Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

YAZILIM GELİŞTİRME PROJELERİNDE PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRMESİ

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF PROJECTS IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

Journal Name:

  • Havacılık ve Uzay Teknolojileri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2015

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
IT firms are able to develop various types of software development projects from small sized projects to very large ones. A software development process is carried out by different stages of the project management such as analysis, design, development and testing. At the end of the process, performance of the project is evaluated by project sponsor who represents the customer of the project. There are different factors that effect the performance of the projects like risk, project size, project type and priority, team size, budget, duration, change requests and delays. In this study, we aim to statistically analyze effects of these factors on performance evaluation of the project sponsor. Additionally, we try to develop a statistical model to aid the project sponsor in performance evaluation. We use real data from software development department of telecommunication firm.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
BT firmaları küçük boyutlulardan büyük boyutlulara kadar farklı yazılım geliştirme projelerini geliştirme konusunda çeşitli becerilere sahiptir. Bir yazılım geliştirme projesi analiz, geliştirme ve test gibi farklı proje yönetim katmanlarından oluşabilir. Projenin performansı aynı zamanda projenin müşterisi olarak da tabir edilen proje sponsoru tarafından sürecin sonunda belirlenir. Risk, proje boyutu, proje büyüklüğü ve önceliği, ekip büyüklüğü, bütçe, süre ve değişiklik istekleri gibi faktörler projenin performansını doğrudan etkileyebilir. Bu çalışmada, söz konusu faktörlerin proje sponsorunun performans değerlendirmesine olan etkileri istatistiksel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Bunun yanında makalede proje sponsorunun performans değerlendirmesini kolaylaştırmak amacıyla bir istatistiksel model de geliştirilmiştir. Çalışmada, bir telekomünikasyon firmasının yazılım geliştirme bölümünden alınan gerçek veriler kullanılmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-yazilim-gelistirme-projelerinde-performans-degerlendirmesi.pdf
  • 2
1
6
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Pmbok, 2013, A Guide to the Project
Management Body of Knowledge
(PMBOK® Guide)—Fifth Edition.
[2] Repiso, LR, Setchi, R., Salmeron, JL, 2007,
Modeling IT projects success: Emerging
methodologies reviewed. Technovation. 27, 10, 582-
594.
[3] Reyes F, Cerpa N, Candia-Vejar A, Bardeen
M, 2011, The optimization of success probability for
software projects using genetic algorithms, Journal of
System and Software, 84(5): 775-785.
[4] Standish Group, 2013 Choas manifesto 2013:
Think Big, act Small.
[5] Agarwal, N., Rathod, U., 2006. Defining
"success" for software projects: an exploratory
revelation. International Journal of Project
Management, 24, 358–370.
[6] Davis, K., 2014, Different stakeholder groups
and their perceptions of project success, International
Journal of Project Management, 32,189-201.
[7] Müller, R., Jugdev,K. ,2012, Critical success
factors in projects, International Journal of Managing
Projects in Business, Vol. 5 Iss 4 pp. 757 – 77.
[8] Atkinson, R., 1999, Project management: cost,
time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon,
its time to accept other success criteria, International
Journal of Project Management, 17, 337--342.
[9] Pinto, J.K., Slevin, D.P., 1988, Project success:
definitions and measurement techniques. Project
Management Journal, 19 (1), 67–73.
Performance Evaluation of Projects in Software Development
CETIN, ALABAS-USLU
6
[10] Lester, D.H., 1998, Critical success factors for
new product development, Research Technology
Management 41 (1), 36–43.
[11] Turner, J.R., 2004, Five conditions for project
success, International Journal of Project Management
22 (5), 349–350.
[12] Turner, J.R., Zolin, R., Remington, K., 2009,
“Modelling success on complex projects: multiple
perspectives over multiple time frames”, in:
Gemuenden, H.-G. (Ed.), The Proceedings of
IRNOP9, the 9th Conference of The International
Research Network of Organizing by Projects, Berlin,
June. Technical University of Berlin, Berlin.
[13] Turner, J.R., Zolin, R., 2012, Forecasting
success on large projects: developing reliable scales to
predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders
over multiple time frames, Project Management
Journal 43 (5), 87–99.
[14] Prabhakar, G.P., 2008, What is project success:
a literature review, International Journal of Business
and Management, Vol. 3 No. 9, pp. 3-10.
[15] Procaccinoa J.D., Verner J. M., 2006, Software
project managers and project success: An exploratory
study, The Journal of Systems and Software, 79,1541–
1551.
[16] Berssaneti F. T. & Carvalho M. M., 2014,
Identification of variables that impact project success
in Brazilian companies, International Journal of
Project Management.
[17] Dengiz, B., C. Alabas-Uslu and O. Dengiz,
2009, Optimization of manufacturing systems using a
neural network metamodel with a new training
approach, Journal of the Operational Research
Society, 60(9), 1191-1197, 2009.
[18] Dengiz, B., C. Alabas-Uslu. and O. Dengiz,
2009, A tabu search algorithm for the training of
neural networks, Journal of the Operational Research
Society, 60(2), 282-291, 2009.
[19] Stone, M., 1974, Cross-validatory choice and
assessment of statistical predictions, Journal of the
Royal Statistical Society Ser. B, 36, 111–147.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com