Buradasınız

EVALUATING OPTICAL NETWORKS’ BUSINESS MODEL

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Today’s business model comprises of several layers: End users, Internet Service Providers (ISP), exchange points, and carriers. Arbitrary technological upgrades and absence of interaction in this layered business model, have led to critical system shortcomings. Foremost issues caused by this model are: 1.) unoptimized topology, 2.) low-liquidity, 3.) waste of resources, 4.) reduced interoperability. We introduce a new and novel concept for coping with the issues and shortcomings of today’s business model. Integrated Neutral Topology Optimizer (INTO) is an over all arbiter layer with commercial functionality. This layer operates with ISPs and carriers during leasing process and continually monitors the traffic to optimize the bandwidth usage. Inter-and-intra carrier connections are made and maintained according to the decisions of this layer.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Günümüzde optik ağların iş modeli çeşitli katmanlardan oluşmaktadır: Son kullanıcılar, Servis Sağlayıcılar, Buluşma noktaları ve Taşıyıcılar. Bu katmanlar arasında işbirliğinin, uyumun çok alt seviyelerde olması ve herbirisinin kendi alanlarındaki teknolojik gelişmeleri diğer katmanları gözetmeden uygulamaları iş modelinde eksiklere ve hatalara sebep olmaktadır. Bugünkü modelin en başta gelen problemleri : 1) optimize edilmemiş topolojiler, 2) Düşük akıcılık, 3) Kaynak israfı, 4) Birlikte çalışma güçlüğü olarak sıralanabilir. Bu çalışmada bugünün iş modelinin eksik ve kusurları ile başedebilmek için yeni bir model sunulmuştur. Tümleşik Tarafsız Topoloji Eniyileştiriciler ağ katmanları arasında görev yapan ticari işlevi de bulunan yeni bir katmandır. Bu katman servis sağlayıcılar ve taşıyıcı kuruluşlar arasında, kullanılacak ağın kiralanmasından, üzerinde akan trafiğin görüntülenmesine ve topolojinin eniyileştirilmesine kadar görev yapar. Veri trafiğinin, hangi taşıyıcı kuruluşun hangi ağ parçası üzerinden gerçekleştirleceğine bu katman karar verir ve sürdürür.
43
51

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Gencata, A., Singhal N. and Mukherjee B,
Overview of Optical Communication Networks:
Current and Future Trends, University of
California, (2002).
[2] Mukherjee, B., R&D Priorities and Challenges
for Optical Networking: Migrating Theory to
Practice, preprint (2002).
[3] Gençata, A. and Mukherjee B., Virtual Topology
Adaptation for WDM Mesh Networks Under
Dynamic Traffic, IEEE/ACM Transactions on
networking, (2003) Vol. 11, No,2.
[4] Bhatia R., et al. Algorithmic Aspects of
Bandwidth Trading, Bell Labs. (2003).
[5] Level 3 Communications, Inc. www.level3.com
[6] Nortel Communications, http://www.nortel.com
[7] AT&T Communications, http://www.att.com
[8] Sprint Communications, http://www.sprint.com
[9] Lucent Communications,
http://www.lucent.com
[10] Band-x, www.band-x.com
[11] Arbinet, www.arbinet.com
[12] Telco Exchange, www.telcoexchange.com
[13] Bandwidth Market,
http://www.bandwidthmarket.com
[14] Aboulfadl M., Gupta A., Pradhan R.,
Kalyanaraman S., A Spot Prıcıng Framework To
Enable Prıcıng And Rısk Managementof Inter-
Domaın Assured Bandwıdth Servıces,
Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation
Conference (2002).
[15] Enron Co., www.enron.com.
[16] Cheliotis G., Bandwidth Trading in the Real
World: Findings and Implications for
Commodities Brokerage, Research Report, IBM
Research Zurich Research Laboratory
Switzerland, (2000).
[17] Chiu, Samuel, S. and Crametz, Jean-Pascal,
Taking Advantage of The Emerging Bandwidth
Exchange Market, White paper, RateXchange
Ltd. (1999).
[18] Chiu, Samuel, S. and Crametz, Jean-Pascal,
Arbitrage: surprising pricing relationship. Risk
Magazine, Bandwidth Special Report, (2000).
[19] Arte, Kai, Bandwidth Derivatives under
Network Arbitrage, Master of thesis, Helsinki
University of Technology, (2002).
[20] Young, S., Harman, N. and Harding, E., Trading
Telecoms as a Commodity, White paper, Ovum,
(2001).
[21] Kenyon C., Cheliotis G, Stochastic Models for
Telecom Commodity Prices, Computer
Networks 36, 533-555, (2001).
[22] Phone+Magazine
http://www.phoneplusmag.com/articles/1c1trade
3.htm
Evaluating Optical Networks’ Business Model
ÇUKURTEPE, ŞAHİN, KURNAZ
51
[23] Middle East Technical University,
http://modems.metu.edu.tr/annexpri1.html.
[24] Inter Exchange, www.interexchange.org.
[25] www.canaria.ca.
[26] Broker N., Hrishikesh S., Management
Challenges in the Optical Telecommunications
Industry, Research report, (2002).
[27] Keppo, J., Price of point-to-point bandwidth
contracts, University of Michigan, (2003).
[28] Gencata, A., Topology and bandwidth
adaptation in optical WDM backbone networks
with dynamic traffic, Ph.D. Thesis, Istanbul
Technical University, Turkey, (2003).
[29] Hu X.D., Jia X., Zhang Mu-H. and Shuai T.P.
Multicast Routing and Wavelength Assignment
in WDM Networks with Limited Drop-offs,
IEEE INFOCOM (2004).
[30] Ramaswami R. and Sivarajan K. N., Routing
and wavelength assignment in all-optical
networks , IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking,
(1995) vol. 3, pp. 489–500.
[31] Mokhtar A. and Azizoglu M., Adaptive
wavelength routing in all-optical networks,
IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 6, pp.
(1998) 197–206.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com