You are here

Home » Content

ENDODONTİK TEDAVİLİ DİŞLERDE ESTETİK POST UYGULAMALARI

APPLICATION OF ESTHETIC POSTS IN ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
The restoration of endodontically treated teeth is one of the most challenging and risky procedure in dental practice. So far, various restorative methods and post systems have been utilized for these types of restorations. The aims of using these systems; providing enough retantion to the core structure by using the right post systems beside esthetics of final fixed restoration. The aim of this review is to evaluate the esthetic post systems used for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Endodontik tedavili dişlerin post ve kor sistemleri ile restorasyonu diş hekimliği pratiğindeki en riskli işlemlerden biridir. Günümüze dek, aşırı madde kaybına uğramış endodontik tedavili dişler farklı restoratif yöntemlerle restore edilmeye çalışılmış ve değişik post sistemleri denenmiştir. Bu sistemleri kullanmanın amacı; final sabit restorasyonun estetiği yanında doğru post sistemini kullanarak kor materyaline yeterli retansiyon sağlanmasıdır. Bu derlemenin amacı, endodontik tedavili dişlerin restorasyonunda kullanılan estetik post sistemlerini genel olarak değerlendirmektir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-endodontik-tedavili-dislerde-estetik-post-uygulamalari.pdf
  • 2
124-130
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Hudis SI, Goldstein GR. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a review of the literature. J Prosthiet Dent 1986; 55: 33-38.
2. Smidt A, Venezia E. Techniques for immediate core
buildup of endodontically treated teeth. QuintessenceInt 2003; 34: 258-268.
3. Bolhuis P, de Gee A, Feilzer A. Influence of fatigue
loading on four post-and-core systems in maxillary premolars. Quintessence Int 2004; 35: 657-667.
4.
Zaimoğl
u A, Can G. Sabit protezler. Ankara Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Yayınları, Yayın no: 24, Ankara, 2004, 183-189.
5.
Yavuzyılma
z H, Ulusoy MM, Kedici PS, Kansu G.
Protetik diş tedavisi terimleri sözlüğü. Türk Prostodonti ve İmplantoloji Derneği, Ankara Şubesi Yayınları, sayı: 1, Ankara, 2003, 72-73.
6.
Van
o M, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Toqnini F, Gabriele
M, Tay FR, Ferrari M.
Th
e adhesion between fibre posts and composite resin cores: the evaluation of microtensile bond strength following various surface chemical treatments to posts. Int Endod J
2006; 39: 31-39.
7. Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, Cury AH, Goracci
C, Ferrari M. Post-surface conditioning improves interfacial adhesion in post/
8. Toksavul S, Zor M, Toman M, Gungor MA, Nergiz I,
Artunc C. Analysis of dentinal stress distribution of maxillary central incisors subjected to various postand- core applications. Oper Dent 2006; 31:
89-96.
9.
Alaça
m T, Nalbant L, Alaçam A. İleri Restorasyon
Teknikleri. 1. Baskı, Polat Basımevi, Ankara, 1998.
10. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 2 nd Ed., The C. V. Mosby Co., St. Louis, 1995.
11. Robbins JW. Guidelines for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. J Am Dent Assoc
1990;120:558-62.
12. Robbins JW. Restoration of endodontically treated tooth. Dent Clin North Am 2002;46: 367-84.
13. Stephen C, Richard CB. Pathways of the Pulp, 8th Edition, 2002.
14. Llyod PM, Palik JF. The philosophies of dowel diameter preparation: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:32-6.
15. Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ. The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: A literature review. Part III, Tooth preparation considerations. J Prosthodont 1995;4:122-8.
16. Stockton LW. Factors affecting retention of post systems: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent
1999;81:380-5.
17. Freedman GA. Esthetic post-and-core treatment. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:103-16.
18. De Sort KD. The prosthodontic use of endodontically treated teeth; theory and biomechanics of post preparation. J Prosthet Dent
1983;49:203-6.
Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
Cilt: 19, Sayı: 2, Yıl: 2009, Sayfa: 124-130
19. Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: A review. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:355-
63.
20. Mendoza DB, Eakle WS. Retention of posts cemented with various dental bonding cements. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:591-4.
21.
Kıvan
ş B. H. Endodontik tedavili dişlerde post uygulamaları. Atatürk Üniv. Di_ Hek. Fak. Derg.
2006, p. 18-23
22. Koutayas SO, Kern M. All-Ceramic Post and Cores. In; The State of the Art. Quintessence Int, 30,
1999, p. 383-392.
23. Robbins JW. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. Dent Clin North Am 2002, 46: 367¬84.
24. Fredriksson M, Astbac KJ, Pamenius M, Arvidson KA. Retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxi-resin post. J Prosthet Dent 1998, 80: 151-157.
25. Morgano SM,Brackett SE. Foundation restorations in fixed prosthodontics: Current Knowladge and future needs. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 643-657.
26. Purton DG, Love RM. Rigidity and retantion of carbon fiber versus stainlees Steel root canal posts. Int Endodon J 1996, 29: 262-5.
27. Purton DG, Payne JA. Comparison of carbon fiber and stainless steel root canal posts. Quintessence
Int 1997, 27: 93-97.
28.
Bilgi
n MS, Öztürk AN. Estetik post sistemleri. SÜ Dişhek Fak Der, 2008, 17: 243-245.
29. Freedman G. The carbon fibre post: metal-free, post-endodontic rehabilitation. Oral Health. 1996 Feb;86(2):23-6, 29-30.
30. Isador F, Omdan P, Brondum K. Intermittent Loading of Teeth Restored Using Prefabricated Carbon Fiber Posts. Int J Prosthodont
1996;9:131-6.
31. Sidoli GE, King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber based post and core system, J Prosthet Dent 1996;78:296
32. Purton DG, Payne JA. Comparison of Carbon Fiber and Stainless Steel Root Canal Posts. Quintessence Int, 27; P:93-7,1997.
33. Koutayas SO, Kern M. All-ceramic posts and cores: The state of the art. Quintessence Int
1999;30:383-92.
CÖKÜK
34. Ivoclar AG. Scientific documentation, Cosmopost/ IPS Empress Cosmo Ingot, Schaan, Liechteinstein,1998.
35. Ferrari M, Scotzi R. Fiber Posts. Characteristics and Clinical Applications. Mason S.p.A., Milano, Italya,
2002.
36. Meyenberg KH, Luthy H, Scharer P. Zirconia posts: A new all-ceramic concept for nonvital abutment teeth. J Esthet Dent 1995;7:73-80. 29.
37. Stockton LW. Factors affecting retention of post systems: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent
1999;81:380-5.
38. Hochman N, Zalkind M. New all ceramic indirect post and core system. J Prosthet Dent
1999;81:625-9.
39. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Retention of selected core materials to zirconia posts. Oper Dent 2002;27:455- 61.
40. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman NI, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Retention of a Core Material Supported by Three Post Head Designs. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:624-8.
41. Uzun G, Hersek N, Tinçer T. Effect of five woven fiber reinforcements on the impact and transverse strength of a denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent,
1999;81:616-620.
42. Keyf F, Uzun G, Mutlu M. The effects of HEMAmonomer and air atmosphere treatment of glass fibre on the transverse strength of a provisional fixed partial denture resin. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:1142-1148.
43. Uzun G, Keyf F. The effect of fiber reinforcement
type and water storage on strength properties of a provisional fixed partial denture resin. J Biomater App, 2003;17:277-286.
44. Keyf F, Uzun G. The effect of glass fiber reinforcement at different concentrations on the transverse strength, deflection and modulus of elasticity of a provisional fixed partial denture resin. J Biomater App, 2001;16:149-156.
45. Miller TE. A new material for periodontal splinting and orthodontic retantion. Compend Cond Educ
Dent. 1993;14:800-812.
46.
Erma
n G. Fiber ile desteklenmiş kompozit rezin postcore restorasyonların, diagonal kuvvetler karşısındaki dayanıklılığının in-vitro incelenmesi, Hacettepe Ü Diş Hek Fak Doktora Tezi, 2001.
129
Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
Cilt: 19, Sayı: 2, Yıl: 2009, Sayfa: 124-130
CÖKÜK
47. Christensen GJ. When to use fillers, build-ups or posts and cores. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:1397-8.
48. Bateman G, Ricketts DNJ, Saunders WP. Fibre-based post systems: a review. Br Dent J
2003;195:43-8.
49. Robbins JW. Restoration of the Endodontically Treated Tooth, Dent Clin North Am 2002; 46:367¬84.
50. Triolo PT, Trajenberg C, Powers JM. Flexural properties and bond strength of an esthetic post, J Dent Res 1999;78:548.
51. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Le Bell- Rönnlöf A-M, Lassila LVJ, Valittu PK, Creugers NHJ. In vitro fracture behaviour of maxillary premolars with metal crowns and several post-and-core systems. Eur J Oral Sci, 2006;114:250-6.
52.
Teze
l H, Güngör MA, Korkut ZO, Farklı Kor Materyallerinin Basma Dayanımlarının Karşılaştırılması, EÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2006; 27:
159-166

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com