You are here

EVAULATION OF BEGINNING READING AND WRITING SOFTWARES

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study to evaulate the beginning reading and writing software. In the study, documant review which is one of the qualitative research techniques was used. Nine beginning reading-writing softwares randomly selected from the education software CD’s used in teaching of reading-writing in primary education of first grade students constituted the study group of the research. In analysis of the data, beginning readingwriting softwares were analysed through content analysed. The assessment instrument is formed of three parts including the use of software, the stages of teaching reading-writing and technical properties. As a consequence, it was observed that the softwares are not sufficient in terms of technical properties when the beginning reading writing educational softwares are examined. The activities to ensure the student participation were included in C, G and H softwares but the number of activities can be increased. The elements to boost the learner’s motivation are much more needed. Reading practices were more included in the softwares than writing practices. Reading-writing stages were followed in C, G and H softwares. Student participation can be encouraged and feedback, photographs, active songs and animation to boost the student’s motivation can be employed. The softwares where students can record what s/he has done, in which s/he can continue from where s/he left and where s/he can take the printouts of what s/he has done can be developed.
15-38

REFERENCES

References: 

Akyol, H. (2006). Türkçe İlkokuma Yazma Öğretimi. (5
th
ed.). Ankara: A Pegem Publications.
Baker, E. A. (2003). Integrating literacy and technology: Making a match between sotware and classroom.
Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 193-197.
Balajthy, E. (1997). Commercial literacy software trends 1996. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13 (1), 87-93.
Balajthy, E. (2005). Text-to-speech software for helping struggling readers. Reading Online, 8(4). Retrieved from
http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=balajthy2/index...
Biggs, M. C., Homan, S. P., Dedrick, R. & Minick, V. (2008). Using interactive singing-software pogram: A
comparative study of struggling middle school readers. Reading Psychology, 29, 195-213.
Bilgin, N. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde İçerik Analizi Teknikler ve Örnek Çalışmalar. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9 (2),
27-40.
Case, C. & Truscott, D. M. (1999). The lure of bells and whistles: Choosing the best software are to support
reading instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 15, 361-369.
Castellani, J. , Jeff, T. (2001). Emerging reading and writing strategies using technology. Teaching Exceptional
Children, 33 (5), 60-67.
Dresang, E. T. & McClelland, K. M. (1999). Radical Change: Digital Age Literature and Learning. Theory Into
Practice, 38 (3), 160-167.
Haugland, S. (1997a). Children’s home computer use: An opportunity for Parent/Teacher collaboration. Early
Childhood Education Journal, 25 (2), 133-135.
Haugland, S. (1997b). Outstanding developmental software. Computers and Young Children, 24 (3), 179-184.
Haugland, S. W. (2005). Selecting or upgrading software and web sites in the classroom. Early Childhood
Education Journal, 32 (5), 329-340.
Haugland, S.W., Bailey, M. D. & Ruiz, E. A. (2002). The outstanding developmental software and web sites for
2001. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29 (3), 191-200.
Haugland, S. W. & Ruiz, E. A. (2002). Empowering Children with tecnology: outstanding developmental
software for 2002. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30 (2), 125-132.
Jimenez, J. M. (1997). Learning to read. Unpublished Master Thessis. Masters of Arts in Education: Computer
Based Education. Faculty of California State University.
Judge, S. , Puckett, K. and Bell, S. M. (2006). Closing the Digital Divide: Update From the Early Childhood
Longitudinal Study. The Journal of Educational Research, 100 (1), 52 – 60.
Karamaker, A. M., Pitchford, N.J. & O’Malley, C. (2010). Does whole-word multimedia software support literacy
acquisition? Read Writ., 23, 31-51.
Karchmer, R. A. (2001). The journey ahead: Thirteen teachers report how the internet influences literacy and
literacy instruction in their K-12 classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 36 (4), 442-466.
Kazancı, Z., Okan, Z. (2009). Evaulating english language teaching software for kids:Education or entertainment
or both? The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Techonology, [On-line], 8 (3). Retrieved from
http://www.tojet.net.
Kazu, İ. Y. & Yavuzalp, N. (2008). Teachers’ Opinions About using instructional software. Education & Science,
33 (150), 110- 126.
Kim, A., Woodruff, A. L., Klein, C. & Vaughn, S. (2006). Facilitating co-teaching for literacy in general education
classrooms through technology: Focus on students with learning disabilities. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22,
269-291.
Lovell, M. & Phillips, L. (2009). Commercial sofware programs approved for teaching reading and writing in the
primary grades: Another sobering reality. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42 (2), 197-216.
McKenna, M. C. (2002). Phonics software for a new millenium. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 18, 93-96.
Mckenzi, J. (2003). Beyond Edutainment and Technotainment. The Journal for Quality & Participation, Winter,
26-28.
Medwell, J. (1998). The talking boks Project: Some further insights into the use of talking boks to develop
reading. Reading, April, 3-8.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). California: Sage Publications.
Nikolopoulou, K. (2007). Early childhood educational software: specific features and ıssues of localization. Early
Chilhood Education Journal, 35 (2), 173- 179.
Oakley, G. (2002). Using CD-ROM 'electronic talking books' to help children with mild reading difficulties
improve their reading fluencg. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 7( 4), 20-27.
Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use Qualitative methods in evaulation. California: Sage Publications.
Polonoli, K. E. (2000). What makes educational software educational? Virginia Society of Tecnology in Education
Journal, 15 (1), 6-31. ED 453 827.
Santoro, L. E. & Bishop, M. J. (2010). Selecting software with caution: an emperical evaulation of popular
beginning reading software for children with early literacy difficulties. Computers in Schools, 27, 99-120.
Sawyer, T. L. (1999). A study of the use of reading sofware in the classroom. Master’s Action Research Project,
Johnson Bible College. ED 432736.
Shamir, A. & Korat, O. (2006). How to select CD-ROM storybooks for young children: The teacher’s role. The
Reading Teacher, 59 (6), 532-544.
Topping, K. J. & McKenna, M. C. (1999). Introduction to electronic literacy-Part 1. Reading & Writing Ouarterly,
15, 107-110.
Underwood, J. D. M. (2000). A comparison of two types of computer support for reading development. Journal
of Research in Reading, 23(2), 136-148.
Wepner, S. B. & Bowes, K. A. (2004). Using assistive technology for literacy development. Reading & Writing
Quarterly, 20, 219-223.
Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (5
th
ed.). Ankara: Seçkin
Publications.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com