou,E.C., Zembylas, M. ve Vrasidas, C. (2003). Can computer use hurt science
achievement? The USA Results from PISA. Journal of Science Education and
Technology,12, 325-332
Pelgrum, W.J. ve Plomp, T. (2002). Indicators of ICT in mathematics: Status and
covariation with achievement measures. In D.F. Robitaille & A.E. Beaton (Eds.),
Secondary analysis of the TIMSS data (ss. 317-330). Dordrecht, Netherlands:
Kluwer.
Rosenholtz, S. J. (1985). Effective schools: Interpreting the evidence. American Journal of
Education, 93, 352–388.
Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., Ousten, J. ve Smith, A. (1979). Fifteen thousand
hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Scheerens, J. ve Creemers, B. P. M. (1989). Conceptualizing school effectiveness.
International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 691–706.
Schmidt, W.H., Jorde, D., Barrier, E., Gonzalo, I., Moser, U. ve Shimizu, K. (1996).
Characterizing pedagogical flow: An investigation of mathematics and science
teaching in six countries. Dordrect, The Netherlands: Kluver.
Stright, A.D. ve Supplee, L.H. (2002). Children's self-regulatory behaviors during teacherdirected,
seat-work, and small-group instructional contexts. Journal of Educational
Research, 95, 235-244
Tabachnick, B.G. ve Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (Dördüncü Baskı.).
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Teddlie, C. ve Stringfield, S. (1993). Schools make a difference: Lessons learned from a 10
year study of school effects. New York: Teachers College Press.
Van de Grift, W. J. C. M. ve Houtveen, A. A. M. (2006). Underperformance in primary
schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17, 255–273.
Von Secker, C. ve Lissitz, R. W. (1999). Estimating the impact of instructional practices on
student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1110–
1126.
White, K. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic
achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461-481.
White, S. W., Reynolds, P. D., Thomas, M. M. ve Gitzlaff, N.J. (1993). Socioeconomic
status and achievement revisited. Urban Education, 28, 328-343.
Yayan, B. ve Berberoğlu, G. (2004). A Re-Analysis of the TIMSS 1999 Mathematics
Assessment Data of the Turkish Students. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 30,
87-104.
Yuretich, R.F., Khan, S.A., ve Leckie, R.M. (2001). Active-learning methods to improve
student performance and scientific interest in a large introductory oceanography
course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 49, 111-119.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com
