You are here

Home » Content

Görsel Okuryazarlık Eğitiminin Öğretmen Adaylarının Problem Çözme Yaklaşımlarına Etkisi: Gazi Üniversitesi Örneği

The Effect of Visual Literacy Education on the Problem Solving Approaches of Teacher Trainees

Journal Name:

  • Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study has been conducted in order to describe the effect of visual literacy education on the problem solving approaches of teacher trainees. 89 teacher trainees have participated in the study. Teacher trainees have received a total of 180 minutes visual literacy education in three weeks within the scope of the course of instructional technology and materials design. Problem Solving Inventory (PSI) has been implemented to teacher trainees in pre and post education periods. The qualitative data were collected through a semi-structured interview form and qualitative data were collected through PSI. Qualitative data were content-analyzed and quantitative data were analyzed with t-test. The results suggest that visual literacy education enhanced the self-confidence, visual awareness and visual communication skills of the students. According to problem solving inventory following the visual literacy education, there have been significant differences in the sub-dimensions of “reserved” and “self-confident”
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma görsel okuryazarlık eğitiminin öğretmen adaylarının problem çözme yaklaşımlarına etkisini betimlemek için yapılmıştır. Çalışmaya Okul Öncesi Eğitimi bölümündeki 89 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Öğretmen adaylarına öğretim teknolojisi ve materyal tasarımı dersi kapsamında üç haftada toplam 180 dakika görsel okuryazarlık eğitimi verilmiştir. Öğretmen adaylarına eğitim öncesi ve sonrası Problem Çözme Envanteri (PÇE) uygulanmıştır. Bu çalışmada nitel ve nicel yöntem birarada kullanılmıştır. Nitel veriler yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu ile, nicel veriler ise PÇE ile toplanmıştır. Nitel veriler içerik analizi ile, nicel veriler ise t testi ile çözümlenmiştir. Sonuçlara göre, görsel okuryazarlık eğitimi, öğretmen adaylarının özgüvenlerini, görsel farkındalıklarını, görsel iletişim becerilerini artırmıştır. Problem çözme envanterine göre de görsel okuryazarlık eğitimi sonrasında öğretmen adaylarının “kaçıngan”ve “kendine güvenli” alt boyutlarda anlamlı düzeyde farklılık gözlenmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-gorsel-okuryazarlik-egitiminin-ogretmen-adaylarinin-problem-cozme-yaklasimlarina-etkisi-gazi-universitesi-ornegi.pdf
  • 3
111
130
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Adair, J. (2000). Karar Verme ve Problem Çözme. N. Kalaycı (Çev.) Ankara: Gazi
Kitabevi. Ausburn, L.J.,& Ausburn, F.B. (1978). Visual literacy: Background, theory and practice. Programmed Learning & Educational Technology, 15(4), 291-297. Avgerinou, M.D. (2009). Re-viewing visual literacy in the “bain d’ images” era. TechTrends, 53(2), 28-34
Baron, R. A. (1996). Essential Of Psychology, A Child Psychology And Adjustment, Boston: Allyn And Bacon.
Bingham, A. (1998). Çocuklarda Problem Çözme Yeteneklerinin Geliştirilmesi, F. Oğuzkan (Çev.) İstanbul: MEB Yayınları.
Bleed, R. (2005). Visual literacy in higher education. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative,
RetrievedJanuary24, 2012 fromhttp:/net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eli4001.pdf
Braden, R.A.(1996). Visual Literacy. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for
educational communications and technology (pp.491-520).New York
: Simon&Schuster.
Brill, J.M.(2007). Visual literacy defined-the results of a delphi study: Can IVLA
(operationally) define visual literacy? Journal of Visual Literacy. 27(1), 47-6
Brumberger, E. (2011). Visual literacy and the digital native: An examination of the millennial learner. Journal of Visual Literacy. 30 (1), 19-46
Dewey, J. (1991). How We Think. New York: Prometheus Books,
Ernst, J.V. & Clark, A.C. (2009). Technology-Based Content through virtual and physical
modeling: A national research study. Journal of Technology Education. 20 (2),
23-36
Felder, R.M.,&Soloman,B.A.(2001).Index of learning styles questionnaire.North Carolina
State University. Retrieved July 10, 2006, from
http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-‐public/ILSpage.html
Felten, P.(2008). Visual literacy. Change 40(6), 60-63.
Furlong, V. J. & Edwards, A. D. (1993). Language in classroom interaction.In M. Hammersley (Eds.) Controversies in Classroom Research. Buckingham, Open University Press.
Gay, L.R.,Airasian, P. &Mills, G.E.(2006). Educational research: Competencies for
analysis and applications (7th ed). Ohio: Merril Prentice Hall,
Hattwig, D., Bussert, K., Medaille, A. & Burgess, J. (2012). Visual literacy standards in
higher education: New opportunities for libraries and student learning. portal:
Libraries and the Academy, 13, 61–89
Hattwig,D., Burgess, J., Bussert, K., & Medaille, A. (2011). Visual Literacy Competency Standards forHigher Education. Association of College&Research Libraries, http://www.acrl.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/visualliteracy.pdf
Hodes, C.L. (1998). Understanding visual literacy. Journal of Visual Literacy. 18(2), 131-
136
Howe, A. (1999). A visual literacy – Why not?. The Journal of Design and Technology
Education. 4 (3), 215-222
Heinich, R. Molenda, M.  Russel, J.D. (1989) Instructional media and new
Technologies of ınstruction.(Third Edition). Macmillan Publishing Company.
Heppner, P. & Peterson, C.H.(1982) “The Development and Implications of a Personal
Problem Solving Inventory”,Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29: 66-75.
Heppner, P.(1978) A review of the problem solving literature and it’s relationship to the counseling process. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 25, 366-375.
126 Görsel Okuryazarlık Eğitiminin Öğretmen Adaylarının… G. Bangir Alpan
IVLA -International Visual Literacy Association.(21.01.2012). What is “visual literacy?”. Web: http://www.ivla.org/org_what_vis_lit.htm
Kalaycı, N. (2001). Sosyal Bilgilerde Problem Çözme ve Uygulamalar . Ankara: Gazi
Kitabevi
Lohr, L. (2008). Creating graphics for learnig and performance: Lessons in visual
literacy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York : Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E.  Sims V. K. (1994). For whom ıs a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86 (3) 389-401
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Metros, S.E.& Woolsey, K. (2006). Visual literacy: An institutional imperative.Educausa
Review, 41(3), 80-81.
Miller, H.B. & Burton, J.K. (1994). Images and imagery theory. Visual Literacy, A
Spectrum of Visual Learning, D.M. Moore. & F.M. Dwyer. (65-84) Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Oblinger, D. (2003). Boomers, Gen-Xers, and Millennials: Understanding the new
students. Educause Review. 37-47. Retrieved January 26, 2012 from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0324.pdf
Riesland, E.(2005). Visual literacy and the classroom. New Horizons for Learning, Retrieved January 24, 2012, from http://www.newhorizons.org
Sosa, T.(2009). Visual literacy: The missing piece of your technology integration course.
TechTrends, 53(2),55-58
Pettersson, R. (2009). Visual literacy and message design. TechTrends, 53(2),38-40
Pettersson, R. (2006). Research in information design. Journal of Visual Literacy. 26(1),
77-88
Pettersson, R. (1993). Visual information. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational
Technology Publications.
Phillips, L. (2005). Look and see: Using the visual environment as access to literacy. Research Brief .Pasific Resources for Education and Learning (PRE) .6pp Retrieved January 26,2012 from ERIC database
Romizowsky, A. J. (1968). Designing Instructional System, Kogan Page, London, New York: Nichols Publishing.
Savaşır I.& Şahin, H. N,(1997).Bilişsel-Davranışçı Terapilerde Değerlendirme: Sık
Kullanılan Ölçekler,Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları 9, Ankara:Özyurt
Matbaacılık
Seglem, R.&Witte, S. (2009). You gotta see it to believe it: Teaching visual literacy in the
English classroom.Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 53(3), 216-226.
Senemoğlu, N. (2004) Gelişim, Öğrenme ve Öğretim. Kuramdan Uygulamaya, Ankara.
Gazi Kitabevi.
Seylan ,A. (2005).Temel Tasarım. Samsun: M-Kitap
Şahin, N., Şahin, N.H. & Heppner, P.P. (1993) "Psychometric Properties of The Problem
Solving Inventory (PSI) In A Group of Turkish University Students". Cognitive
Therapy and Research, 17, 379-96.
Uçar, Z.T. ve Altun, A. (2006). Sorun çözme becerilerinin öğretimi. A. Şimşek. (Ed.),
İçerik Türlerine Dayalı Öğretim (pp. 101-131) Ankara: Nobel yayın Dağıtım
Ülgen, G. (2001). Kavram Geliştirme. Ankara: PegemA yayıncılık.
Yeh, H.T. & Lohr, L.(2010). Towards evidence of visual literacy: Assessing pre-service
teachers’ perceptions of instructional visuals, Journal of Visual Literacy. 29(2),
Ahi Evran Ünv. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), Cilt 14, Sayı 3, Aralık 2013 127
183-197
Yeh, H.T. & Cheng, Y.C. (2010). The influence of the instruction of visual design
principle on improving pre-service teachers’ visual literacy. Computers &
Education. 54(1),244-252.
Yenawind, P.(1997). Thoughts on visual literacy. In J. Flood, S. B. Heath & D. Lapp
(Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching Literacy through the
Communicative and Visual Arts (pp. 845-847) New York: Macmillan Library
Reference USA.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com