You are here

Home » Content

ALT ÇENE BÜYÜMESİNİN BİR GÖSTERGESİ OLARAK SİMFİZ VE BİRİNCİ SERVİKAL VERTEBRANIN MORFOLOJİSİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

ASSESMENT O F MORPHOLOGIES OF THE SYMPHYSIS AND THE FIRST CERVICAL VERTEBRA AS AN INDICATOR OF MANDIBULAR GROWTH

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1995

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In the present study, the relationships between the morphologies of symphysis and the first cervical vertebra and the longitudinal growth changes of mandible have been investigated On the lateral cephalomelric head films of 30 subjects, 15 male and 15 female. The morphologies of symphysis and the first cervical vertebra was determined On the first ftlms, while the growth changes of mandible was measured by superimposing the First and the second cephalometric film tracings, which were taken at intervals of five years. The means and standard deviations of the ages of male and female subjects were 10.6±0.4 years and 10.5±0.5 years respectively, at the beginning of the study. The measurements of male and female groups were analysed separately because of - the significant gender differences found by Student's t test. It has been found by correlation and multiple regression analyses that the morphologies of symphysis and the first cervical vertebra are not reliable criteria in prediction of mandibular growth changes.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada, 15 kız, 15 erkek toplam 30 bireyin lateral sefalometrik filmleri üzerinde simfiz ve birinci servikal vertebranın morfolojisi ile longitudinal olarak belirlenen alî çene büyümesi arasındaki ilişkiler incelenmiştir. Simfiz ve birinci servikal vertebranın morfolojisi araştırma başında alınan filmler üzerinde değerlendirilirken, ali çenenin büyüme yönü herbir bireyden yaklaşık 5 yıllık ara ile alman filmlerin çaktırılması ile belirlenmiştir. Araştırma başında kızlann yaş ortalaması 10.5±0.5 yıl iken, erkeklerin yaş ortalaması i0,6± 0.4yı]'dır. Uygulanan Student's t testi sonucunda bir çok ölçümde önemli cinsiyet farklılığı bulunduğu için her iki cins ayrı ayn değerlendirilmiştir. Uygulanan korelasyon ve çoklu regresyon analizleri sokucunda simfiz ve birinci servikal vertebranın morfolojisinin alt çenenin büyüme değişikliklerinin tahmininde yeterince güvenilir morfolojik kriterEer olmadıkları belirlenmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-alt-cene-buyumesinin-bir-gostergesi-olarak-simfiz-birinci-servikal-vertebranin-morfolojisinin-degerlendirilmesi.pdf
  • 2
23-30
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Solow B, Siersbaek-Nielsen S. Cervical and cranio-cervical posture as predictors of craniofacial growth. Arn J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 101: 449-58,
2. Lee RS, Daniel FJ, Swartz M, Baumrind S.Kom EL. Assessment of a method for the prediction of mandibular rotation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987; 91: 395^102.
3. Hixon EM. Prediction of facial growth. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1968; 44: 127-39.
4. Johnston LE. A statistical evaluation of cephalometric prediction. Angle Orthod 1968; 38: 284-304.
5. Mills JRE. Principles and practice of orthodontics, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1982.
(Alınmıştır
Skielle
r V,Björk A, Linde-Hansen T8).
6. Björk A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod 1969; 55: 585-99.
7. Durlak C, Witt E. Der stellenwert der symphyse filr die wachstumsprognose des unteitaefers. Fortschr Kieferor-thopl980;41: 18-30.
8. Skieller V, Björk A, Linde-Hansen T. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation evaluated from a longitudinal implant sample. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 359-70:
9. Singer CP, Mamandras AH, Hunter WS. The depth of the mandibular antegonial notch as an indicator of mandibular growth potential. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987; 91: 117-24.
10. Aki T, Nanda RS, Currier GF, Nanda SK. Assessment of symphysis morphology as a predictor of the direction of mandibular growth .A m J Orthod Dentofac Or-thopl994; 106: 60-9.
1L Lavergne JM. Morpho genetic classification of malocclusion as a basis for growth prediction and treatment planning. Br J Orthod 1982; 9: 132-45.
12. Petrovich AG, Lavergne JM, Stuttmann JJ- Tissue-level growth and responsiveness potential: Growth rotation and treatment decision. In: Vig PS, Ribbens KA, eds. Science and clinical judgement in orthodontics. Monograph No, 19 Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 1986: 181-223.
(Almirngtin Solow B, Siersbask -Nielsen S').
13. Jarabak JR. Fızzell JA. Technique and treatment with the light*wire edgewise appliances. St.Louis: CV Mos-by; 1972: 137-58,
14. Ricketts RM. A principle of arcial growth of the mandible. Angle Orthod 1972; 42: 368-86.
15. Lundslrom A, Wbodside DG, Individual variation in growth directions expressed at the chin and the midface. EurJOrthodl980;2: 65-79.
29
Atatürk Üniv,Diş Hek.Fak,Derg. Cilt:5 Sayı:2 Sayfa; 23-30 1995
CEYLAN
16. Björk A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res 1963; 42: 400-11.
17. Sicher H. Oral Anatomy, Fourth ed., St.Louis : CV Mosby, 1965.
18. Moss ML. The primary rale of functional matrices in facial growth. Am J Orthod 1969; 55: 566-77.
19 Ricketts RM. Cephalomctnc synthesis. Am J Orthod 1960; 46: 647-73.
20. Björk A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible, A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod 1983; 5:1-46.
21. Horowitz SL, Thompson RH Jr. Variation of the craniofacial skeleton in pastadolescent males and females. Angle Orthod 1964; 34: 97-102.
22. Haskell BS. The human chin and its relationship to mandibular morphology. Angle Orthod 1979; 49: 153-66,
23. Baumrind S, Korn EL, Isaacson RJ, West EE, Molth-en R. Superimpositiona! assessment of treatment-associated changes in the temporomandibular joint and the mandibular symphysis. Am J Orthod 1983; 84: 443-65.
24. Berksii B.
Farkl
ı yüz-iskelet yapısına sahip bireylerde mandibuler simfizin alan ve boyutlarının incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, Ankara, 1987.
25.
Erde
m A. Ortodontik tedavi sonucu alt keser ve simfiz konumunun incelenmesi. Ege Univ Dişhek Fak Derg 1991; 12: 19-23¬26, Huggare J. The first cervical vertebra as an indicator
of mandibular growth. Eur J Orthod 1989:11:10-6.
27. Huggare J, Cooke MS, Head posture and cervicover-tebral anatomy as mandibular growth predictors. Eur J Orthod 1994; 16: 175-80.
28. Treuenfels Hv. Die relation der atlasposition bci prognather und progener kieferanomalie. Fortschr Kieferor-thop 1981; 42:482-91.
29. Huggare J, Kylamarkuia S- Morphology of the first cervical vertebra in children with enlarged adenoids. Eur J Orthod 1985; 7: 93-6.
30. Kylamarkula S .Huggare J. Head posture and the morphology of the first cervical vertebra. Eur J Orthod 1985;7:151-6.
31.
Ceyla
n İ. Farklı iskelet yapılarında dik yön kranyo-fasiyai morfoloji, hyoid kemiğinin konumu ve birinci ser vikal vertebranın morfolojisinin incelenmesi. Türk Ortodonti Dergi 995; 8: 20-9.
32. Sehudy FF. The rotation of the mandible resulting from growth: its implications in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1965; 35: 36-50.
33. Balbach DR. The cephalometric relationship between the morphology of the mandible and its future occlusal position. Angle Orthod 1969; 39: 29-41.
34. Wenzel R. Die biBhebung : behandlungserfolg und-miBerfolg unter beurteilung von femrontgenseitbildern. Fortschr Kieferortbop 1976; 37: 302-9.
35. Bishara S, Augspurger E. The role of mandibular plane inclination in orthodontic diagnosis. Angle Orthod 1975; 45: 273-81,
36. Farkas LG, Katie Ml, Hreczko TA, Dcutsch C, Mun-ro IR. Anthropometric proportions in the upper lip-lower Sip-chin area of the lower face in young white adults. Am J Orthod 1984; 85: 52-9.
37. Baumrind S, Kom EL, West EE. Prediction oi mandibular rotation: An empirical test of clinician performance. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 371-85.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com