You are here

ENHANCEMENT IN EVALUATING SMALL GROUP WORK IN COURSES WITH LARGE NUMBER OF STUDENTS. MACHINE THEORY AT INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING DEGREES

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.55
Abstract (2. Language): 
This article examines new tutoring evaluation methods to be adopted in the course, Machine Theory, in the Escola Tècnica Superior d’Enginyeria Industrial de Barcelona (ETSEIB, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya). These new methods have been developed in order to facilitate teaching staff work and include students in the evaluation process. Machine Theory is a required course with a large number of students. These students are divided into groups of three, and required to carry out a supervised work constituting 20% of their final mark. These new evaluation methods were proposed in response to the significant increase of students in spring semester of 2010-2011, and were pilot tested during fall semester of academic year 2011-2012, in the previous Industrial Engineering degree program. Pilot test results were highly satisfactory for students and teachers, alike, and met proposed educational objectives. For this reason, the new evaluation methodology was adopted in spring semester of 2011-2012, in the current bachelor’s degree program in Industrial Technology (Grau en Enginyeria en Tecnologies Industrials, GETI), where it has also achieved highly satisfactory results.
11-22

REFERENCES

References: 

Álvarez-Méndez, J.M. (2001). Evaluar para conocer, examinar para excluir. Madrid, Morata.
Andrade, H. (2005) Teaching with rubrics. College Teaching, 53(1), 27-30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.1.27-31
Blanco, A. (2008). Las rúbricas: un instrumento útil en la evaluación de competencias. Into Prieto, L. et al., La
enseñanza universitaria centrada en el aprendizaje: estrategias útiles para el profesorado, Barcelona, ICE-UB.
Cardona, S. & Jordi, L. (2003). Presentació d’informes científics i tècnics. http://em.upc.edu/docencia/estudisde-
grau/etseib/teoria-de-maquines/fascicles-i-normes/presentacio-dinformes
Del Canto, P., Gallego, I., López, J.M., Medina, E., Monchón, F., Mora, J. et al. (2011). Follow-up and feedback
processes in the EHEA. Journal of technology and science education, 1(1), 12-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2011.14
Gibbs, G. & Simpson, C. (2009). Condiciones para una evaluación continuada favorecedora del aprendizaje.
Colección: Cuadernos de docencia universitaria, 13. Barcelona: ICE-UB and Ediciones octaedro.
http://www.octaedro.com/ice/pdf/13CUADERNO.pdf
Institut de Ciències de l’Educació (ICE), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) (2008a). L’avaluació en el
marc de l’Espai Europeu d’Educació Superior (EEES). http://www.upc.edu/ice/portal-derecursos/
publicacions_ice/monografics-ice
Institut de Ciències de l’Educació (ICE), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) (2008b). Guia per
desenvolupar les competències genèriques en el disseny de titulacions. Treball en equip.
http://www.upc.edu/ice/portal-de-recursos/publicacions_ice/guies-per-des...
en-el-disseny-de-titulacions
Machine Theory Informational sheet. https://em.upc.edu/docencia/estudis-de-grau/etseib/teoria-demaquines/
full-informatiu-10-11-qp/view
Singhose, W. & Donnell, J. (2009). Introductory Mechanical Design Tools. Georgia Institute of Technology.
Student Evaluation of Educational Quality Questionnaire SEEQ. https://www.upc.edu/ice/portal-derecursos/
eines_i_recursos/eines-upc/enquesta-de-satisfaccio-seeq

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com