You are here

Home » Content

Öz-Düzenleme Stratejileri ve Motivasyonel İnançlar İle Standart Olmayan Sözel Problem Çözme Arasındaki İlişkiler

THE CORRELATIONS BETWEEN SELF-REGULATED LEARNING STRATEGIES AND MOTIVATIONAL BELIEFS AND NON-STANDARD WORD PROBLEM SOLVING

Journal Name:

  • Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In that study it was aimed to investigate the predictive power of self-regulated learning strategies and motivational beliefs on pre-service mathematics teachers’ solutions of non-standard word problems. In the study the relation model was used and 127 pre-service teachers participated. 12 non-standard word problems were given to the participants and the “Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire” scale was ad- ministered to them.. According to results of the study it was concluded that self regulated learning strategies, self efficacy and task value predicted realistic solutions positively; self regulated learning strategies and task value predicted non-realistic solutions negatively. Furthermore, test anxiety predicted realistic solutions negatively and it predicted non-realistic solutions positively.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada ilköğretim matematik öğretmeni adaylarının öz-düzenleme stratejileri ve motivasyonel inançlarının standart olmayan sözel problemlere verdikleri yanıtları yordama gücü incelenmiştir. İlişkisel tarama modelinin kullanıldığı araştırmaya 127 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Öğretmen adaylarına 12 tane standart olmayan sözel problem sorulmuş ve “Güdülenme ve Öğrenme Stratejileri Ölçeği” uygulanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları öz-düzenleme stratejileri, öz-yeterlik ve görev değerinin gerçekçi yanıtların pozitif yönde; öz-düzenleme stratejileri ve görev değerinin gerçekçi olmayan yanıtların negatif yönde anlamlı yordayıcısı olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca araştırma sonuçları sınav kaygısının gerçekçi yanıtların negatif yönde; gerçekçi olmayan yanıtların ise pozitif yönde anlamlı yordayıcısı olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-oz-duzenleme-stratejileri-motivasyonel-inanclar-ile-standart-olmayan-sozel-problem-cozme-arasindaki-iliskiler.pdf
  • 1
167-180
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Alcı, B., Erden, M. ve Baykal, A. (2008). Üniversite öğrencilerinin matematik
başarıları ile algıladıkları problem çözme becerileri, özyeterlik algıları, bilişüstü
özdüzenleme stratejileri ve ÖSS sayısal puanları arasındaki açıklayıcı ve yordayıcı
ilişkiler örüntüsü. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 25 (2),53-68.
Azevedo, R., Ragan S., Cromley, J. G. & Pritchett, S. (2002, April). Do different
goal-setting conditions facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning of complex
science topics River Web?. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American
Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Demirel, F. ve Özkahveci, Ö. (2004). Güdülenme
ve öğrenme stratejileri ölçeği’nin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması.
Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 4(2), 207-239.
Crano, W.D. & Brewer, M.B. (2002). Principles and methods of social research.
New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C.L., Owen, R., &
Schroeter, K. (2003). Enhancing third-grade student’s mathematical problem solving
with self-regulated learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 306-
315.
Greer, B. (1993). The modelling perspective on world problems. Journal of
Mathematical Behavior, 12, 239-250.
Hofer, B. K., Yu, S. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Teaching college students to be
self-regulated learners. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated
learning from teaching to self- reflective practice (pp.57-85). London: Guilford Press.
Inoue, N. (2005). The realistic reasons behind unrealistic solutions: The role of
interpretive activity in word problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 15, 69-83.
Kılıç, Ç. (2011). İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmen Adaylarının Standart Olmayan
Sözel Problemlere Verdikleri Yanıtlar ve Yorumlar. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir
Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(3),55-74.
Kramarski, B. & Revach, T. (2009). The challenge of self-regulated learning in
mathematics teachers’ Professional training. Educational Studies in Mathematics.
72,379-399.
Kramarski, B., Weisse, I. & Minsker, I.K. (2010). How can self-regulated
learning support the problem solving of third-grade students with mathematics anxiety?.
ZDM Mathematics Education, 42,179-193.
Marcou, A. & Philippou, G. (2005). Motivational beliefs, self-regulated learning
and mathematical problem solving. In Chick H. L. ve Vincent, J.L. Proceedings of the
29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics
education, vol.3, (pp..297-304), Melbourne:PME.
Mayer, E. R. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of
problem solving, Instructional Science, 26, 49–63.
Olkun, S., Şahin, Ö., Akkurt, Z., Dikkartın, F.T. ve Gülbağcı, H. (2009). Modelleme
yoluyla problem çözme ve genelleme: İlköğretim öğrencileriyle bir çalışma. Eğitim
ve Bilim, 34(151), 65-73.
Öktem, S.,P. (2009). İlköğretim ikinci kademe öğrencilerinin gerçekçi cevap gerektiren
matematiksel sözel problemleri çözme becerileri. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans
Tezi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Perels, F., Gürtler, T. & Schmitz, B. (2005). Training of self-regulatory and
problem-solving competence. Learning and Instruction,15,123-139.
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining selfregulated
learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.
Pintrich, R. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In
M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, ve M. Zeidner (Eds), Handbook of self- regulation (pp,
451-501). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated
learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational
Pyschology, 82(1), 33-40.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A
mannual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ)
(Tec. Rep. No. 91-B-004). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, School of Education.
Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W.J. (1993). Reliability
and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ).
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53 (3), 801-814.
Rao, N., Moely, B. E. & Sachs, J. (2000). Motivational beliefs, study strategies,
and mathematics attainment in high and low achieving chinese secondary school
students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 287-316.
Reusser, K., & Stebler, R. (1997). Every word problem has a solution – The
social rationality of mathematical modeling in schools. Learning and Instruction, 7,
309-327.
Umay, A. ve Arıol, Ş. (2009). Matematik problemlerinin seçiminde kullanılabilecek
bazı gösterge önerileri. XVIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı.Ege Üniversitesi,
İzmir.
Üredi, I, ve Üredi, L. (2005). İlköğretim 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin öz-düzenleme
stratejileri ve motivasyonel inançlarının matematik başarısını yordama gücü. Mersin
Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 250-260.
VanZile-Tamsen, C. (2002). Assessing and promoting self- regulated strategy
use. Journal of College Counseling, 5(2), 182-188.
Verschaffel, L, De Corte,,E. & Borghart, I. (1997). Pre-service
teachers’conceptions and beliefs about the role of real-world knowledge in
mathematical modelling of school word problems. Learning and Instruction, 7(4), 339-
359.
Verschaffel, L., De Corte E. & Lasure, S. (1994). Realistic considerations in
mathematical modelling of school arithmetic word problems. Learning and Instruction,
4,273-294.
Yoshida, H., Verschaffel, L. & De Corte, E. (1997). Realistic considerations in
solving problematic word problems: Do Japanese and Belgian children have the same
difficulties? Learning and Instruction. 7 (4), 329-338.
Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectacy-value theory of achievement
motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
Wolters, C. A., Pintrich, P. R., & Karabenick, S. A. (2003, March). Assessing
academic self-regulated learning. Paper prepared for the Conference on Indicators of
Positive Development: Definitions, Measures, and Prospective Validity, Washington,
DC.
Yimer, A. & Ellerton, N. F. (2006). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of
mathematical problem solving: An Emerging Model, 575-582.
Zimmerman, B., J. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in selfregulated
learning: Relating grade, sex and giftedness to self- efficacy and strategy use.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51-59.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com