Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Forearm Bone fractures: Dynamic Compression Platting Vs Locking compression plating – Randomised control study.

Journal Name:

  • Indian Journal of Basic & Applied Medical Research

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
BACKGROUND: This article reports the efficacy of Dynamic compression plate versus Locking compression plate with regards to forearm bone fracture fixation, implant fixation, intra-operative & post-operative complications of the surgical intervention. SUBJECTS & METODS: 40 patients with a history of traumatic fracture of forearm bone were included in the study who reported in our Hospital. RESULTS: In a study of 40 cases of forearm bone fractures, 20 (Group A) were treated with DCP and 20 ( Group B) were treated with Locking compression plate.All the 40 patients were followed up at 4-6 weeks , 11-14 weeks and 6 months for functional and radiological review. CONCLUSION: The locking compression plating of diaphyseal bones produced excellent results, the advantages being early mobilization, early union and hence prevention of fracture disease. The only disadvantage is that it is more expensive than the Dynamic compression plate.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-forearm-bone-fractures-dynamic-compression-platting-vs-locking-compression-plating-randomised-control-study.pdf
  • 3
226
232
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Rockwood & Green’s Fractures in Adults. 6th ed. Buchloz,Robert W. 1:967
2. Anderson LD, Sisk TD, Tooms RE and Park WI. Compression plate fixation in acute diaphyseal
fractures of the radius and ulna. J Bone Joint Surg 1975;57A:287-297.
3. Muller ME, Allogower M, Schneider R and Willenegger H. Manual of internal fixation techniques
recommended by AO group. 3rd ed. New York: Springer–Verlag Berlin; 1990.
4. Patrick J. A study of supination and pronation with special reference to the treatment of forearm
fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 1946 Oct; 28:737-748.
5. Goyal S, Iraqi AA, Sadiq SA and Vadhva M. Implant of choice for diaphyseal fractures of forearm,
practical suggestions and review of literature. Ind J Orthop1997 May; 31(1):26-32.
6. Charnley J. The closed treatment of common fractures. 3rd ed. Edinburgh, Churchill Living Stone;
1961.
7. Watson-Jones. Fracture and Joint injuries. 6thed. Churchill Livingstone; 1982.
231
Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research; June 2014: Vol.-3, Issue- 3, P. 226-232
227
www.ijbamr.com P ISSN: 2250-284X , E ISSN : 2250-2858
8. Anderson LD, Sisk TD, Tooms RE and Park WI. Compression plate fixation in acute diaphyseal
fractures of the radius and ulna. J Bone Joint Surg 1975;57A:287-297.
9. Burwell HN and Charnley AD. Treatment of forearm fractures in adults with particular reference to
plate fixation. J Bone Joint Surg 1964; 25B:404.
10. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics. 11th ed. Canale ST. 3:3044–3045.
11. Muller ME, Allogower M, Schneider R and Willenegger H. Manual of internal fixation. 3rd ed. 1995;
218-222.
12. Schenk RK and Willenegger HR. Histology of primary bone healing: modifications and limits of
recovery of gaps in relation to extent of the defect (author’s transl). Unfallbeilkunde 1977; 80(5): 155-
60.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com