1. Dağdeviren, M., ve Eren, T., “Analytical
Hierarchy Process and Use of 0-1 Goal
Programming Methods in Selecting Supplier
Firm”, J. Fac. Eng. Arch. Gazi Univ.,16 , 2, 41-
52, 2001.
2. Kralawski, A., Pedrycz W., ve Nyström L.,
“Fuzzy Neural Network as Instance Generator for
Case-Based Reasoning System: An Example of
Selection of Heat Exchange Equipment in Mixing
Tanks”, Neural Computing & Applications, 8,
106–113, 1999.
3. Kulak, O., Durmuşoglu, M. B., ve Kahraman, C.,
“Fuzzy multiattribute equipment selection based
on information axiom”, Journal of Materials
Processing Technology, 169, 337–345, 2005.
4. Dağdeviren, M., “Decision making in equipment
selection: an ıntegrated approach with AHP and
PROMETHEE”, Journal of Intelligent
Manufacturing, 19, 397-406, 2008.
5. Ayağ, Z., ve Özdemir, R. G., “A fuzzy AHP
approach to evaluating machine tool
alternatives”, Journal of Intelligent
Manufacturing, 17, 179–190, 2006.
6. Başçetin, A., ve Kesimal, A., “A new approach in
selection of loading-hauling systems in surface
mining”, 16th Mining Congress of Turkey,
ISBN 975-395-310-0, 1999.
7. Başçetin, A., “A decision support system for
optimal equipment selection in open pit mining:
Analytical Hierarchy Process”, İstanbul Üniv.
Müh. Fak. Yerbilimleri Dergisi, 16, 2, 1-11,
2003.
8. Chan, F. T. S., Ip, R. W. L., ve Lau, H.,
“Integration of expert system with analytic
hierarchy process for the design of material
handling equipment selection system”, Journal
of Materials Processing Technology, 116, 137–
145, 2001.
9. Manassero, G., Semeraro Q., ve Tolio T., “A new
method to cope with decision makers' uncertainty
in the equipment selection process”, CIRP
Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 53, 1,
389-392, 2004.
10. Chakraborty, S., ve Banik, D., “Design of a
material handling equipment selection model
using Analytical Hierarchy Process”,
B. Yılmaz ve M. Dağdeviren Ekipman Seçimi Probleminde Promethee ve Bulanık Promethee Yöntemlerinin…
824 Gazi Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Der. Cilt 25, No 4, 2010
International Journal of Advanced
Manufacturing Technologies, 28, 1237-1245,
2006.
11. İç, Y. T., ve Yurdakul, M., “Decision support
system for selection of machining centers”, J.
Fac. Eng. Arch. Gazi Univ, 23, 1, 85-95, 2008.
12. Decision Lab, 1.01.0388, copyright © 1998-2000,
Visual Decision Inc., Canada.
<http://www.visualdecision.com>.
13. Saaty, T., The Analytic Hierarchy Process,
McGraw- Hill International Book Company,
USA,1980.
14. Schniederjans, M. J., ve Wilson, R.L., “Using the
Analytic Hierarchy Process and Goal
Programming- for Information System Project
Selection”, Information & Management, 20, 5,
333-342, 1991.
15. Suresh, N.C., ve Kaparthi, S., “Flexible
AutomationInvestments: A Synthesis of Two
Multi-Objective Modeling Approaches”,
Computers & Industrial Engineering, 22, 3,
257-272, 1992.
16. Ehie, I.C., ve Benjamin, C.O., “An Integrated
Multiobjective Planning Model: A Case Study Of
The Zambian Copper Mining Industry”,
European J. of Operational Research, 68, 2,
160-172, 1993.
17. Myint, S., ve Tabucanon, M.T., “A Multiple-
Criteria Approach to Machine Selection for
Flexible Manufacturing Systems”, International
Journal of Production Economics, 33, 1-3, 121-
131, 1994.
18. Ramanathan, R., ve Ganesh, L. S., “Energy
Alternatives for Lighting in Households: An
Evaluation Using An Integrated Goal
Programming-AHP Model”, Energy, 20, 1, 63-
72, 1995.
19. Ramanathan, R. ve Ganesh, L. S., “Energy
Resource Allocation Incorporating Qualitative
and Quantitative Criteria: An Integrated Model
Using Goal Programming And AHP”, Socio-
Economic Planning Sciences, 29, 3, 197-218,
1995.
20. Schniederjans, M.J., ve Garvin, T., “Using the
Analytic Hierarchy Process and Multi-Objective
Programming for the Selection of Cost Drivers in
Activity-Based Costing”, European Journal of
Operational Research, 100, 1, 72-80, 1997.
21. Badri, M. A., “Combining the Analytic Hierarchy
Process and Goal Programming for Global
Facility Location-Allocation Problem”,
International J. of Production Economics, 62,
3, 237-248, 1999.
22. Badri, M. A., “A Combined AHP–GP Model for
Quality Control Systems”, International
Journal of Production Economics, 72, 1, 27-40,
2001.
23. Bowen, W.M., “Subjective Judgements and Data
Envelopment Analysis in Site Selection”,
Computers, Environment and Urban Systems,
14, 2, 133-144, 1990.
24. Shang, J., ve Sueyoshi, T., “A Unified
Framework for the Selection of a Flexible
Manufacturing System”, European Journal of
Operational Research, 85, 2, 297-315, 1995.
25. Sinuany-Stern, Z., Mehrez, A. ve Hadad, Y., “An
AHP/DEA Methodology for Ranking Decision
Making Units”, International Transactions in
Operational Research, 7, 2, 109-124, 2000.
26. Yang, T., ve Kuo, C., “A Hierarchical AHP/DEA
Methodology for the Facilities Layout Design
Problem”, European Journal of Operational
Research, 147, 1, 128-136, 2003.
27. Mon, D., Cheng, C. ve Lin, J., “Evaluating
Weapon System Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy
Process Based on Entropy Weight”, Fuzzy Sets
and Systems, 62, 2, 127-134, 1994.
28. Chang, D., “Applications of the Extent Analysis
Method on Fuzzy AHP”, European Journal of
Operational Research, 95, 3, 649-655, 1996.
29. Weck, M., Klocke, F., Schell, H., ve Rüenauver,
E., “Evaluating Alternative Production Cycles
Using the Extended Fuzzy AHP Method”,
European Journal of perational Research, 100,
2, 351- 366, 1997.
30. Zhu, K., Jing, Y., ve Chang, D., “A Discussion
on Extent Analysis Method and Applications of
Fuzzy AHP”, European Journal of Operational
Research, 116, 2, 450-456, 1999.
31. Kuo, R. J., Chi, S. C. ve Kao, S. S., “A Decision
Support System for Locating Convenience Store
Through Fuzzy AHP”, Computers & Industrial
Engineering, 37, 1-2, 323-326, 1999.
32. Leung, L. C. ve Cao, D., “On Consistency and
Ranking of Alternatives in Fuzzy AHP”,
European Journal of Operational Research,
124, 1, 102- 113, 2000.
33. Yu, C.S., “A GP-AHP Method for Solving Group
Decision-Making Fuzzy AHP Problems”,
Computers & Operations Research, 29, 14,
1969-2001, 2002.
34. Bozdağ, C.E., Kahraman, C. ve Ruan, D., “Fuzzy
Group Decision Making for Selection Among
Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems”,
Computers in Industry, 51, 1, 13-29, 2003.
35. Kahraman, C., Ruan, D. ve Doğan, I., “Fuzzy
Group Decision-Making for Facility Location
Selection”, Information Sciences, 157, 135-153,
2003.
36. Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U. ve Ruan, D., “Multi-
Attribute Comparison of Catering Service
Companies Using Fuzzy AHP: The Case of
Turkey”, Int. Journal Production Economics,
87, 171-184, 2004.
37. Büyüközkan, G., Ertay, T., Kahraman, C. Ve
Ruan, D., “Determining the Importance Weights
for the Design Requirements in the House of
Quality Using the Fuzzy Analytic Network
Ekipman Seçimi Probleminde Promethee ve Bulanık Promethee Yöntemlerinin… B. Yılmaz ve M. Dağdeviren
Gazi Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Der. Cilt 25, No 4, 2010 825
Approach”, International Journal of Intelligent
Systems, 19, 443-461, 2004.
38. Kulak, O. ve Kahraman, C., “Fuzzy Multi-
Attribute Selection Among Transportation
Companies Using Axiomatic Design and
Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Information
Sciences, 170, 191-210, 2005.
39. Tolga, E., Demircan, M.L. ve Kahraman, C.,
“Operating System Selection Using Fuzzy
Replacement Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy
Process”, Int. J. of Production Economics, 97,
89-117, 2005.
40. Dağdeviren, M., Akay, D., Çetinyokus, T. ve
Kurt, M., “Bulanık Matematiksel Programlama
Teknigi İle Bir İş Değerlendirme Uygulaması”,
Teknoloji Z.K.Ü. Karabük Teknik Eğitim
Fakültesi Dergisi, 5, 1-2,91-96,2002.
41. Dağdeviren, M., Yüksel, İ., “Developing a Fuzzy
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model for
Behaviour Based Safety Management”,
Information Sciences, 178, 6, 1717-1733, 2008.
42. Saaty, T.,”The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic
Network Processes”, MCDM XV-th Int. Conf.,
Ankara, Turkey, 2000.
43. Tam, M.C.Y. ve Tummala, V.M.R., ”An
Application of the AHP in Vendor Selection of a
Telecommunications System” The Int. J. of
Management Science, 29, 2, 171-182, 2001.
44. Saaty, T., The Analytic Hierarchy Process for
Decision Making, Kobe, Japan, 1999.
45. Saaty, T., Fundamentals of Decision Making
and Priority Theory, RWS Publications,
Pittsburgh, USA, 2000.
46. Brans, J. P., ve Vincke, P. H., “A preference
ranking organization method”, Management
Science, 31, 647-656, 1985.
47. Brans, J. P., Vincke, P. H., ve Mareschall, B.,
“How to select and how to rank projects: The
PROMETHEE method”, European Journal of
Operational Research, 14, 228-238, 1986.
48. Goumas, M., ve Lygerou, V., “An extension of
the PROMETHEE method for decision making in
fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy
exploitation projects”, European Journal of
Operational Research, 123, 606-613, 2000.
49. Geldermann J., Spengler, T., ve Rentz, O.,
“Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment.
Case study: Iron and steel making industry”,
Fuzzy Set Systems, 115, 45– 65, 2000.
50. Le Téno, J., F., ve Mareschal, B., “An interval
version of PROMETHEE for the comparison of
building products’ design with ill-defined data on
environmental quality”, Eur Journal of
Operational Research, 109, 522–529, 1998.
51. Bilsel, R., U., Büyüközkan, G., ve Ruan, D., “A
fuzzy prefernce-ranking model for a quality
evaluation of hospital web sites”, International
Journal of Intelligent Systems, 21, 1181-1197,
2006.
52. Briggs, Th., Kunsch, P.L., ve Mareschal, B.,
“Nuclear waste management: An application of
the multicriteria PROMETHEE methods”,
European Journal of Operational Research,
44, 110, 1990.
53. Chou, W. C., Lin, W. T., ve Lin, C. Y.,
“Application of fuzzy theory and PROMETHEE
technique to evaluate suitable ecotechnology
method: A case study in Shihmen Reservoir
Watershed, Taiwan”, Ecological Engineering,
31, 269–280, 2007.
54. Queiruga, D., Walther, G., Gonza’lez-Benito, J.,
ve Spengler, T., “Evaluation of sites for
thelocation of WEEE recycling plants in Spain”,
Waste Management, 28, 1, 181–190, 2008.
55. D’Avignon, G., ve Mareschal, B., “An
application of the PROMETHEE and GAIA
methods”, Mathematical and Computer
Modelling, 12, (10–11), 1393–1400, 1989.
56. Du Bois, Ph., Brans, J.P., Cantraine, F., ve
Mareschal, B., “MEDICIS: An expert system for
computer-aided diagnosis using the
PROMETHEE multicriteria method”, European
Journal of Operational Research, 39, 284–292,
1989.
57. Olson, D.L., “Comparison of three multicriteria
methods to predict known outcomes”, European
Journal of Operational Research, 130, 3, 576–
587, 2001.
58. Rekiek, B., de Lit, P., ve Delchambre, A., “Hybrid
assembly line design and user’s preferences”,
International Journal of Production Research,
40, 5, 1095–1111, 2002.
59. Baourakis, G., Doumpos, M., Kalogeras, N., ve
Zopounidis, C., “Multicriteria analysis and
assessment of financial viability of
agribusinesses: The case of marketing cooperatives
and juice-producing companies”,
Agribusiness, 18, 4, 543–558, 2002.
60. Albadvi, A., Chaharsooghi, S.K., ve Esfahanipour,
A., “Decision making in stock trading: An
application of PROMETHEE”, European
Journal of Operational Research, 177, 673–683,
2007.
61. Hyde, K., Maier, H., ve Colby, C., “Incorporating
uncertainty in the PROMETHEE MCDA
method”, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision
Analysis, 12, 245–259, 2003.
62. Albadvi, A., “Formulating national information
technology strategies: A preference ranking
model using PROMETHEE method”, European
Journal of Operational Research, 153, 290–
296, 2004.
63. Johnson, M.P., “Spatial decision support for
assisted housing mobility counseling”, Decision
Support Systems, 41, 296–312, 2005.
64. Zhang, G., Ni, Y., Churchill, J., ve Kokot, S.,
“Authentication of vegetable oils on the basis of
their physico-chemical properties with the aid of
chemometrics”, Talanta, 70, 293–300, 2006.
B. Yılmaz ve M. Dağdeviren Ekipman Seçimi Probleminde Promethee ve Bulanık Promethee Yöntemlerinin…
826 Gazi Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Der. Cilt 25, No 4, 2010
65. Iniestra, J. G., ve Gutiérrez, J.G., “Multicriteria
decisions on interdependent infrastructure
transportation projects using an evolutionarybased
framework”, Applied Soft Computing, 9,
512–52, 2009.
66. Mohamadabadi, H., S., Tichkowsky, G., ve
Kumar, A., “Development of a multicriteria
assesment model for ranking of renewable and
non-renewable transportation fuel vehicles”,
Energy, 34, 112-125, 2009.
67. Brans, J. P., ve Mareschall, B., “The PROMCALC
& GAIA decision support system for multi-criteria
decision aid”, Decision Support Systems, 12,
297-310, 1994.
68. Ballı, S., Karasulu, B., ve Korukoğlu, S., “En
uygun otomobil seçimi problemi için bir bulanık
PROMETHEE yöntemi uygulaması”,
D.E.Ü.İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 22, 1, 139-147, 2007.
69. DuBois D., ve Prade H., “Operations on fuzzy
numbers”, Int J Syst Sci, 9, 613– 626, 1978.
70. Brans, J. P., ve Mareschal, B., “How to decide
with PROMETHEE”, Visual Decision Inc.,
Montreal, Canada,
http://www.visualdecision.com, 1998.
71. Wang, J. J., ve Yang, D. L., “Using a hybrid
multi-criteria decision aid method for information
systems outsourcing”, Computers & Operation
Research, 34, 3691-3700.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com
