You are here

Home » Content

ENDODONTİK TEDAVİ GÖRMÜŞ DİŞLERİN POST SİSTEMLERİYLE RESTORASYONU

RESTORATION OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TOOTH WITH POST SYSTEMS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2003

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In recent vears, due to developments in the science of endodontics we can restore much more numbers of" teeth (JUL, 11JV1II 1EI I U LI >. 11V" I - ' • Lnjut "|' UIULJ-.. . . fixed bridges if the coronal section of the tooth has large deffects. At this condition if there is not enough retention for the core, a post system can be used by inserting into the root canal. There are many kinds of post systems that we can apply for diffrcnt indications. The aim of this study is to find out which post system is suitable for our eradication and explain how uc can apply it with long term success.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Son yıllarda cndodonli bilimindeki ilerlemelerle birlikte daha çok sayıda dişi restore edip fonksiyona soka-bilmektcyiz. KuronaJ kısmında büyük defektler olan diklerde sabit protetik restorasyon planlaması iciu üniteden bir core yapının hazırlan m ası gerekmekledir. Bıı durumda core yapının reiansiyonu için yeterli diş dokusu kalmamışsa kök kanalına yerleştirilecek bir post sistemi kullanabiliriz. Farklı endikasyoıılar için bir çok post si »temi bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı koyduğumuz endikasyona uygun post sisteminin belirlenmesi ve uzun donem başarıya sahip olacak uygulama şekillerinin açıklanmasıdır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-endodontik-tedavi-gormus-dislerin-post-sistemleriyle-restorasyonu.pdf
  • 1
72-80
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

3. Akkayan H, Canikoglu B. Resistance ta fracture of crowned tecili restored with different post systems. Eur J ProsthodoriL tics Dent ]99Stf: I3-] 8.
2. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomcclianieal consideration in restoring enodontically treated teetlı. J Pioslhet Dent 1994.71:565-67. Krastca K. Clinical application of a fiber reinforced post system. J Endodon 2001:27:132-3.
3. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK. Dcutsch AS, Musi kant HI,. Fracture strength of three core restorative materials supported with or without a prefabricated splint-shsink post, J Proslhel Dent 1997;7S;560-5.
4 Dean JP, Jeansonne BG. In vitro evaluation of a carbon fiLicr post. J Fndodon 1 WB;24:807-10.
5. Duncan JP, Pamcijcr CM. Retention of parallel-sided titanium posts cemented with S!\ luting agents; An ill vitro study. ,1 Proslhet Dent 1998,80:423.
6. Hemandes AS. Dessai GS. Factors allectmg the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:355-363.
79
Atatürk ı '.m Diş Hek.FakDerg. C1l:l3, Sayıtl. Sayfa:72-K0,2003
ÇAKMAKÇI OĞLU, AK'l BPE
7. Freilich MA, Meiers JC Duncan JP.Goldberg A.I. Fibcr-rciıılorced composites in clinical dentistry. Quintessence 2000:63-70.
8- Gutnıan, J. I- : The dentin root coiTiplc.vAıtatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J. Proslhet. Dcnt. 67:448-467,192
9. Halpcrn BC.5. Restorative Dentistry Dent Clin North Am 1993;37:367-90.
10. Heifer ,H. R. ve ark: Determination ol the moisture content ül" vital mid pulpiest Mh. Oral sur. Oral Med. ,34:661-70.1972
11. Hochinan N, Zalkind M. New itil ceramic indirect pout and core system..I Proslhet Dent I999;81 ;65.
12. Mudis SI. Goldstein CR Restoration ol" endodontically treated tcettva review of the literature. J Proslhet Dem 1986,55:33-30.
I 3. Johnson, J. K. , Sclivvarc, N. L. : Kvaluation and restoration of endodontically trentcd |X5slerior teeth. J. Am. Dent- Assoc. ,93:597-605 J 976
14. Krastea K- Clinical application of a fiber reinforced post system. J Hndodon 2001 ;27:132-3.
15. Mannocci h, Ferrari M. Watson IT. [iitcrmiuenl loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon quart/ fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. .1 Adhesive Dent 1999;2:153.
16. Martinc/.-lnsua A, Da Silva L, Rilo B. San tana
l.J. Comparison of the fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthel Dent 1998;80:527-32.
17. McArdle BF Hnhaneing the retention of prefabricated metal posts and res in cores. J ADA 2000;131:1470-71.
IS. Men dom DB. Ffl'ecl of the dentinal bonded resin post-core preparations on resistance to vertical root fracture. .T Proslhet Dent 1992;67:768-72.
19. Mendoza DB, Hakle WS. Retention ol" posts, cemented with various dentinal bonding cements. J Proslhet Dent 1994:72:591-4.
20. Mor.sano SM. Mi Kit P. Clinical .success of cast metal post and coes. .1 Prosthet Dent I993;69:1 1-16.
21. MüJİkant RL, Deutsch AS. A new prefabricated post and core system. J Prothci Dent 1984:52:631-34.
22. Rosen,H. : Operative procedures on muliiluted endodontically treated teeth. I. Prosthet. Dent. ,11:972-86,1961
23. Rostnmtl M, Filrcr C, Behr M, Lant; R, Handel Cr. Comparison of in vilro fracture strength ol" metallic and looth coloured posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:59-5.
24. Rosin MSplielh C. Wilkcns M, Meyer G. ['.I I eel of cement type on retention of a tapered post with a sell cuthng double thread. J of Dentistry 2000;2S:577.
25. Shilingburg HI. Fundamentals of Fi.xed Prsthodonlics
26. Tropc.M. . vc ark: Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. F.ndodont- Dent. "I'ranmatol. .1:108-1 1 1.1985
27. Zalkind M, Hochman N. Esthetic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores. .1 Prosthet Dctil 1998:79:702.
28. Zalkınd M. Shkury S. Stern N, Hclmg 1. Kffeet of prefabricated metal post head design on the retention o various core materials. .1 Oral Rchabil 2000:27:483-87.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com