You are here

Home » Content

PROTEZ TABAN POSTERİOR PERİFERİK SEAL BOZULMA FARKLI POLİMERİZASYON TEKNİKLERİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT POLYMERIZATION TECHNIQUES ON THE POSTERIOR PERIPHERAL SEAL DISTORTION OF THE DENTURE BASE

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2004

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study was carried out to examine the influence of different polymerization techniques and shapes of palatal vault on the posterior peripheral seal distortion. Three edentulous maxillary casts with different palatal vault shapes (flat, V-shaped, medium depth) were chosen. The casts were duplicated in such R way that there would be 20 for each palatal vault shape. Then the oasts were numbered and covered with two layers of baseplate was. A short-term polymerization technique was applied to half of the waxed samples which were prepared to be of equal number for each palatal shape, while a long-term polymerization technique was applied to the other half. The amount of the contraction due to the polymerization technique and the palatal shape was determined by a measurement of the gap between the base plates and the casts. The measurements were made by the same investigator on the midline of the posterior peripheral seal of the specimens using a microscope. Analysis of variance was used for the evaluation of the results obtained. The effect of polymerization techniques and palatal vault shapes on the posterior palatal seal distortion was found to be statistically significant (P< 0.001). It. was found that palatal depth influenced the distortion in the posterior peripheral seal and the long-term polymerization technique produced less dimensional change than the other one.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada, farklı polimerizasyon tekniklerinin vc damak şeklinin posterior periferat bölgedeki açıklığa etkisi incelendi. Farklı damak şekilli (sığ, V şekilli, orta derin) 3 dişsiz maksin er model seçildi. Her bir damak şeklinden 20 tane olacak şekilde modeller çoğaltıldı. Elde edilen modeller ııumara!fındıktan sonra iki tabaka hazplak mumu ile kaplandı. Her bir damak şeklinden eşit sayıda olacak şekilde hazırlanan mum örneklerin yarısına kusa süreli polimerizasyon tekniği, diğer yarısına ise uzun sureli polimerizasyon tekniği uygulandı. Polimerizasyon tekniğine ve damak şekline bağlı oluşun konEraksiyon miktarı, kaide plakları ile alçı modeller arasındaki açıklık olarak üst protezin posterior peripheral bölgesinde orta hatta bir nıikroskcıp aracılığıyla avnı araştırmacı tarafından ölçülerek saptandı. Eide edilen sonuçların değerlendirilmesi için varyans analizi kullanıldı. Posterior perıferal bölgedeki ayıklık üzerinde, polimerizasyon tekniği ve damak şeklînin etkisinin önemli olduğu (p< 0.001) istatistiksel olarak leşpit edildi. Damak derinliğinin protezin posterior perıferal bölgesindeki açıklığı etkilediği, uzun sureli polimerizasyon tekniğinin de diğer tekniğe göre açıklık üzerinde dalın az etkili olduğu görüldü.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-protez-taban-posterior-periferik-seal-bozulma-farkli-polimerizasyon-teknikleri-uzerine-etkisi.pdf
  • 3
24-30
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

I. Mirza FD. Dimensional stability of acrylic resin dentures-clinical evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 1961; II:
848-851 -
YILMAZ, Y KŞ1L DUYMUŞ DİNÇKAL YANIKOÖLU
2. Becker CM, Smith DH, Nicholls Jf. the comparison of denture base processing techniques. Part 1. Material characteristics. J Prosthet Dent 1977; 37: 330-334.
3. Kraut RA. A comparison of denture base accuracy. .[ Am Dent Assoc 1971 ;83; 252-255.
4. Becker CM, Smith DH, Nicholls JI. The comparison of denture base processing techniques, Part II. Dimensional changes due to processing. J Prosthet Dent 1977; 37; 450-459.
5. Craig RG. Restorative dental materials. 6 th. Ed. CV Mosby Co.St, Louis, 1980: p. 346-381
(S. Aladağ LI, Dinçkal N. İki farklı mufla presleme tekniğine göre bitirilen üst tam protczlcrdeki dikey boyut değişikliğinin incelenmesi (An investigated ot vertical dimensional changes of maxillary dentures according to Lhe different processing). Selçuk Üniv Diş Hck Fak Derg 1996; 6; 121-123.
7. O'Brien W, Ryge G. Wettability of Poly-(Mclhyl methacrylalc) treated with silicone tetrachloride. J Prosthet Dent 1965; 15: 304-307.
8. Calomcri AA, Feldmann KB, Kuebkcr WA. Posterior palatal seal location arid preparation on the maxillary complete denture caul. .1 Prosthet Dent 1983 49; 628-630.
9. Glazier S, Kirlel! DN, Harman LL, PosLcrior peripheral seal distortion related to height of the maxillary ndge. J Prosthet Dent 1980:43: 508-5U.
10. Anthony DH, Peyton FA. Dimensional accuracy of various denture base materials. ,1 IVosthet Dent I9fi2; 12: 67-70,
11. Eîahı JM, Abdalları MA. Effect of different polymerization techniques on dimensional stability ol record bases. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71: 150-153.
12. Baydaş. S, Duymuş Yeşil Z. Isı ile poliıncri/.e edilen akrilik rezlnlcrirı polimeriznsyon yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması fThc comparison of polymerization methods of acrylic resins which are polymerized by heat), Atatürk Üniv Di s Hek Fak Dcrg 2000, 10: 57-60-
29
Atatürk Üniv .Diş Hek.Fak,Dcrg. Cilt: 14, Sayı 3, Sayfa: 24-30 ,2004
YILMAZ, YFŞİL DUYMUŞ DİNÇKAL YANIK OĞLU
13.
Yeşi
l Duymuş Z, Denizoglu S. Farklı polimertzasyon yöntemleri ile polimerice edilen değişik akrilik materyallerinin kırılma mukavemetlerinin incelenmesi (The investigation on the stansverse strength ol various acrylic resins materials polymerized with different polimcrtzatioti processes). Atatürk Univ. Diş Hek Fak Dcrg2001; II: 25 30.
14. Phillips RW. SkinnerD s science of dental materials-, 7 th.Fid. W.R. Saunders Co,Philadephia, 1973: p. 57-204.
15. Sweeney WT, Acrylic resin in prosthetic dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1958: 593 602.
16. O'Toole TJ, Furnish GM, Von Fraunhofer ,1A. Linear distortion of acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 53-55.
17. Wtielfel JB, Paffenbarger GC, Sweeney WT. Dimensional changes occuring in dentures during processing. J Am Dent Assoc 196.1; 61: 421-425.
18. Hidcey JC, Zarb GA. Bouchcrîs Prosthodonlic treatment for edentulous patients. 8 th. Ed. CV Mosby Co^St. Louis, 1980: p-90-91.
19. Rudd KD. Processing complete dentures. Dent Clin North Am 19%; 40: 121-149.
20 Johnson DL, duneanson JR. The plastic postpalatal denture scal.Quinlcs Intern. I9S7;1S: 457-62.
21. McCartney JW. Flange adaptation discrepancy, palatal base distortion, and induced malocclusion caused by processing acrylic resin maxillary complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52: 545-553.
22, Harvey WI., Harvey BV. Dimensional changes at the posterior border of baseplates made from a visible light- activated composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62:184-189.
24. Wolfaardl J, CIeatonJones P, Fatti P. The influence of processing variables on dimensional changes of heat-cured poly (methyl mclhacrylate). J Prosthet Uenl 1986; 55: .518-525,
25. Sykora O, Sutow Fl. Posterior palatal seal adaptation : influence of processing technique, palate shape and immersion. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20( 1); 19-31,
26. Morrow RM, Rudd KD, Kissmann HF. Dental laboratory procedure. Vol l.St Louis: CV Mosby Co, 1980: p. 85.
27. Firtcll DN, Green AJ, El ahi JM. Posterior peripheral seal distortion related to processing temperature, J Prosthet Dent 1981; 45: 598 601.
28. Aladağ Lİ, Yanıkoğlu N. İkinci kez polimerize edilen dörl tip akrilik rezinin boyutsal değişi m in in incelenmesi (An evaluation of dimensional change of double processing of four type acrylic resin»). Alatiirk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 1996; 6: 59-64.
29. Consani RLX, Doınitti SS, Consani S. HffecL of a new tension system, used in acrylic resin flas-ktng, on the dimensional stability of denLuTt bases. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:285-289.
30. I.eacher SK, Lautenschlagcr EP. Processing changes in maxillary complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 19S4;52(1); 20-24.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com