Buradasınız

Impact of Subject Matter Knowledge of a Teacher in Teaching and Learning Process

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Teaching involves the imparting of knowledge, skills and attitudes to an individual. The inclusion of subject matter knowledge of teacher in teaching and learning process has many dimensions. In this paper, whether the subject matter knowledge of teachers has impact on teaching and learning or not was examined, and found in literature and surveys that the subject matter knowledge of a teacher impacts on teaching and learning process in schools. Although it appears self evident that teachers must know what they are teaching, agreement does not exist in the idea of knowing subject matter for teaching. In this paper, the writer wants to offer a framework for renewing interest in the subject and also to encourage further research that can significantly reveal the degree of the impact of subject matter knowledge on teaching and learning. The methodology was a survey based on literature reviews of research reports on this topic. The paper concluded that understanding of subject matter by a teacher implies that teachers are able to teach the main points of the subject matter to students, and to clarify misconceptions of knowledge depends to some extent on the teachers understanding of the subject matter through which impact is made on learning when students are able to use the subject matter taught in class to actively participate in their environment.
20
29

REFERENCES

References: 

Ball, D. L. (1988). Knowledge and reasoning in mathematical pedagogy: Examining what prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing
Ball, D.L (1991). Research on teaching Mathematics: making subject matter knowledge part of the equation. In J.Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching Vol.2. Teachers’ subject matter knowledge and classroom instruction. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Begle E.G and Geeslin W. (1972). Teacher effectiveness in Mathematics instruction (National Longitudinal Study of Mathematical Abilities Reports: No. 28). Wishington DC: Mathematical Association of America and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Boe, E.E., Bobbitt , S.A. , Cook, L.H, Whitener, S.D., & Weber, A. L. (1997). Why didst thou go? Predictors of retention, transfer, and attrition of special and general education teachers from a national perspective. The Journal of Special Education, 30 (4), 390–411.
Buchman, M. (1984). The priority of knowledge and understanding in teaching. In J. Raths and L. Katz (Eds). Advances in teaching education (vol.1, pp. 29-48). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Conant, J (1963). The Education of American Teachers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cusick, (1983). The egalitarian ideal and the American High School: Studies of three schools- New York: Longman.
Darling-Hammond, L. Powerful Teacher Education: Lessons from Exemplary Programs.
(2006). San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 21.
Darling-Hammond, L. Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence. (2000). Education Policy Analysis Archives. 8(1). 31.
Feiman-Nemser,S (1983). Learning to teach. In L. Shulman and G. Sykes (Ed.); Handbook of teaching and policy (pp.150-170). New York: Longman.
Goldhaber, D. Everyone’s Doing It, But What Does Teacher Testing Tell Us About Teacher Effectiveness? http://www.crpe.org. Center on Reinventing Public Education. Paper presented at the AERA annual meeting April 4, 2006, 31. (pdf article on crpe.org website. Search by author or title on website).
Grossman, P.L (1989). Subject matter knowledge and the teaching of English. In J.Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching Vol.2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, Issue 7
Year 2014
29
Hashweh, M (1987). Effects of subject matter knowledge in the teaching of Biology and Physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 109-120.
Ingersoll., R. (2003). Original analysis for NCTAF of the 2000–01 Teacher Followup Survey. In No Dream Denied, National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. 84. www.nctaf.org.
Leinhardt, G, and Smith, D (1985). Expertise in Mathematics instruction: subject matter knowledge Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 247-271.
Lampert, M (1986). Knowing, doing and teaching Multiplication Cognition and Instruction, 3, 305-342.
Lampert, M. (1989). Choosing and using Mathematical tools in classroom discourse. In J. Schefflers’ (1973). Research on Teachers education: New York: Macmillan.
Ofsted 2012: Teacher subject knowledge. FGTO, March 7, 2013 Available at: www.fromgoodtooutstanding.com/2013/03/ofsted-2012-teacher-subject-knowledge
Peters, R. S. (1977). Education and the education of teachers. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
Shen, J. (2003). New teachers’ certification status and attrition pattern. A survival analysis using the Baccalaureate and Beyond Longitudinal Study 1993–97. Paper presented at the AERA annual meeting, Chicago.
Shroyer (1981). Teachers and teaching. New York: Macmillan.
Wilson and Wineburg (1988). Learning to Teach: New York: Macmillan.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com