You are here

ITERATIVE CELLULAR IMAGE PROCESSING ALGORITHM

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
In this paper, a new iterative image processing algorithm is introduced and denoted as “iterative cellular image processing algorithm” (ICIPA). The new unsupervised iterative algorithm uses the advantage of stochastic properties and neighborhood relations between the cells of the input image. In ICIPA scheme; first regarding to the stochastic properties of the data, all possible quantization levels are determined and then 2D input image is processed using a function, based on averaging and neighborhood relationship, and after that a parameter C is assigned to each cell. Then Gaussian probability values are mapped to each cell regarding to all possible quantization levels and the attended value C. A maximum selector defines the highest probability value for each cell. In the case of complex data, first iteration output is fed into input till a sufficient output is found. We have applied ICIPA algorithm to various synthetic examples and then a real data, the ruins of Hittite Empire. Satisfactory results are obtained. We have observed that de-noising property of our scheme is the best in the literature. It is interesting that the corrupted data with Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) up to 97% ratio, can be de-noised by using our proposed ICIPA algorithm.
775-782

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Vaughan, C.J., “Ground-penetrating radar surveys used in archaeological investigations”, Geophysics, V. 51, No.3 P.595-604, 1986,
[2] Tsokas, G.N., Giannopoulos, A., Tsourlos, P., Vargemezis, G., Tealby, J.M., Sarris, A., Papazachos, C.B. and Savopoulou, T., “A large scale geophysical survey in the archeological site of Europos ( northern Greece)”, Applied Geophysics, 32, 85-98, 1994.
[3] Drahor, M., “Archeogeophysical Studies On The Halicarnassos Antiquities Site”, Geophysical Exploration of Archeological Sites, Theory and Practice of Applied Geophysics, Edited by Andreas Vogel, V.7, Vipweg Pub. Braunschweig/Wiesbuden, 1993.
[4] Sayın N., “Archeological sites-Evaluation of Menekşe (Tekirdağ) Region using geophysical approaches”, Istanbul Universty, Science Institutue, Ms. Sc Thesis, S.67, 1995.
[5] Akçığ, Z., Pınar, R., “Application of magnetic and SP for Bandırma-Kösemtuğ tomb”, Jeofizik Dergisi Vol. 9, Num. 1-2, 1995,
[6] Ercan, A., ve Temizsöz, İ., “10x10 M2 unit excation, archeological study of Hittite Empire Period”, Dönemi, Külhöyük, Ankara. Jeofizik Dergisi, Vol.12, Num. 1-2, 1998.
[7] Candansayar, M.E., Başokur, A.T. ve Peksen, E., “Detecting small-scale tergets by the two-sided gradient transformation”, Journal of the Balkan Geophysical Society. Vol. 2, No. 4, p.100-111, 1999.
[8] Ercan, A., “Archeological studies in Eğmir Helenistic (Leidya) period tumb”, Arkeojeofizik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Denizli,Türkiye” Jeofizik, Vol.13, Num.1-2, 1999.
[9] Bilgili, F., “Kombinierte Anwendung von Georadar, Geoelektrik und Geomagnetik zur Untersuchung eines Archaologischen Bauwerkes, Diplomarbeit”, Institut für Geowissenschaften der CAU Kiel, 2000.
[10] Fedi M, and Quata T, “Wavelet Analysis for the regional-residual and local seperstion at potential field anomalies”, Geophysical Prospecting, 46, 507-525, 1998.
[11] Uçan, O.N., Şeker, S., Albora, A.M. ve Özmen,A., “Separation of Magnetic Field Data Using 2-D Wavelet approach”, Journal of the Balkan Geophysical Society, 3, 53-58, 2000a.
[12] Uçan, O.N., Şeker, S., Albora, A.M., ve Özmen, A., “Seperation of Magnetic Field Data Using 2-D Wavelet”, Europen Geophysical Society XXV General Assembly, Nice-FRANCE, 25-29 April 2000b.
[13] Albora, A.M., Ucan, O.N., Ozmen, A., Ozkan, T., “Separation of Bouguer anamoly map using cellular neural network”, Journal of Applied Geophysical, V 46, 2, 129-142, 2001a.
[14] Albora, A.M., Özmen, A. and Uçan, O.N., “Resudal Separation of Magnetic Fields Using a Cellular Neural Network Approach”, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 158, 9-10, 1797-1818, 2001b.
[15] Chua L. and Yang, L., “Cellular Neural Networks: Theory”, IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems. 35, 1257-1272, 1998.
[16]. Stümpel, H., “Untersuchungen in Kusakli:Geophysikalische Prospektion”, Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient-Geselschaft, 128:85-93, Berlin, 1996.
[17] Stümpel, H., “Untersuchungen in Kusakli:Geophysikalische Prospektion”, Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient-Geselschaft, 129: 134-140, Berlin, 1997.
[18] Stümpel, H., “Untersuchungen in Kusakli:Geophysikalische Prospektion”, Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient-Geselschaft, 130: 144-153, Berlin, 1998.
[19] Karpe, M., “Die hethitische Stadtruine Kusakli-Sarissa 1997, alma mater philippina”, Marburger Universitatsbund, 1998: 21-26, 1998.
[20] Osman, O., Uçan O.N., ALBORA, M., “Evaluation of Hittite Archeological ruins using iterative Cellular image processing algorithm (ICIPA)” International Conference on Earth Science and Electronics ICESE’2002, pp.219-228, Turkey 2002.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com