You are here

FARKLI DAMAK ŞEKİLLERİNDE TAKVİYE EDİLEN VE EDİLMEYEN KAİDE PLAKLARININ KIRILMA KUVVETLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

AN INVESTIGATION OF FRACTURE LOADS OF ACRYLIC BASE PLATES REINFORCED, NON-REINFORCED AND PREPARED IN DIFFERENT PALATAL SHAPES

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of rennforced acryiic denture base, using three different palatal shapes. Maxiilary denture bases having three types of palatal vault shapes -shallow, medium and deep- were used in this study. The reinforced materials used were the round metal wire-diametered in 1.50 mm, semi-rounded metal wire -thickened 1.50x0.75 mm- and the stainless steel mesh (70mmx2.5mmx2.5mm). A total of 132 acryiic denture bases were prepared with the conventional method from heat-cured acrylic resin (Meiodent; Heraeus Kulzer Ltd). They were stored in distilled water at 37±10C for 48 hours before testing. After storage, the fracture force was measured by using Haunsfield pull-compress machine at a cross-head speed of 5 mm/min. Standard deviations and means were calculated. Univariate variance analysis was used for statistical assessment. Duncan multiple-comparison test was applied. In this study, fracture resistances of denture bases in shallow shaped (79.3 N) were found lower than those of the medium (86.8 N) and deep shaped ones (81.2 N). It was determined that the type of the palatal shapes and reinforcement would significantly affect fracture resistance.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma, metal He güçlendirilmiş ve güçlendirilmemiş olarak farklı damak şekline sahip modellerde hazırlanan akriiik kaide plaklarının kırılma kuvvet/erini ince/emek amacı ile yapıldı. Üç farkı damak şekinne sahip modeller (sığ, orta ve derin) çalışmada kul/anıldı. Her bir damak şeklinden 16 tane olmak üzere, toplam 48 model sert alçıdan elde edildi. 2.80 mm kalınıığında mum alçı modeller üzerine yerleştirildi. Modeller muflaya alındıktan sonra kuvvetlendirilmiş veya kuvvetlendirilmemiş o/arak üreticinin önerisi doğruttusunda hazrraanan akriiik reznn l/e akr/lik kaide plağına dönüştürüldü. Hounsfield çekme-sıkıştrrma cihazında 5 mm/min başhk hızı ile kırı/ma dayanıklılıkları tespit edildi. İstatistiksel değerlendirme için varyans anaiizi kul/anıldı. Ortalama ve standart sapmalar hesap/andı. Duncan çoklu karşı/aştırma testi uygu/andı. Kırı/ma mukavemetinin; düz damaklarda (82.31 N), orta (87.75 N) ve dernn oaanaardan (88.13N) daha düşük olduğu görüldü. Damak deriniiği ve takviyenin önemli ölçüde kırı/ma kuvvetini etkilediği istatistiksel o/arak saptandı.
18-24

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Woeffel JB, Paffenbarger GC, Sweeney WT. Some physical properties of organic denture base mareraals. J Am Dent Assoc 1963; 67: 499-504.
2. Bey/i MS, von Fraunhofer J A. An anaysis of causes of
fracture of acryiic resin dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1981; 46:238-40.
3. Farmer JB. Preventive prosthodontics: Maxillary denture fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50:172-5.
4. Nimmo A, Kratochvil FJ. Preventing fractures of maxillary overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 773-5.
5. Ruffnni AR. Effect of steel strengtheners on fracture
resistance of the acrylic resin complete denture base. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 54:75-80.
6. Yazdanie N, Mahood M. Carbon fiber acryiic resin
composite: An investigation of transvers strength. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 54:543-7.7. Berry HH, Funk OJ. Vttaliium strengthener to prevent
lower denture breakage. J Prosthet Dent 1971; 26: 532-5.
8. Combe EC. Notes on Dental Materials, 4 th ed.
Churchill Livingstone, Ednnburg, London, 1975:213.
9. Johnston EP, Nichols JI, Smith DE. Flexure fatigue of
10 commonly used denture base resins. J Prosthet Dent 1981; 46: 478-83.
10. Morris JC, Khan Z, von Fraunhofer JA. Palatal shape and the flexural strenght of maxiilary denture bases. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 670-3.
11. Phillips RW. Skinner's Science of Dental Materials, 7th ed., WB. Saunders Co, Philadelphia, 1973:178¬97.
12. Schneider RL. Diagnosing functional complete denture fractures. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 54: 809¬14.
13. Boucher CO, Hickey JC, and Zarb G.A. Prosthodontic Treatment for Edentulous Patients, 7th ed. The Cv Mosby Co., Sant Louis, 1975:116.
14. Dixon DL, Breeding LC. The transverse strengths of three denture base resins reinforced with polyethylene fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 417¬9.
15. Bowman AJ, Man/ey TR. The etimnnation of breakages in upper dentures by reinforcement with carbon fibre. Br Dent J1984; 156:87-9.
16. John J, Gangadhar SA, Shah I. Flexural strength of heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture resin reinforced with glass, aramid, or nylon fibers. J Prosthet Dent2001; 86: 424-7.
17. Kanie T, Fuji K, Arikawa H, Inoue K. Flexural properties and impact strength of denture base polymer reinforced with woven glass fibers. Dental Materials 2000; 16:150-58.
18. Kim SH, Watts DC. The effect of reinforcement with woven E-glass fibers on the impact strength of complete dentures fabricated with high-impact acryiic resin. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91:274-80.
19. Valitttu PK. Comparison of the nn vitro fatigue resistance of an acryiic resin removable partial denture reinforced with continuous glass fibers or metal wrres. J Prosthodont 1996; 5:115-21.
20. Teraoka F, Nakagawa M, Takahashi J. Adaptation of acryiic dentures reinforced with metal wire. J Oral Rehabil2001; 28:937-42.
21. Gutteridge DL. The effect of including ultra-high-modulus polyethlyene fiber on the impact strength of acryiic resin. Br Dent J1988; 164:177-80.
22. Ladzzesky NH, Chow TW, Cheng YY. Denture base reinforcement using woven polyethylene fiber. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7:307-14.
23. Valitttu PK, Lass/a VP. Effect of metal strengthener's surface roughness on fracture resistance of acryiic denture base material. J Oral Rehabil 1992; 19: 385-91.
24. Naegei DG, Duke ES, Schwartz R, Norinng BK. Adhesive bonding of composites to a casting alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 60:279-83.
25. Valitttu PK. Dimensional accuracy and stabiitty of polymethyl methacrylate reinforced with metal wire or with continuous glass fiber. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75: 617-21.
26. Jagger DC, Harrison A, Jandt KD. Review. The reinforcement of dentures. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 185-94.
27. Valitttu PK. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81:318-26.
28. Valitttu PK. Some aspects of the tensile strength of unidirectional glass fiber-polymethyl methacrylate composite used in dentures. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25:100-5.
29. Uzun G, Hersek N, Tincer T. Effect of five woven fiber reinforcements on the impact and transverse strength of a denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 616-20.
30. Smith DC. Acrylic denture. Mechanical evaluation; mid-fine fracture. Br Dent J1961; 110:257-67.
31. Kanie T, Arikawa H, Fuji K, Ban S. Flexural properties of denture base polymers reinforced with a glass cloth-urethane polymer composite. Dental Materials 2004; 20:709-16.
32. Darber UR, Huggett R, Harrison A. Denture fracture: a survey. Brit Dent J1994; 176:342-5.33. Carol CE, von Fraunhofer JA. Wire reinforcement of acrylic resin prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52: 639-41.
34. Valitttu PK. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven g/ass fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:318-26.
35.
Karaağaçtıoğlu L, Türköz Y, Biirr ÖG. Farktı üst damak yap/arında takviyelendirilmiş ve takviyelendirilmemiş akril kaide plak/arının kırılma kuvvetlerinin incelenmesi (The evaluation of the fracture loads of reinforced denture bases on three different pa/atal shapes). Ank Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 1988;15:249-54.
36. Yeşil Z. Farkı damak şekillerinde akril kaide p/aklarının kırı/ma kuvvetlerinin incelenmesi (An investigation about fracture loads of denture bases in different pa/a tat shapes). Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 1996; 6: 73-6.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com