Jinekolojide Robotik Cerrahinin Yeri

1. N ezhat F. Minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic
oncology: Laparoscopy versus robotics. Gynecol Oncol
2008:111(2):29-32.
2. M arescaux J, Leroy J, Rubino F, Smith M, Vix M, Simone
M, Mutter D. Transcontinental robot-assisted remote
telesurgery: Feasibility and potential applications. Ann
Surg 2002;235(4):487-92.
3. Yates DR, Vaessen C, Roupret M. From Leonardo to Da
Vinci: The history of robot-assisted surgery in urology.
BJU Int 2011;108: 1708-14.
4. L iu H, Lawrie TA, Lu D, Song H, Wang L, Shi G. Robotassisted
surgery in gynaecology. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev 2014;10(12).
5. De Wilde RL , Herrmann A. Robotic surgery - advance
or gimmick? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol
2013;27(3):457-69.
6. P ugin F, Bucher P, Morel P. History of robotic surgery:
From AESOP ® and ZEUS ® to da Vinci®. J Visc Surg.
2011;148(5):3-8.
7. Falcone T, Goldberg J, Garcia-Ruiz A, Margossian H,
Stevens L. Full robotic assistance for laparoscopic tubal
anastomosis: A case report. Journal of Laparoendoscopic
and Advanced Surgical Techniques-Part A 1999;9(1):107-
13.
8. Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Tsui J, Ananth CV, Lewin SN ,
Lu YS, Neugut AI , Hershman DL. Nationwide trends in
the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United
States. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122 : 233-41.
9. Jacoby VL, Autry A, Jacobson G, Domush R, Nakagawa
S, Jacoby A. Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy
compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches.
Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1041-8.
9
Jinekolojide Robotik Cerrahinin Yeri
Akd Tıp D / Akd Med J / 2016; 1: 5-10
10. Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN , Burke WM, Lu YS,
Neugut AI , Herzog TJ, Hershman DL. Robotically
assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with
benign gynecologic disease. JAMA 2013;309:689-98.
11. L im PC, Kang E, Park do H. A comparative detail analysis
of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic
hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic
hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of
endometrial cancer: A case-matched controlled study of
the first one hundred twenty two patients. Gynecol Oncol
2011; 120:413-8.
12. S inha R, Sanjay M, Rupa B, Kumari S. Robotic surgery
in gynecology. J Minim Access Surg 2015 ;11(1):50-9.
13. Cronin B, Sung VW, Matteson KA. Vaginal cuff
dehiscence: Risk factors and management. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 2012;206:284-8.
14. U ccella S, Ceccaroni M, Cromi A, Malzoni M, Berretta
R, De Iaco P, Roviglione G, Bogani G, Minelli L,
Ghezzi F. Vaginal cuff dehiscence in a series of 12.398
hysterectomies: Effect of different types of colpotomy and
vaginal closure. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:516-23.
15. R ettenmaier MA , Abaid LN , Brown JV 3rd, Mendivil
AA , Lopez KL, Goldstein BH. Dramatically reduced
incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence in gynecologic
patients undergoing endoscopic closure with barbed
sutures: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2015;
14;19:27-30.
16. N ezhat C, Lavie O, Hsu S, Watson J, Barnett O, Lemyre
M. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared
with standard laparoscopic myomectomy-A retrospective
matched control study. Fertil Steril 2009;91:556-9.
17. Gargiulo AR , Srouji SS , Missmer SA , Correia KF,
Vellinga TT, Einarsson JI. Robot-assisted laparoscopic
myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic
myomectomy Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:284-91.
18. Barakat EE , Bedaiwy MA , Zimberg S, Nutter B,
Nosseir M, Falcone T. Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic,
and abdominal myomectomy: A comparison of surgical
outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:256-65.
19. A dvincula AP , Xu X, Goudeau S 4th, Ransom SB. Robot
assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal
myomectomy: A comparison of short-term surgical
outcomes and immediate costs. J Minim Invasive Gynecol
2007;14:698-705.
20. A scher-Walsh CJ, Capes TL. Robot-assisted laparoscopic
myomectomy is an improvement over laparotomy in
women with a limited number of myomas. J Minim
Invasive Gynecol 2010;17:306-10.
21. P itter MC, Gargiulo AR , Bonaventura LM , Lehman JS,
Srouji SS . Pregnancy outcomes following robot-assisted
myomectomy. Hum Reprod 2013;28:99-108.
22. R amavath KK, Murthy PS . Robotic sacrocolpopexy: An
observational experience at mayoclinic, USA . J Gynecol
Endosc Surg 2011;2:53-7.
23. P araiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CC, Barber MD.
Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for
vaginal prolapse: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet
Gynecol 2011;118:1005-13.
24. A nger JT, Mueller ER , Tarnay C, Smith B, Stroupe
K, Rosenman A, Brubaker L, Bresee C, Kenton K.
Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a
randomized controlled trial .Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:5-
12.
25. Francis SL , Agrawal A, Azadi A, Ostergard DR, Deveneau
NE . Robotic Burch colposuspension: A surgical case and
instructional video. Int Urogynecol J 2015;26(1):147-8.
26. N ezhat FR, Sirota I. Perioperative outcomes of robotic
assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional
laparoscopy surgery for advanced-stage endometriosis.
JSLS 2014;18(4).
27. S iesto G, Ieda N, Rosati R, Vitobello D Robotic surgery
for deep endometriosis: A paradigm shift. Int J Med Robot
2014; 10(2):140-6.
28. Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle
AW, Hunt S. Comparison of outcomes and cost for
endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy,
standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecologic
Oncology 2008;111(3):407-11.
29. Cardenas-Goicoechea J, Adams S, Bhat SB, Randall TC.
Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging
for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional
laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical
center. Gynecologic Oncology 2010;117(2):224-8.
30. Coronado PJ, Herraiz MA , Magrina JF, Fasero M, Vidart
JA. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of
robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy
for endometrial cancer. European Journal of Obstetrics,
Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2012;165(2):289-
94.
31. R eynisson P, Persson J. Hospital costs for robot
assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and
pelvic lymphadenectomy. Gynecologic Oncology
2013;130(1):95-9.
32. Gaia G, Holloway RW, Santoro L, Ahmad S, Di Silverio E,
Spinillo A. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial
cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and
laparotomy approaches: a systematic review. Obstet
Gynecol 2010;116(6):1422-31.
33. Kilgore JE, Jackson AL , Ko EM , Soper JT, Van Le L,
Gehrig PA , Boggess JF. Recurrence-free and 5-year
survival following robotic-assisted surgical staging for
endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2013;129(1):49-
53.
10
Doğan S ve Şimşek T
Akd Tıp D / Akd Med J / 2016; 1: 5-10
34. P ark HK, Helenowski IB, Berry E, Lurain JR, Neubauer
NL . A comparison of survival and recurrence outcomes
in patients with endometrial cancer undergoing
robotic versus open surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol
2015;22(6):961-7.
35. L owe MP , Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA , Johnson PR ,
Tillmanns TD. A multi-institutional experience with
robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage
cervical cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 2009;113(2):191-4.
36. N ezhat FR, Datta MS , Liu C, Chuang L, Zakashansky
K. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic
radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for
treatment of early cervical cancer. Journal of the Society
of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2008;12(3):227–37.
37. P ersson J, Reynisson P, Borgfeldt C, Kannisto P, Lindahl
B, Bossmar T. Robot assisted laparoscopic radical
hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with short
and long term morbidity data. Gynecologic Oncology
2009;113(2):185–90.
38. S oliman PT, Langley G, Munsell MF, Vaniya HA ,
Frumovitz M, Ramirez PT. Analgesic and antiemetic
requirements after minimally invasive surgery for early
cervical cancer: A comparison between laparoscopy
and robotic surgery. Annals of Surgical Oncology
2013;20(4):1355–9.
39. S hazly SA , Hassan Murad M, Dowdy SC, Gostout BS,
Famuyide AO . Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage
cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gynecol Oncol 2015 June ;8258(15):30030-5 Epub ahead
of print.
40. P ersson J, Kannisto P, Bossmar T. Robot-assisted
abdominal laparoscopic radical trachelectomy.
Gynecologic Oncology 2008;111(3):564-7.
41. P lante M. Vaginal radical trachelectomy: an update.
Gynecologic Oncology 2008;111(2):105-10.
42. Finger TN, Nezhat FR. Robotic-assisted fertility-sparing
surgery for early ovarian cancer. Journal of the Society of
Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2014;18(2):308–13.
43. Verheijen R, Zweemer R. Robotic surgery for
gynaecologic cancer: an overview. Current Oncology
Reports 2012;14(6):544–9.
44. M agrina JF, Zanagnolo V, Noble BN, Kho RM , Magtibay
P. Robotic approach for ovarian cancer: Perioperative and
survival results and comparison with laparoscopy and
laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2011;121:100–5.
45. S inno AK, Fader AN . Robotic-assisted surgery in
gynecologic oncology. Fertil Steril. 2014 ;102(4):922-32.