Buradasınız

MEDYA OKURYAZARLIĞI EĞİTİMİ ALAN REHBERLİK VE PSİKOLOJİK DANIŞMANLIK ANABİLİM DALI ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN AKTİF VATANDAŞLIK DÜZEYLERİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER

THE FACTORS THAT AFFECT ACTIVE CITIZENSHIP LEVELS OF THE STUDENTS THAT ATTENDED MEDIA LITERACY COURSE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF GUIDANCE AND PSYCHOLOGICAL COUNSELLING

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
In the beginning of the 21st century, the concept of citizenship that was approached in the context of rights and responsibility evolves towards the active citizenship that highlighting the responsibilities of individuals in society. Furthermore, in the parallel with rapid development of the information and communication technologies, media addiction and negative effects of media had been emerged as a result of this phenomenon. The media literacy approach provides critical and conscious consumption of media and gives opportunities to individuals’ create their own media messages. The ultimate purpose of media literacy, that gives autonomy and empowers individuals, is defined as active citizenship. Active citizenship and media literacy are interrelated concepts. The aims of study is to examine the factors that affect active citizenship levels of the students that attended media literacy course in the department of Guidance and Psychological Counselling and make theoretical propositions. Qualitative method and grounded theory have been used in the study. Purposive and theoretical sampling technique has been used. Guidance and Psychological Counselling third grade students’ were selected participant. For the data collection method, individual interviews were used. According to results of study, the social and individual participations of university students are affected by readiness of cognitive and affective levels, social competence, personal opportunities, environment and benefit factors.
Abstract (Original Language): 
XXI. yüzyılın başlarında haklar ve sorumluluklar bağlamında ele alınan vatandaşlık kavramı, bireylerin toplumdaki sorumluluklarını ön plana çıkaran aktif vatandaşlık yaklaşımına doğru evrilmektedir. Bunun yanında, bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerindeki hızla gelişime paralel olarak ortaya çıkan medya bağımlılığı ve medyanın olumsuz etkilerine karşı, medya okuryazarlığı yaklaşımı medya tüketiminde eleştirel ve bilinçli olmayı sağlamakta, bireylerin kendi medya mesajlarını yaratmalarında fırsatlar sunmaktadır. Bireyleri medya karşısında donanımlı olmalarını sağlayarak yetkilendiren medya okuryazarlığının nihai amacı aktif vatandaşlık olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Dolayısıyla, medya okuryazarlığı ve aktif vatandaşlık birbiriyle ilişkili iki kavram olarak öne çıkmaktadırlar. Çalışmada medya okuryazarlığı eğitimi almış Rehberlik ve Psikolojik Danışmanlık Anabilim Dalı öğrencilerinin aktif vatandaşlık düzeylerini (sosyal ve bireysel katılım) etkileyen faktörleri belirleyerek, teorik önermelerde bulunmak amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırma nitel araştırma yönteminde ve gömülü teori desenindedir. Amaçlı ve teorik örnekleme tekniği ile Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi’nde “Medya Okuryazarlığı” dersi alan Rehberlik ve Psikolojik Danışmanlık Anabilim Dalı 3. sınıf öğrencileri çalışma grubu olarak seçilmiştir. Veri toplama tekniği olarak, gömülü teori deseninin temel veri toplama kaynağı olan bireysel görüşmelerden faydalanılmaktadır. Çalışmada, üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal ve bireysel katılım davranışlarının bilişsel ve duyuşsal hazıroluş düzeyi, sosyal yeterlilik, kişisel imkânlar, çevre ve fayda faktörlerinden etkilendiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.
169
191

REFERENCES

References: 

Akinboye, O. A., Ayanwuyi, E., Kuponiyi, F. A. ve Oyetoro, J. (2007). Factors affecting
youth participation in community development in Remo North Government Area
of Ogun State , The Social Sciences 2 (3): 307-311.
Asthana, S. 2006. Innovative practices of youth participation in media. Paris: United
Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
Aufderheide, P. (1993) Media literacy. A Report of the National Leadership Conference on
Media Literacy. Queenstown, MD, Aspen Institute.
Backman, K. ve Kyngas, H. A. (1999). Challenges of the grounded theory approach to a
novice researcher. Nursing and Health Sciences, 1. 147-153.
Barber, B. (2003). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. California Pres,
University of California.
Brodie, E., Cowling, E. Nissen, N., Paine, A.E., Jochum, V. ve Warburton, D. (2009).
Pathways through participation. Understanding participation: A literature review.
http://www.sp.gov.tr/documents/Pathways-literature-review-final-version.pdf
Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture,
Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
Buckingham, D. (2009). The future of media literacy in the digital age: some challenges for
policy and practice. Medienimpulse. http://medienimpulse.at/articles/view/143
Carlsson, U., Tayie, S., Jacquinot-Delaunay G., & Manuet Perez Tornero, J. (2008).
Empowerment through media education: An intercultural dialogue. NORDICOM
and International Clearinghouse on Children, Youth and Media. Goteborg,
Sweden.
Checkoway, B. (2011). What is youth participation? Children and Youth Services Review
33, 340–345
Cicognani, E., Zani, B., Fournier, B., Gavray, C. ve Born, M. (2012). Gender differences in
youths’ political engagement and participation. The role of parents and of
adolescents’ social and civic participation. Journal of Adolescence 35, 561–576
Compaine, B. M. (2001). The digital divide: Facing a crisis or creating a myth? London:
MIT Press.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five
traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
188
Culver, S. H. ve Jacobson, T. (2012). Media literacy and its use as a method to encourage
civic engagement, Comunicar.
Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego,
CA: Academic Press.
Doherty, B., Plows, A. and Wall, D. (2003) The preferred way of doing things: The British
direct action movement, Parliamentary Affairs 56(4): 669-686.
Domine, V. (2011). The coming of age media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy
Education 3:1, 8-10
European Commission (2007). Current trends and approaches to media literacy in Europe.
http://ec.europa.eu/culture/media/literacy/studies/index_en. htm
European Commission (1998). Education and active citizenship in the European Union
Office for official publications of the European Communities.
European Commission (2009). Commission recommendation on media literacy in the
digital environment for a more competitive audiovisual and content industry and
an Inclusive Knowledge Society, 6464 Final, Brussels.
European Council (2000). Presidency conclusions. Lisbon European Council 23 and 24
March 2000, Brussels, European Council.
European Council(2008). Council conclusions on European approach to media literacy in
the digital environment, 2868th Education, Youth and Culture Council Meeting,
Brussels.
Fedorov, A. (2012). The Contemporary mass media education in Russia: In search for new
theoretical conceptions and models, Acta Didactica Napocensia, 5-1
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory.
Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for
qualitative research. Chicago:Aldine.
Ginsborg, P. (2005) The politics of everyday life: Making choices, changing lives, New
York: Yale University Press.
Goulding, C. (1999). Grounded theory: Some reflections on paradigm, procedures and
misconceptions. Working Paper Series WP006/99,University of Wolverhampton.
Hoskins, B. L. Ve Mascherini, M. (2009). Measuring active citizenship through the
development of a composite indicator, 90, Social Indicator Research, 459-488
189
Humphreys, M., J. (2011). A new generation of leaders for Eastern Europe: values and
attitudes for active citizenship, Christian Higher Education, 10:3-4, 215-236.
Jerome., L. (2003).The citizenship co-ordinators' handbook. Nelson Thornes Ltd, 78-79,
Jochum, V., Pratten, B. ve Wilding, K. (2005). Civil renewal and active citizenship: a guide
to the debate www.ncvovol.org.uk/asp/uploads/
uploadedfiles/1/637/civilrenewalactivecitizenship.pdf
Kerr, D. (2005). Promoting active citizenship in schools and communities in England:
Emerging lessons from policy, practice and research. Unpublished report.
Kıncal, R. Y. ve Kartal, O. Y. (2008). High school students’ perceptions on television
serials, IV International Scientific Conference-Contemporary Intentions in
Education, 13-15 Haziran 2008, Macedonia.
Kıncal, R. Y. ve Kartal, O. Y. (2009).. Medya okuryazarlığı eğitimi, Milli Eğitim Eğitim ve
Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, sayı 181.
Kıncal, R.Y. ve Yazgan, A. D. (2010).Media literacy levels of Turkish high school students
and their tendencies to media violence: A descriptive study, World Conference on
Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (ED-MEDIA 2010)
(June 29-July 2, 2010), Proceedings Book, pp. 2428-2437. Chesapeake, VA:
AACE,Toronto, Canada.
Linden, A. and Klandermans, B. (2007) Revolutionaries, wanderers, converts, and
complaints – Life histories of extreme right activists, Journal of Contemporary
Ethnography, 36(2): 184-201
Livingstone, Sonia (2004) What is media literacy? Intermedia, 32 (3). pp. 18-20.
McLean, S. ve Andersson, E. (2009). Activating Empowerment, London: Ipsos MORI.
McLean, S. ve Dellot, B. (2011). The Civic Pulse. Measuring Active Citizenship in a Cold
Climate. RSA Projects. http://www.thersa.org/
data/assets/pdf_file/0018/408006/RSA-Civic-pulse_2011.pdf
Melucci, A. (1996) Challenging Codes: Collective action in the information age,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mihailidis, P. (2011). New civic voices & the emerging media literacy landscape, Journal
of Media Literacy Education 3:1, 4 - 5
Miles, M. B. ve Huberman A.M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis : An Expanded
Sourcebook. (2nd Edition). Calif. : Sage Publications.
190
Mills, J.; Bonner, A. ve Francis, K. (2006). The development of constructivist grounded
theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (1) March.
Morse, J. (2001). Situating grounded theory within qualitative inquiry. In R. Schreiber & P.
N. Stern (Eds.), Using grounded theory in nursing (pp. 1-16). New York:
Springer.
Mutz, D. (2006). Hearing the other side deliberative versus participatory democracy.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Myers, M. D. (1997). Qualitative research in information systems. Management
Information Systems Quarterly 21, 241S242. Updated version available online at
www.qual.auckland.ac.nz. [Retrieved October 3, 2003.]
National Association for Media Literacy Education (NAMLE). 2007. Key questions to ask
when analyzing media messages. http://namle.net/wpcontent/
uploads/2009/09/NAMLEKeyQuestions0708.pdf
NCVO, Involve and IVR (2009), Briefing paper no.1 – What is participation? Towards a
round-earth view of participation. London.
Oldfield, Adrian (2008). Vatandaşlık: Doğal olmayan bir pratik mi?, Ayşe Kadıoğlu(Der.),
Vatandaşlığın Dönüşümü: Üyelikten Haklara, İstanbul: Metis Yayınları, 93‐106
Oxstrand, B.(2009). Media literacy education; A discussion on about media education in
the Western Countries, Europe and Sweden, Nordmedia09 Conferrrence in
Karlsdtad University, Sweden.
Pattie, C. J., Seyd, P. and Whiteley, P. (2004). Citizenship in Britain: Values, participation
and democracy, Cambridge University Press.
Rivotella, P., C. (2009). Media Literacy in Europe: Controversies, challenges and
perspectives, Euromeduc.
Schudson, M., (1999). Good citizens and bad history: Today's political ideals in historical
perspective. Paper presented at conference on "The Transformation of Civic Life"
Middle Tennessee State University. Nov. 12-
13.www.ncvovol.org.uk/asp/uploads/uploadedfiles/1 /637/civilrenew
alactivecitizen ship.pdf
Skidmore, P., Bound, K. ve Lownsbrough, H. (2006). Community participation: Who
benefits? Joseph Rowntree Foundation
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures
for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
191
Taylor, C. (2006). Yanlış Anlaşmalar: Cemaatçi‐Liberal Tartışması, Çev. Çağa Tanyar,
Der. Andre BERTEN‐Pablo DA SİLVEİRA‐Herve POURTOİS, Liberaller ve
Cemaatçiler, Ankara: Dost Yayınları, 77‐104
Thevenin, B.(2012). Voices from the field, the Re-Politicization of Media Literacy
Education, (mentored by Paul Mihailidis), Journal of Media Literacy Education
4:1, 61 – 69.
Tulodziecki, G. ve Grafe, S. (2012). Approaches to learning with media and media literacy
education – trends and current situation in Germany, Journal of Media Literacy
Education 4:1, 44 – 60
UNESCO, (2008). Communication and information: Towards a prospective research
agenda. Report on a Worskhop, UNESCO, Paris, 20–21 November, 2007.
http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/files/27494/12205400 733iamcr_
report.pdf/iamcr_report.pdf
Uslaner, E. M. Civic engagement in America: Why people participate in political and social
life, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
http://www.bsos.umd.edu/gvpt/uslaner/democracycollaborative.pdf
Van Dijk, J. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4-
5), 221-235.
Vanwynsberghe, H.; Boundry, E. ve Verdegem, P. (2011). Mapping social media literacy.
Towards a conceptual framwork. EMSOC-User Empowerment in a Social Media
Culture.http://emsoc.be/wp-content/uploads/2012/01 /emsoc-WP2-MICTdeliverable1_
14.pdf
Verbıers, P. (2009). Media Literacy in Europe: Controversies, Challenges and Perspectives,
Euromeduc.
Vickery, G., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2007). Participative web and user-generated content:
web 2.0, wikis and social networking. Paris.
Walker, D., & Myrick, F. (2006). Grounded theory: An exploration of process and
procedure. Qualitative Health Research, 16(4), 547-559.
Zacchetti, M. (2007). Media literacy: A European approach. Medienimpulse, number 61.
http://web.worldbank.org
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/pdf/PCE_Report_508_FINAL.pdf.
Principle of Community Engagement, Second Edition. 2011

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com