You are here

KRANYO-FASİYAL YAPILARDAKİ TRANSVERS ve VERTIKAL BUYUME DEĞİŞİKLİKLERİNİN LONGİTUDİNAL OLARAK İNCELENMESİ

A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF TRANSVERSE AND VERTICAL GROWTH CHANGES IN THE CRANIOFACIAL STRUCTURES

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, 68 postero-anterior cephalomet-ric head fiEms from 16 male and 18 female subjects were used to determine the transverse and vertical growth changes in the craniofacial structures. The subjects with class I occlusion, a balanced skeletal profite, normal growth and development, and no orthodontic treatment history were included to the investigation. The cephalometric measurements were done on the first and the second films of each subjects, which were taken about 5-year-intervals. Since significant sex differences were observed in most of the first measurements, the growth changes of both sexes were analized separately. The significance levels of the changes resulting from growth and development were determined by paired t test. As a conclusion, it has been observed that the growth changes of both sexes were statistically significant in the majority of the measurements during the observation period.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada. 16 erkek IS kız toplam 34 bireyin postero-anterior sefalometrik filmleri üzerimle knınyo-fasiyal yapıların transvers ve vırtlkal yöndeki büyüme değişiklikleri longitudinal olarak incelendi. Sınıf l dişsel oklüzyonlu, dengeli bir iskeletsrt yüz profiline sahip, normal büyüme ve gelişim gösteren ve herhangi bir ortodontik tedavi görmemiş bireyler anıştırma kapsamına alindi. Yaklaşık 5 yıllık bir süre boyunca takip edilen herbir bireyden, inceleme periyodu başında ve sonunda olmak üzere iki adet film alimli- İnceleme periyodu başında, birçok ölçümde önemli düzeyde cinsiyet farklılığı belirlendiğinden her iki cins ayrı ayrı değerlendirildi, inceleme periyodu boyunca büyüme ve gelişimin etkisi ile oluşan değişimlerin önem düzeyleri "Eşleştirilmiş t Testi" uygulanmak suretiyle araştırıldı. Bu analiz sonucunda, her iki cinste de incelenen ölçümlerin büyük çoğunluğunda önemli düzeyde büyüme değişikliği belirlendi.
30-43

REFERENCES

References: 

1.
Gülyur
t M. Erzurum yöresi çocuklarında Ricketts'in frontal sefalometrik ölçümleri. Türk Ortodonti Derg 1989; 2: 144-51.
2. Athanasiou A, Droschl H, Bosch C. Data and patterns of transvers dentofacial structure of 6-tol5-year-oid children: A Posteroanterior cep-hatometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop T992, 101:465-71.
3. Snodell SF, Nanda RS. Currier GF. A longitudinal cephalometric study of transverse and vertical craniofacial growth. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993; 104: 471-83.
42
4. Letzer GM, Kronman JH. A posteroante-rior cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial asymmetry. Angle Orthod 1967; 37: 205-11.
5. Vig PS, Hewitt AB, Asymmetry of the human facial skeleton. Angle Orthod 1978; 48: 125-9.
6. Chebib FS, Chamma AM. Indices of craniofacial asymmetry. Angle Orthod 1981; 51:214-26.
7. Grayson 3H, McCarthy JG, Bookstein F. Analysis of craniofacial asymmetry by multiplane cephalometry. Am J Orthod 1983; 84: 217¬24.
8. Mongini F, Schmid W. Treatment of mandibular asymmetries during growth. A longitudinal study. Eur J Orthod 1987; 9: 51-67.
9. Schmid W, Mongini F, Felisio A, A computer-based assessment of structural and displacement asymmetries of the mandibie. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991; 100: 19-34.
10. Ricketts RM. Cephalometric synthesis. An exercise in stating objectives and planning treatment with tracings of the head roentgenogram. Am J Orthod 1960; 46: 647-73.
11. Ricketts RM. Cephalometric analysis and synthesis. Angle Orthod 1961; 31: 141-56.
12. Solow B. The pattern of craniofacial associations. Acta Odont Scand 1966; 24: 21-47.
13. Wei SHY. Craniofacial width dimensions. Angle Orthod 1970: ^0: 141-7
14. Ricketts RM. Bench RW, Hıfgers JJ Schuihof R. An Overview of computerized cep halometrics. Am J Onhod 1972, 61: 1-28.
15. Ricketts RM. New findings and concepts emerging form the clinical use of the computer. Trans Eur Orthod Sec 1973; 507-15,
16. Gugino OF, An orthodontic philosophy Denver, Colorado: Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, 1974; 57-62.
17. Broadbent BH Sr, Broadhent BH Jr. Golden WH. Bolton standars of dentofacial development and growth . St Louis: CV Mosby,
1975
18. Ricketts RM, Roth RH, Chaconas SJ, Schulof RJ. Engel GA. Orthodontic diagnosis and planning: their roles in preventive and rehabilitative dentistry. Vol 1, Denver, Colorado: Rock Mountain Data Systems, 1982: 15-147.
19. Fredie H, Figueroa AA, Naegela ML, Gould HJ, Kay CN, Aduss H. Craniofacial growth data for cleft lip patients infancy to 6 years of age: Potential applicaitions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1986; 90: 388-409.
20. Woods GA. Changes in width dimensions between certain teeth and facial points during human growth. Am J Orthod 1950; 36: 676¬700,
21. Siliman JH. Dimensional changes of the dental arch: longitudinal study from birth to 25 years. Am J Orthod 1964; 50: 824-42.
22. Goldsman S. The variations in skeletal and denture patterns in excellent adult facial types. Angle Orthod 1959; 29: 63-92.
23. Altemus LA. Comparison of cephalofa-cial relationships. Angle Orthod 1960; 30: 223,40.
24. Humerfelt A. A roentgenograph^ cephalometric investigation of Norwegian children with normal occlusion. Scand J Dent Res 1970; 78:117-43.
25. Kowalski CJ, Nasjleti CE, Walker GF. Dentofacial variations within and between four groups of adult American males. Angle Orthod 1975,45:146-51.
26
Ceyla
n t, Gazileri! Ü. Erzurum yöresi çocijkiarındaki Steiner, Downs ve Tweed ölçümlerinin diğer bazı gruplarla Karşılaştırılması. Ankara Univ. Dişhek Fak Derg. 1992; 19: 143-52.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com