You are here

Home » Content

EVRİM ÖĞRETİMİ İÇİN MODEL ÖNERİSİ: SOYAĞACI, HAT MODELİ VE EL MODELİ OLUŞTURMA

A MODEL SUGGESTION FOR TEACHING EVOLUTION: DEVELOPING CLADOGRAM, LINE MODEL AND HAND MODEL

Journal Name:

  • Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this article is to propose a credible teaching method for the theory of evolution. Cladogram activity is a model used often in biological sciences, especially in evolotuion laboratories. In cladogram activities, students will have an opportunity to understand the similarities and differences among characteristics of living things. Thereby they better will perceive the concept of biological diversity and evolution. By using the line model and especially the hand model the students will be given the opportunity to understand basic processes of evolotuion, and also to correct their preconception that members of a species have evolved directly from those of other species and to replace it with the scientific knowledge that populations have evolved over time. In this study, the activities that embrace inquiry-based and student-centered atmosphere are presented in the frame of constructivism
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makale, evrim teorisi hakkında geçerli olabileceğini düşündüğümüz öğretim modelleri önermektedir. Önerilen modellerden soyağacı çalışması biyoloji biliminde, evrim laboratuvarlarında uygulanan bir modellemedir. Soyağacı çalışmasıyla öğrenciler, canlılardaki özelliklerin benzerlik ve farklılık ilişkilerini algılama fırsatı bularak; biyolojik çeşitlilik ve evrim kavramlarını daha anlamlı öğreneceklerdir. Hat modeli ve özellikle el modeli uygulamaları ise, evrimin temel mekanizmasının algılanmasını; " bir türün bireylerinin doğrudan bir diğer türün bireylerinden evrimleştiği" yanılgısı yerine "zamanla populasyonların evrimleştiği" bilimsel bilgisinin öğrenilmesini sağlayacaktır. Çalışmada yapılandırıcılık çerçevesi içerisinde sorgulama temelli ve öğrenci merkezliliği kapsayacak etkinlikler sunulmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon uvt_71783.pdf
  • 1
95-108
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Alles, D.
(2001)
. Using evolution as the framework for teaching biology. The American Biology Teacher, 63 (1), 20-24.
Alters, B. J., ve Nelson, C., E. (2002). Perspective: teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution, 56 (10), 1891-1901.
Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K.M. ve Norman, G.J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 952-978.
Anderson, O. R., Randle, D. ve Covotos, T. (2001). The role of ideational networks in laboratory inquiry learning end knowledge of evolution among seventh grade students.
Science Education, 85, 410-425.
Batuhan, H. (1993).
Bilim
ve şarlatanlık. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
Bishop, B. A., ve Anderson, C., W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415-427.
Blackwell, W. H., Powell, M., J., ve Dukes, G., H. (2003). The problem of student acceptance of evolution. Journal of Biological Education, 37 (2.), 58-67.
Brem, S.
K.
, Ranney, M. ve Schindel, J. (2002). Perceived consequences of evolution: College students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science Education, 20, 1-26.
Brumby, M. N. (1984). Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Science Education, 68, 493¬503.
Cherif, A., Adams, G. ve Loehr, J. (2001). What on "earth" is evolution? The geological perspective of teaching evolutionary biology effectively. The American Biology Teacher, 63
(8), 569-591.
Cobern, W. W. (1994). Belief, understanding,
and the teaching of evolution. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 31, 583-590.
Crawford, B. A., Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D. ve Friedrichsen, P. (2005). Confronting prospective teachers' ideas of evolution and scientific inquiry using tecnology and inquiry-based tasks. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 42 (6), 613-637.
Dagher, Z. R. ve BouJaoude, S. (1997).
Scientific views and religious beliefs of collage students: The case of biological evolution.
Journal for Researh in Science Teaching, 34,
429-445.
Dagher, Z. R. ve BouJaoude, S. (2005).
Students' perceptions of the nature of evolutionary theory. Science Education, 89,
378-391.
Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution.
The American Biology Teachers, 35, 125-129.
Eichinger, D. C. ve Nakhleh, M. B. (2000).
Evaluating computer lab models for large biology courses. Journal of Computer in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 19, 253¬276.
Elstgeest, J. (1985). The right question at the right time. In Harlen, W. (Ed.). Primary science: Taking the plunge. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.
Evolution, systematics, and cladograms. www.sci.scdsu.edu/classes/bio201/lab 1/lab 1 .pdf 'den 25.5.2005 tarihinde indirilmiştir.
Fleer, M. ve Hardy T. (2001). Science for Children: Developing a personal approach to teaching. Australia: Prentice Hall.
Gould, T. (1982). Darwinism and the expansion
o
f evolutionary theory. Science, 216, 380-387.
Gould,
S
. J. (2000). Darwin ve sonrası: Doğa tarihi üzerine düşünceler. (C. Temürcü, Trans.). Ankara: Tübitak.
Ingram, E., L. ve Nelson, C., E. (2006). Relationship between achievement and students' acceptance of evolution or creation in an upper-level evolution course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 7-24.
Jackson, D. F. (2000). Shifting the relationship between personal and professional beliefs and practices with regard to evolution and religion: Three years of feedback from prospective middle school secience teachers. Paper
- 107 -
Zeki Apaydın... / Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, (2006), 95-108
presented of the meeting of the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
Jonsson, L. (1992). Birds of europe. London:
Helm.
Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science teaching of the development thinking. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.
Mayr, E. (1954). Change of Genetic Environment and Evolution. In the Evolution as a Process (157-180). London: Allen and Unwin.
Meadows, L., Doster, E., ve Jackson, D., F. (2000). Managing the conflict between evolution and religion. American Biology Teacher, 62, 102-107.
Moore, R., Mitchell, G., Bally, R., Inglis, M., Day, J.ve Jacobs, D. (2002). Undergraduates understanding of evolution: ascription of agency as a problem for student learning. Journal of Biological Education, 36 (2), 65-71.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standarts. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nelson, C. E ve Skehan, J. W. (2000). Effective
strategies for teaching evolution and other controversial topics. In The creation controversy and the science classroom, (pp. 19¬50). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Norris, S. ve Phillips, L. (1994). Interpreting pragmatic meaning when reading popular reports of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31 , 947-967.
Orstein, A. C. ve Hunkins, F. P. (1993).
Curriculum: Foundations, principles and issues. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Özlem, D. (2003). Bilim felsefesi ders notları. İstanbul: İnkılap.
Passmore, C. ve Stewart, J. (2002). A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (3), 185-204.
Rudolph J. L. ve Stewart J. (1998). Evolution and the nature of science: on the historical discord and it's implications for education.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35 (10), 1069-1089.
Russell, B. (2001). Bilimin toplum
üzerindeki
etkileri (E. Esençay, Trans.). İzmir: İlya.
Scharmann, L. C.
(1990)
. Enhancing and understanding of the premises of evolutionary theory: The influence of a diversyfied instructional strategy. School Science
Mathematics, 90, 91-100.
Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S., A., McConaughy, F., ve Demastes, J., W. (2003).
Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 510-528.
Sinclair, A., Pendarvis, M. P., ve Baldwin, B. (1997). The relationship between college zoology students' beliefs about evolutionary theory and religion. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30 (2), 118-125.
Smith, M. U. (1994).Counterpoint: Belief, understanding, and the teaching of evolution.
Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 31 ,
591-597.
Smith, M. U., Siegel,H., ve McInerney, J.D. (1995). Foundational issues in evolution education. Science ve Education, 4, 23-46.
Soderberg, P. (2003). An examination of problem-based teaching and learning in population genetics and evolution using evolve, a computer simulation. International Journal of Science Education, 25 (1), 35-55.
Southerland, S. A., Sinatra, G. M. ve Matthews, M. (2001). Belief, knowledge, and science education. Educational Psychology Review, 13,
325-351.
Staub, N. (2002). Teaching evolutionary mechanisms: Genetic drift and mvem's. Bioscience, 52(4), 373-377.
Takhtajan, A. (1969). Flowering plants origin and dispersal. Edinburg: Oliver and Boyd LTD.
Wood-Robinsson, C. (1994). Young people's ideas about inheritance and evolution. Studies in Science Education, 24, 29-47.
Woods, C., S. ve Scharmann, L., C. (2001). High school students' perceptions of evolutionary theory. Electronic Journal of ScienceEducation,6(2).(http://unr.edu/homepage /crowther/ej se/woodsetal.html' den 18.01.2006 tarihinde indirilmiştir.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com