Buradasınız

THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF TURKISH VERSION OF THE REVISED RELIGIOUS FUNDEMENTALISM SCALE

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this study is to examine validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Revised Religious Fundementalism Scale (Altemeyer & Hunsberger, 2004). The sample of this study consisted of 360 undergraduate students. The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that Revised Religious Fundementalism Scale model was well fit (x²= 123.24, df= 40, RMSEA= .075, GFI= .95, CFI= .90, RFI= .78, IFI= .91, and SRMR= .075). The internal consistency reliability coefficient of the scale was .62.
54
56

REFERENCES

References: 

Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (2004). A revised Religious Fundamentalism Scale: The short and sweet of it.
The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14(1), 47-54.
Barzilai-Nahon K., & Barzilai, G. (2005). Cultured Technology: The Internet and religious fundamentalism. The
Information Society, 21, 25–40.
Carlucci, L., Tommasi, M., & Saggino, A. (2013). Factor Structure of the Italian Version of the Religious
Fundamentalism Scale. Psychological Reports, 112(1), 6-13.
Duschinsky, R. (2012). Fundamentalism and the changing religious field. Social Compass, 59(1), 21–33.
Moaddel, M., & Karbenick, S.A. (2008). Religious fundamentalism among young muslims in Egypt and Saudi
Arabia. Social Forces, 86(4), 1675-1710.
Ozzano, L. (2009). A political science perspective on religious fundamentalism. Totalitarian Movements and
Political Religions, 10, 339–359.
Plante, T. G., & Boccaccini, M. T. (1997). The Santa Clara Strength of religious faith Questionnaire. Pastoral
Psychology, 45, 375–387.
Schaafsma, J., & Williams, K. D. (2012). Exclusion, inter group hostility, and religious fundamentalism. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 829-837.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com