You are here

FORMULATION AN D EVALUATION OF SUSTAINED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS OF CANDESARTAN CILEXETIL

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
To formulate and evaluate the sustained release matrix tablet of Candesartan cilexetil using different ratio of hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymers in order to increase the drug bioavailability, therapeutic efficiency, reduce dosing frequency and improvement of patient compliance. Different formulations were prepared by wet granulation method using various release rate controlling hydrophilic polymer like HPMC K 15M, HPMC K 100M and hydrophobic polymers like ethyl cellulose. Drug-excipients compatibility was carried out by FTIR. Different formulations were evaluated for hardness, thickness, friability, swelling index, drug content and in vitro drug release. Mathematical analysis of the release kinetics was carried out to determine the mechanism of drug release. In vitro release data was fitted to various models to ascertain the kinetic of drug release. Response surface graph was prepared to examine the effect of independent variable on dependent variable.

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Gudas GK, Bingi M, Subaldenath and Santosh kumar C:
Design
an
d evaluation of controlled release mucoadhesive buccal tablet of candesartan. IJPI's J. Pharm. Cosm. 2011; 1: 125-130.
2.
Akula G,
Saikrishn
a K, Bhupati S, Rasapally R and Santhoshkumar K: RP-HPLC method development and validation of candesartan cilexetil in bulk and their pharmaceutical dosage form. Int. J. Pharm.
Sci. Res. 2010; 1: 191-196.
3.
Pati
l BS, Rao RN, Jadhav S, Kulkarni U and Gada MM: Estimation of candesartan cilexetil in bulk and tablet dosage forms by UV spectrophotometric method. Int. J. Res.
Ayur. Pharm. 2011; 2: 204-206.
4. Drug profile of candesartan cilexetil, December 2011. http://www.drugs.com/ppa/Candesartan- cilexetil.html.
5. Chib R, Sonkar M and Hooda A: Design, formulation and evaluation of sustained release dosage form. Drug Invention Today.
2010; 2: 397-399.
6. Baeumer B, Chatterjee L, Hinow P, Rades T, Radunskaya A and Tucker I: Predicting the drug release kinetics of matrix tablets, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems Series B. 2009; 12: 261-277.
7. Trivedi ND, Trivedi UN, Patel MM, Patel JK and Bhandari A: Preparation and evaluation of floating matrix tablet of ranitidine. Amer. J. Drug. Disco. Dev. 2011;
1: 8-23.
8. Keny RV, Mankame SA and Lourenco CF: Formulation and evaluation of once daily minocycline hydrochloride extended release matrix tablets. Ind. J. Pharm. Sci.
2009; 71: 295-302.
9. Prasanth Sai RV, Pujitha I, Perreddy K and Pradeep Chandra K: Formulation, evaluation and characterization of sustained release matrix tablets of timolol maleate using hydrophilic, hydrophobic and plastic polymers. Int. J. Pharm. Tech. 2011;
3: 2807-2847.
10. Darunkaisorn W and Phaechamud T: Sustained release of propranolol HCl using
Available Online At www.ijprbs.com
Research Article
Dhrupesh Panchal, IJPRBS, 2012; Volume 1(4): 75-101
ISSN: 2277-8713
IJPRBS
matrix granule comprising wax and polymers. Res. J. Pharm. Bio. Chem. Sci. 2011; 2: 158-166.
11.
Shoai
b MH, Tazeen J, Merchant HA and Yousuf RI: Evaluation of drug release kinetics from ibuprofen matrix tablet using hpmc, Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2006; 19: 119-124.
12. Archita
M
, Kishor R, Madhubabu D and Reddy PV: Design and in vitro evaluation of sustained release matrix tablets of timolol maleate. Amer. J. Pharm. Res. 2011; 1: 339¬354.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com