You are here

Home » Content

ÜST BUKKAL FRENULUMLAR ARASI MESAFE İLE MAKSİLLER ANTERİOR DİŞLER ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN İNCELENMESİ

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN UPPER BUCCAL FRENULA AND MAXILLARY ANTERIOR TEETH

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
One of the dffficutt aspects of complete denture prosthodontics is the selection of maxillary anterior teeth. Several anatomical landmarks are used currently, when selecting artfficial teeth for edentulous patients. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a relationship between two maxillary buccal frenulum and the total mesiodistal distance of six maxillary anterior teeth. 50 impressions were taken from the subjects by using stock trays and irreversible hydrocolloid impression material and casts were formed. The individuals were the age of between 19-22. The subjects were standardized in terms of dental status e.g. there was no tooth loss and no anterior restorations on the upper jaws. The total mesiodistal widths of six upper anterior teeth and then the distances between the most anterior border of two buccal frenula and the most distal of canines were measured with digital caiiper. The results were analyzed by using correlation and regression tests. According to the results of analyses there is a correlation between the buccal frenula and the anterior teeth statisticaly. However, maxi/aary buccal frenula should not be taken a reference points on its own to select the maxillary anterior teeth.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Tam protezlerle ilgili karşı/aşılan güçüüklerden brri maksiler anterior dişlerin seçimidir. Tam dişsiz hastalar için diş seçimi yapılırken, günümüzde çok sayıda anatomik yapı rehber oaarak kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı üst iki bukkal frenulumla üst attı anterior diş arasında brr ilişki olup olmadığını araştırmaktır. irreversible hidrokolloid ölçü maddesi ve fabrikasyon kaşıklar kullanılarak 50 adet ölçü aiınarak model hazrhandı. Ölçüsü alınan ve yaşları 19-22 arasında olan bireylerde üst çenede diş kaybı olmamasına ve herhangi brr restorasyon bulunmamasına dikkat edlldi. Modeller üzerinde üst altı dişin mesiodistal genişlikleri ve kaninlerin en distal noktaları lle bukkal frenulumların anterior sınırı arasındaki mesafe dijital kumpas kul/anılarak ölçüldü. Sonuçlar korelasyon ve regresyon istatistik testleri ile değerlendirildi. istatistiksel analiz sonuçlarına göre bukkal frenulumlarla anterior dişler arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu görüldü. Bunun/a birlikte bukkal frenu/um/ar üst anterior diş/erin seçiminde tek başına rehber olarak kul/anılmamalıdır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ust-bukkal-frenulumlar-arasi-mesafe-ile-maksiller-anterior-disler-arasindaki-iliskinin-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 3
14-18
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Selen PN, Jagger DC, Harrison A. Computer-generated study of the correlation between tooth, face, arch forms, and palatal contour. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80:163-168.
2. Lang BR, Razzoog ME. A practical approach to restoring occlusion for edentulous patients. Part I: Guiding principles for tooth selection. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:455-458.
3. Woeffel JB, Winter CM, Igarashi T. Five-year cephalometric study of mandibular ridge resorbtion with different posterior occlusal forms. Part I: Denture construction and initial comparasion. J Prosthet Dent 1976; 36:602-623.
4. Ortman HR. Complete denture occlusion. Dent Cin North Am 1977; 21:299-320.
5. Smith BJ. The value of the nose width as an esthetic guide in prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1975; 34:562-573.
6. Al Wazzan KA. The relationship between nntercanthal dimension and the widths of maxillary anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86(6):608-12.
Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
Cilt: 16, Sayı: 3, Yıl: 2006, Sayfa: 14-18
7. Scandrett FR, Kerber PE, Umrggar ZR. A c/inical evaluation of techniques to determine the combined width of the maxii/ary anterior teeth and the maxWary central incisor. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48:15-22.
8. Hickey JC, Zarb GA. Boucher's Prosthodontcc treatment for edentulous patients. 8th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby 1980:321-28.
9. Latta GH Jr, Weaver JR, Conknn JE. The relationship between the width of the mouth, interalar width, bizygomatic width, and interpupiilary distance in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65:250-4.
10. Selen PN, Jagger DC, Harrison A. Methods used to select artificial anterior teeth for the edentulous patient: a historical overview. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12:51-58.
11. Nelson AAA. The esthetic triangle in the arrangement of teeth: face form, tooth form and alignment form, harmonious or grostesque. National Dent Assoc J1922; 9:392-401.
12. French FA. Selection and arrangement of the anterior teeth in prosthetic dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1951; 1:587-593.
13. Krajicek D. Guides for natural facial appearance as related to complete denture construction. J Prosthet Dent 1969; 21:654-662.
14. Lowery PC. Art and esthetics as appiied to prosthetics. Dental Cosmos 1921; 63:1223-1226.
15. Boucher CO. Swensons complete dentures. 6th ed. St Louis: CV Mosby; 1970:155-194.
16. Latta GH Jr, Weaver JR, Conknn JE. The relationship between the width of the mouth, interalar width, bizygomatic width, and interpupiilary distance in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65:250-4.
17. Scandrett FR, Kerber PE, Umrggar ZR. A ciinical evaluation of techniques to determine the combined width of the maxii/ary anterior teeth and the maxWary central incisor. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48:15-22.
18. Hasanreisoglu U, Berksun S, Aras K, Arslan I. An analysis of maxilary anterior teeth: facaal and dental proportions. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94:530¬538.
GÜLDAĞ, ŞENTUT, BÜYÜKKAPLAN
19. LaVere AM, Marcroft KR, Smtth RC, Sarka RJ. Denture tooth selection: an anayysis of the natural maxilary central incisor compared to the length and width of the face: Part I. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67:661-663.
20. Mavroskoufs F, Rttchie GM. The face-form as a gudde for the selection of maxilary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 43(5)501-505.
21. Johnson DL, Stratton RJ. Fundamentals of Removable Prosthodontics. Chicago: Quintessence Pubishnng Co, 1980;387-406.
22. Çaiıkkocaoğlu S. Tam Protezeer. Citt 2. 3. Bask, İstanbul 1998; 399-414.
23. Mavroskoufs F, Rttchie GM. Variation in size and form between left and right maxilary incisor teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 43:254-57.
24. Grove HF, Christensen LV. Relationship of the maxilary canines to the incisive papiila. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61:51-53.
25. Mersel A, Ehrlich J. Connection between incisive papila, central incisor and rugae cannna. Quintessence Int Dent Dig 1981; 12:1327-9.
26. LaVere AM, Marcroft KR, Smtth RC, Sarka RJ. Denture tooth selection: an anayysis of the natural maxilary central incisor compared to the length and width of the face: Part I. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67:661-3.
27. Lavele CL. Relationship between tooth and skull size. J Dent Res. 1974; 53(5):1301.
28. Hoffman W Jr, Bomberg TJ, Hatch RA. Interaaar width as a guide in denture tooth selection. J Prosthet Dent. 1986; 55:219-21.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com