You are here

Home » Content

AKRİLİK REZINLERIN GÜÇLENDİRİLME YÖNTEMLERİ

THE REINFORCEMKNT OF DENTURE BASK RESINS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2002

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Since the early 1940's. poly methyl methaerylale has become the most commonly used denture base material, Color stability, easy manıjpulatiürı, polishing and repair arc desirable properties of PMMA. However, the fracLure of dentures during service Ls an important problem. To improve and strengthen the mechanical properties of dental polymers, the structure of denture base renin modified, or reinforcing the resin with ıhı- addition of the materials like metals, carbon, aramid, polyethylene fiber
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Polimeri Imetakri fal, 1940'lardîuı beri. kııidc plağı yapımında sıklıkla kiilla.nili.in bir materyaldir. PMMA'ııı arzu edilen tf/.dİlkleri, renk stabilkesi, kolay uygulanabilmesi, pohsajlanahilmiisi vc tamir edilebilmesidir. Ancak kullanım sırasında meydana, gelen kaide plağı kırıkları, halen önemli bir problem oJusUirmakiadir. Denial polimerlerin mekanik özelliklerinin geliştirilmesi ve güçlendirilmesi için,, ya rey in m yapısı modifiye edilmekte, yada re/in içersine metaller, karbon, aram id, poüetilen ve cam fiber gibi materyaller eklenmektedir. Makalede, bu konuda güniimii/.e kadar yapılmış olan anıştırma ve gelişmeler hakkında bilgi verilmiş ve tartışılmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-akrilik-rezinlerin-guclendirilme-yontemleri.pdf
  • 1
46-53
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1- AI Mulla
MAS
, Hugget R, Brodes SC, Murphy WM, Some physical and mechanical properties of a visible lighi-activatcdrnaleria!.Dent Mater 1998:4: lf/7-200.
2- Andcrson JN. Applied Dental Materials, .'5th cd. Oxford; Blackwell Scientific 1976; 269-274.
3- Andreopoulos AG, Papaspyrides CD, Tsilibounidis S. Surface treated polyethylene fibers as reinforcement of acrylic resins. Biomalerials 1991; 12(1); 83-S7.
4- Andreopoulos AG, Polyzois GL, Demetriou PI'. Repairs with visible light-curing denture base materials. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 703-706.
5- Andreopoulos AG, Polyzois GI . Repair of denture base resins using visible light-cured materials. .1 Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 462^68.
6- Bergc M. Bending strength of intact and repaired denture base resins. Acta Odont Seand 1983;41: 187-191.
7- BcjTong IM, Weed PM, Young JM. Fracture resistance ol" Kevlar- rein forced poly(mctyl methacrylatc) resin: a preliminary siudv. Int J Prosthodont 1990: 3: 391-395.
S-Berry HH. Funk QJ. Vitallium strengthens to prevent lower denture breakage. J Prosthet Dent 1971; I 37:
532-536.
9- Bcv]i MS, von Fraunhofer JA. Repair of fractured acrylic rcsm. .1 Irosthet Dent 1980; 44: 497-503.
10- Bcyli MS, von Fraunhofer JA. An analysis of causes ol fracture of acrylic resin dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1981: 46: 238-241.
11- Bowman A.I, Manley TR. The elimination of breakages in upper dentures by reinforcement with carbon fibre. Br Dent I 1984; 156: 87-89.
12- Braden M. Davy KWM, Parker S, Ward IM. Denlure base poly(mcthyl methacrylatc} reinforced with ultra-high modulus polvethvlene fibres. Br Dent J 1988; 164: 109-113.
13- Carlos B, Harrison A, The effect of untreated UHMPE beads on sonic properties of acrylic resin denture base material .1 Dent 1996; 25: 59-64.
14- Carroll CE, von Frawnhofcr .IA. Wire reinforcement of acrylic resin protheses. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52: 639-641.
15- Cheng YY, Ilui OL, Ladizesky MH. Processing shrinkage of heat-curing acrylic resin reinforced with high performance polvethvlene fibres. Biomalerials 1993; 14: 775-7S0.12. Sayul. Sa>fa:46-53.2002
YILMAZ, AYDIN
16- Chow IW, Cheng YY, Ladizesky NH. Polyethylene fibre reinforced poly (methyl melhacrylate) dimensional cliangcs during immersion. ,1 Dent 1993; 21: 367-372.
17- Chow TW, Ladizesky NH, Clarke DA. Acrylic resins reinforced with woven highly drawn linear polvethvlene fibers 2- water sorption and clinical trials. Aust Dent J 1992; 37(6): 433-438.
18- Cfilig RG. Restorative Dental Materials 9cd. Mosby Year Rook, St [.ouis: 1993; 505.
19- Cunnigiiam JL. Bond strength of denture teeth to acrylic bases. J Dent 1993; 21; 274.
20^Çulıkkocaoğlu S Tam Protezler, Cilt 2. 3.Baskı Tcknografik .İstanbul, 1998.
21- Drabour UR,
Hugget
t R. Harrison A. Denture fracture-a survey. Br Dent J 1994; 176: 342-345.
22- Dc Boer J, Vcrwilyen SCi. Brady UK. The el'lecl of carbon fiber orientation on the falique resistance and bending properties of two denture resins. ,1 Prosthet Dent 1984;51:119-121.
23- Dixon DL, Breeding LC. The transverse strcnelhs of three denture base resins reinforced with polyethylene fibers. J Pros-fict Dent 1992; 67: 417-419.
24- Ekstrand K. Ruytcr IE, Wcllcndorf H. Carbon/graphite fiber reinforced poly (methyl mcthacrvlatc): properties under dry and wet conditions. J Biomed"Mater Res 1987; 21: 1065-1080.
25- Fellman S. Visible light-cured denture base resin used in working dentures with conventional teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 356-359.
26- Grajower R, Goultschm J. The transverse strength of acrylic resin strips and of repaired acrylic samples..! Oral Rehabil 1984; II: 237-247.
27- Grave AMH, Chandler HD, Woifaardt JF. Denture base acrvlic reinforced with high moduolus fibre. Dent Mater 1985; 1: 185-187.
28- Guttcridgc DL. The effect of including ultra-high modulus poiycthyicne fibre on the impact strength of acrylic resin. Br Dent J 1988; 164: 177-180.
29- GutLcridgc DL. Reinforcement of polyfmethyl mcthacrvlatc) with ultra-higli-modulus polyethylene fibre. J Dent 1992:20:50-54.
30- 1 largreaves AS. The prevalence of fractured dentures. A survey. Br Dent J 1969; 126: 451-455.
31- IIargrcavcs AS. Polymcthyl mcthacrylate as a denture base material in service J Oral Rchabil 1975; 2: 97-104.
32- Jagger RG, Huggett R. The effect of cross-linking on indentation resistance, creep and recovery of an acrvlic resin denture base material. J Dent 1975; 3': 15-18.
33- Jagger DC, Harrison A, Jandt KD. The; reinforcement of dentures. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26:385-194.
34- Jetinings RE, Wveiibbcnharst AM. The effect of metal reinforcements on the tranversc strength of acrvlic resin..! Dent Child 1960; 27: 162-168.
35- fAdi/esky NH. Ward IM. A study of Ihe adhesion of drawn polvethvlene fibre, polymeric resin systems. J Mater Sci 1983; 18(7): 533-544.
36- Ladizesky NH, Chow TW. The effect of intererface adhesion, water immersion and anatomical notches on the mechanical properties of denture base resins reinforced with continuous high performance polvethvlene fibres. Aus Dent J 1992; 37(4): 277-289.
37- T.,adİ7.csky
NH
, Chow TW. Reinforcement of complete denture bases wiLh continuous high performance fibres. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68(6): 934-941.
38- Ladizesky Nh. Ho CF, Chow _ TW.
Reinforcement of complete denture bases with continuous high performance polyethylene fibers. J Pro s he t Dent 1992; 68: 934-939.
39- Ladizesky NH, Cheng YY, Chow TW, Waiti IM. Acrylic resin reinforced with chopped high performance polyethylene fiber, I'roperties and denture construction. Dent Mater 1993: 9: I 28^135.
40- Ladizcsky Nil, hang MKM. Chov\ TW, Ward IM. Acrylic resins reinforced winth woven highly drawn linear polyethylene fibres. 3 Mechanical properties and further aspects of denture construction. Aust Dent J 1993; 38(1): 28-38.
41- Levinstein L Zellser C. Mayer CM, 'lal Y. Transverse bond strenfth of repaired acrylic resin strips and temperature rise of dentures relined with VLC reline resin. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74: 392-399.
42- Manley TR, Bowman AC, Cook M. Denture bases reinforced with carbon fibers. Br Dent J 1979; 146:
25.
43-M at s umura H, Nakabayashi N. Adhesive 4 MFTA/MMA-TTB opaque resin with poly(mclhyl mcthacrvlatc)- coated titanium dioxide. J Dent Res 1988 67: 29-3*2.
44- Mc Goric JW, Anderson JN. Transverse strength repairs with self curing resins. Br Dent J i960; 109: 364-366.
45- Micttincn VM. Vallittu PK\ Release of a residual methyl methacrylatc into water from glass fiber polymcthyl melhacrylate composite used in dentures. Biomaterials 1997; 18: 181-185.
46- Polyzois GL, Andreopoulos AG, Lagouvardos PH. Acrylic resin denture repair with adhesive resin and melal wires: Effects of strength parameters. J ProslheS Dent 19%; 75: 381-387.
47- Pour d eyh imi B, Wagner HD. Elastic and ultimate properties of acrylic bone cement, reinforced with ultra-high molecular weisrlh polyethylene fibers. J Biomed Mater Res 1989; 23: 63-80.
48- Ramus V, Runyan DA, Chnstensen LC". The effect of plasma treated polyethylene fiber on the fracture strength ol polymethyl methacrylatc. J Prosthet Dent 1996: 76: 94-96.49- Ruffîno AR.
Effec
t of steel strengtlıcncrs on fracture resistance of the acrylic resin complete denture base*. .1 Prosthet Dent 1985; 54:75-78.
50- Ruyler IE, Ekstarnd K, Bjorfc N. Development or carbon /grafite fibre reinforced pdy(mcthyl melhacrylate} suitable for implant-fixed dental bridges. Dent Mater 1996; 2: 6-9.
51- Schreibcr CK. Polymcthyl methaervlate reinforced with carbon fibers, Br Dent J 1971; 130: 29-30.
52- Schreiber CK. The clinical application of carbon libre/ polymer denture bases. Br Dent J 1974; 137; 21-22.
53- Sehagpal SB, Sood VK. Effect of fibers on some physical proteinics of acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 746-751.
55- Srrfnit GS. The effect of metliyi methacrvlate reinforcement with silane-lreated and untreaLed glass fibers. .1 I'rosthct Dent 1991; 66: 310-314.
56- Stipho HD, Slipho AS. Effectiveness and durability of repaired acrvlic resin points. .1 Proshet Dent 1987; 58: 249-2.53.
57- Stipho HD. Effect of a glass fiber reinforcement on some mechanical properties of aııtopolymcrı/ing polymefhyi methaciylate. .1 Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 580-584.
58- Slipho HD. Repair of acrylic resin denture base resin reinforced with glass fiber, J Prosthet Dent 1998; SO: 546-550.
59- Tanaka T, Nagata K. Takeyama M, Atsuta M, Nakabayashi N.Masuhara H, 4 META opaque resin. A new resin strongly adhesive to nickel-chromium alloy. .1 Dent Res 1981 ;60t: 1697-1706.
60- Underwadc JH, Sidhaye AB: touring acrylic resin in a domestic pressure cooker: a study of residual monomers content. Quintessence bit 1989; 20(2): 123-129.
61- Uzuu G, Hersek N, Tinçcr T- Hffect of five woven fiber reinforcements on the impact and transverse strength of a denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent 1999; Si: 616-620.
62- Vailittu PK, Lassila VP. Reinforcement of acrylic denture base material with metil or fiber strength en ers. J Oral Rehabil 1992; 19:225-230-
63- Valhttn PK. Effect of some properties of metal slrcnglhne.SK on the fracture resistance of acrylic denture base ınateriaJ. J Oral Rehabil 1993 ; 20:241-248.
64- Vallittn PK. Comparison of two different silanc compound used for improving adhesion between fibers and acrylic denture base material. .1 Oral Rehabil 1993; 20: 533-539.
65- Vallittu PK, Lassila VP, Lappalainen R, Acrylic resin -fiber composite. Part I; The effect of fiber concentration on fracture resistance. J l*rosthet Dent 1994; 71: 607-612.
66- Vallittu PK. Acrylic resin-fiber composite Part II: The effect of polymerization shrinkage of polymcthyl melhacrylate applied to fiber roving on transverse strength. .1 Proshet Dent 1994;71:613-617.
67- Vallittu PK, Lassila VP, Lappalainen R, Transverse strength and fatigue of denture acrylic glass fiber composite. Dental Mfiter"İ994; 10: 116-121."
68- Vallittu PK. The effect ol void space and polymerization lime on transverse strength of acrylic-glass fibre composite. J Oral Rehab 1995; 22: 257-261.
69- Vallittu PK, Vujthova H, lassila VP. Impact strength of denture polymctyl mclhacrylate reinforced with continuous ulass fibers or metal wire. Acta Odontol Scand 1995; 53: 392-396.
70- Vallittn PK. A comparison of in vitro fatigue resistance of an acrylic resin removable partini denture reinforced with continuous glass fiber or metal wires. J Prosthodont 1996; 5: 1 15-121.
71 -Vallittu PK. Glass fiber reinforcement in repaired acrylic resin removable denkrres: Preliminary results of clinical study. Quintessence lilt 1997; 28: 39-44.
72- Vallittu PK, Narva K, Impact strength of a modified continuous glass fiber-polv(methyl methacrylatc). Int .1 Prosthodont 1997; 10(2): 142-1"48.
73- Vallittu PK. Some aspects of the tensile strength of unidirectional glass fiber polymetylmcthacrylate composite used in dentures- .1 Oral Rehabil 1998: 25; 100, E 05.
74- Vallittu PK, FlcMiral properties of acrylic resin polymer reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1999; SI: 318-326.
75- Viguie G. Malquart G, Vincent B, Bourgeois D. Epoxy carbon composite resins in dentistry: Mechanical properties related to fiber reinforcement. J ProsLhet Dent 1994; 72(3): 245-249.
76- Ward JE, Moon I'C, Levinc RA, Hohrendt CL. Hffect of repair surface design, repair materials and processing method on the tranverse strength of repair acrylic denture resin. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: S3 5-820.
77- Wiskott HWA, Nicholls JT, Bclscr UC Stress falique: Basic principles and prosthodonbe implication. Int J Prosthndoni 1995; 8: 105-116.
78- Wvlegala RT. Reinforcing denture base materia! with carbon fibres. Dent Tech] 973; 26: 29-30.
79- Yaidenie N, Mahood M. Carbon fiber acrylic resin composite. An investigation of transvers strength. J l^oshetDcnt 1985. 54: 543-547,

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com