You are here

Home » Content

FARKLI DAMAK ŞEKİLLERİNDE AKRÎL KAİDE PLAKLARININ KIRILMA KUVVETLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

AN INVESTIGATION ABOUT FRACTURE LOADS OF DENTURE BASES fN DIFFERENT PALATAL SHAPES

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1996

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study includes the patients with shallow, medium^nd deep patates. The study casts were duplicated from the casts of the patients used for treatment. Denture bases in different thickness were prepared on the study models, and fracture loads of the bases were coniparcu. It has been concluded that the fracture loads of the denture bases prepared on the casts with shallow palate were lower than those of the other two.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırmada; sığ , orta ve derin oimak üzere üç farkh damak şekli esas alınmış, bunların duplikatları çıkarılarak çalışma modelleri elde edilmiştir. Bu modeller üzerinde değişik kalınlıkta kaide pîaklan hazırlanmış ve bunların kırılma kuvvetleri karşılaştın! m ıştır. Sığ damaklı modellerde hazırlanan kaide plaklarının kırılma kuvvetlerinin diğerlerinden daha düşük olduğu tesbit edilmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-farkli-damak-sekillerinde-akril-kaide-plaklarinin-kirilma-kuvvetlerinin-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 1
73-76
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1- Belfiglio EJ.
Usin
g metal bases iti making complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58(3):314-7.
2- Beyli MS, Von Fraunhofcr JA. An analysis of causes of fracture of acrylic resin dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1981 ;46(3): 238-40.
3- Çalıkkocaoğlu S. Tam Protezler. Cilt II, İstanbul, i 988:92-5
4- Farmer JB. Preventive prosthodontics: Maxillary denture fracture. J Prosthet Dent 19S3;50 (2): 172-5.
5- Hargreaves AS. The prevalence of fractured dentures. A survey, Br Dent Jour 1969;20:451-55.
6- Johnston EP, Nicholls JT, Smith DE. Flexure fatique of 10 commonly used denture base resins. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46(5}:478-83.
7-
Karaağaçt
ı oğlu Lv Türköz Yv Bîlir ÖG. Farklı üst damak yapriannda takviycîendirilmiş ve takviyelendirilmemiş akril kaide plaklarının kırılma kuvvetlerinin incelenmesi. Ank Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg İ988; 15 (3J:249-54.
8- Morris JC,
Kha
n Z, Von Fratınhofer JA. Palatal shape and the flexural strenght of maxillary denture bases. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53(5):670-73.
9- Nimmq A, Kratoclivtl FX Preventing fractures of maxillary ov erden tures. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55 (6):773-75.
10- Peyton FA, Anthony DH. Evaluation of dentures processed by different technique. J Prosthet Dent 1963;13(2):269-72.
75
Atatürk Üniv .Diş Hek.Fak.Derg. YEŞİI. Cilt:6 Says: t Sayfa:73-76 1996
11- PhilIips
K.W
. Skinner's Science of Denial Materials, Sevent ed, WB. Saunders Cp, Philadelphia, 1973:!78-97.
12- RuiTino AR.
Effec
t of steel strengtheners or fracture resistance of the acrylic resin complete denture base. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54< 1):75-S0.
13 Schneider RL- Diagnosing functional complete denture fractures. J Prosthet Dent ]985;54(6):809-14.
14- Smith DC. The fatique fracture of acrylic dentures. Br Dent Jour 1961 ;110:251.
15- Smith DC. The acrylic denture-mechanical evaluation of mid-line fracture. Br Dent Jour 1961; 110:257.
16- Yazdanic N, Mahood ML Carbon fiber acrylic resin composite: An investigation of transvers strength. J Prosthet Dent !985;54<4):543-7.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com