You are here

Home » Content

CLASS II KOMPOZİT REZİN RESTORASYONLARDA RETANSİ YON OLUKLARININ MİKROSIZINTI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

THE EFFECT OF RETENTION GKOOVES ON MICROEEAKAGE IN CLASS II COMPOSITE RESİN RESTORATIONS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2001

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, the effect of retention grooves on microleakage in Class TT composite resin reslorcUions was investigated. In tJio study 40 sound premolar teeth were used. In each tooth one mesial and one distal class IT slot preparations were created. The retention grooves were prepared in the box cavities on mesial surface of each tooth. The retention grooves at [he buccal and lingual edges were extending from gingival to occlusal lace. The teeth were restored by using Tetric Ccram, Tetric How, Hehoprogrcss and Z100. After the restorations, the teeth were thermocyqled and immersed in %0-5 basic 1'ucsin solution. After sectioning the specimens, the dye penetration at margins was evaluated under the stcreoinicroscope. 'Flic results of the study revealed that the restorations with retention grooves yielded less leakage.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu ^Iışmarîa, Class II kompozit rezin restorasyonlarda, retansiyon oluklarının mikrosızıntı Üzerindeki etkisi değerlendirildi. Çalışmada 40 sağlam premolar diş kullanıldı. Her dişin mezialtnde ve dislalindc Class II kutu kav i id er hazırlandı- Her dişin mesial yüzündeki kutu kavitelere retansiyon olukları açıldı. Bukal ve lingualdcki retansiyon olukları gingival tabandan okluzal yüzeye kadar uzanıyordu. Dişler Tetric Ceram, Tetrjc Flaw, Helioprogress ve Z1Ü0 ile restore edildi. Bunu takiben Lcrınal siklus uygulandı ve %0.5 lik bazik fuksin solüsyonunda bırakıldı. Kcsîtlcr alınarak diş temeklerinde oluşan boya penetrasyonu stereomikroskûpaltında değerlendirildi. Elde edilen sonullara göre, retansiyon oluyu içeren restorasyonlar da daha az sıkıntı olduğu gözlemlendi.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-class-ii-kompozit-rezin-restorasyonlarda-retansi-yon-oluklarinin-mikrosizinti-uzerine-etkisi.pdf
  • 2
20-24
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Abouslıala A, Kugcl ti, Hurley K. Class ti composite resin restorations using glass-ionomer liners: mİLTOİeakagc studies. Clin Pediair Dent 1996; 21(1): 67-70.
2. Ben-Amar A, Liberman R, Nordcnberg D, Metzgcr Z. The effect of retention grooves on gingival marginal leakage in class !I posterior composite resin restoration..! Oral Rehabil 1998; 15: 325-331.
Atatürk (Jniv.Diş. Hek.Fak Derg. Ciltli, Sayı:2, Sayfa:20-24^001
DARENDELİLER YAMAN, AYDIN BODRUMLU, ER, KARA RAY
3. Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 60-69.
4. Blixt M, Colt P. The influence of lining techniques on the marginal seal of class II composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1993; 24:203-210
5. Coli P, Biixt M, Brannstrom M. The effect, of cervical grooves on the contraction gap in class 2 composites. OpcrDent 1993; 18:33-36.
6. Coli P, Dcrhami K, Brannstrom M, In vitro marginal leakage around class 11 composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts. Quintessence Int 1997¬28;755760
7. Crim Ga, Chapman KW. Reducing microleakage in class 11 restorations: An invitro study. Quintessence Inl 1994; 25:781-785.
8. Estefan AM, Estefan D. Mieroleakage study of flowable composite resin systems.Compend Contin Educ Dent 2000;21:705-712.
9. Feilzer AJ, DeGee AJ, Davidson CL. Curing contraction of composites and glass ionorner cements J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59: 297-300.
10. Fıtchie JG, Puckett AD, Reeves GW, John MH Microleakagc of a new denial adhesive comparing microfilled and hybrid resin composites. Quintessence Int 1995;26:505-510.
1 I. Futalsuki M, Nakata M. In vitro marginal leakage of class II composite resin restorations by th cycling. J Clin Pçdiatr Dent 1994; 18(3): 191-196.
12. Hilton TJ, Schwartz. RS, Ferracane JL Mjcroleakage of four class!! resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quintessence Int 1997¬28:235-144. ' '
13. Hinoura K, Sctcos JC, Phillips KW. Cavity design and placement techniques for class II composites OpcrDent 1988; 13:12-19.
14. Molan G, Hidelman E, Wright GZ. 1'hc effect, of internal bevel nn marginal leakage at the approximal surface of class 2 composite restorations. Opcr Dent I997;22(5): 217-221.
15. Hugo B, Stassinakis A, Hofmani] N, Sohmilz B, Klaibcr B. In vitro study of marginal quality of small appmximal composite Filling. Schwei/, Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2001; 111:19-27.
16. Mazer R0, Russell RR. The use of flowable composites m class V restorations (abstract). J Dent Res 1998 ; 67: J 3 L Abstract 202.
17. Lplz F, Krejci I, Rarbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 199!; 7:107-113
18. Opdam N.IM r Roeters JJM, Kııijs Ruud, Burgersdijk RCW. Necessity of bevels tor box only class il composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 274-279.
19. Owens BM, Halter TK, Brown DM. Microlcakage of tooth-colored restorations with a beveled gingival margin. Quintessence Int 1998;29:356-361-
20. Shahani DR, Menezcs JM. The effect of reienlion grooves on posterior composite resin restorations: An in vitro microleakagc study, öper Dent 1992' 17:156-164.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com