You are here

Home » Content

MUM MODELİN MANŞETE YERLEŞTİRİLME ŞEKLİNİN MARJİNAL ADAPTASYONA ETKİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ

THE EFFECT OF PLACEMENT POSITIONING OF WAX PATTERN IN CASTING METAL RING ON THE MARGINAL ADAPTATION

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1996

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In the present study, the effects of two different positioning of" wa\ patterns in metal rings on marginal adaptation were investigated. Thirty wax bridge patterns were prepared on a metal mould, and they were invested to that the long axes half of the wax pattens were parallel to the long axes of the rings and those of others perpendicular. The castings were obtained by setting, hygroscopic, and termal expansion techniques. The castings were adapted to metal mould, and their photographs were taken by means of light microscope. The marginal gap of each cast was measured on its photograph. As a conclusion, it has been determined that the placement position of wax pattern has no effect on the marginal adaptation of the cast.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırmada mum modelin döküm manşetine yerleştirilme şeklinin marjinal adaptasyona etkisi incelenmiştir. Metalden yapılmış modeller üzerinde hazırlanmış mum köpril örnekleri manşet aksına paralel ve dik pozisyonda olmak üzere revetmanlanmış; sertleşme, higroskopik ve termal genleşme yöntemleri uygulanarak dökümler elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen döküm örnekler modele adapte edildikten sonra ışık mikroskobu altında marjinal bölgenin, fotoğrafları çekilerek, fotoğraflar üzerinde marjinal aralık ölçümleri yapılmıştır. İstatistiksel analizler sonunda mum modelin manşete yerleştirilme şeklinin marjinal adaptasyona etkisinin olmadığı belirlenmiştir,
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-mum-modelin-mansete-yerlestirilme-seklinin-marjinal-adaptasyona-etkisinin-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 1
27-30
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1, Belser UC, Mac Entee MI, Richter WA. Fit of three porcelain- fused-to - metal marginal designs itıvivo: A scanning electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent 19S5;53 (1): 24-9.
2. Craig RG. Restorative Denial Materials. Sixt ed. St I^uis: CV Mosby, 1989; 359-73,457-79.
3, Davis DR. Limiting wax pattern distortion caused by setting expansion. J Prosthet Dent E987; 58 (2): 229-34.
4. Dedmond HW. The relationship between open margins and margin designs on full cast crowns made by commercial dental laboratories. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53 (4): 463-6.
29
Atatürk Üniv.Diş Hek.Fak.Dcrg. Cilt:6 Sayı:l Sayfa: 27-30 1996
AÇIKGÖZ, YEŞİL
5. Donovan TE, White LE. Evaluation of an improved centrifugal casting machine. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53 (5): 609-12.
6. Henning G. The casting of precious metal alloys in dentistry. British Dent Jour 1972; 133 (]0):428-35.
7. Hollenbaek GM. Physical properties of casting investments. In: Hollenbaek GM- Ed. Science and technic of the cast restoration. St Louis: CV Mosby Company, 1964: 135-55.
8. Jendresen MD, Stocks CL. Investing procedures. In: Eissman HF, Rudd KD, Morrow RM. Dental Laboratory Procedures: Fixed Partial Dentures. St Louis: CV Mosby, 1980: 150-58.
9. Johnston JF, Phillips RW, Dykema RW. Modern Practice in Crown and Bridge Prosthodontics 3 ed, Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1971: 234-45,2499-79.
JO, Kelly JR, Rose TC. Non precious alloys for use in fixed prosthodontics: A literature reviev. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49 (3); 363-70.
11. Klotzer W. Problem Bölgesi: Kuron kenarı, Marmara ÜnivDisHek Fak Derg 1985; I (1): 21-31.
12. Mackert PJ, Moffa JP. A castability test for dental alloys. J Dent Res 1975; 54:355.
13. Mahler DB. Ady AB. The influence of various factors on the effective setting expansion of casting investments. J Prosthet Dent 1963; 13: 365-73.
14. Mahler DB. Controlled hygroscopic expansion of the investing material In: Hollenbaek GM. Ed, Science and technic of the cast restoration. St Louis: CV Mosby Company, 1964: 156-70.
15. Marsav FA, De Rijk WG, Hestay RA, eı al. Internal volumetric expansion of casting investment. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52 {2): 361-6.
16. Mondelli J, Ishikiriama A, Junior JG. Marginal microleakage in cemented complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 40 (6): 632-6.
17. Morey EF. Dimensional accuracy of small gold alloy castings, Part 3. Gypsum-bonded investment expansion. Aust Dent Jour 1992; 37 (1 J: 43-54,
18. Myers GE. Textbook of Crown and Bridge Prosthodontics. St Louis: CV Mosby Company, 1969: 253-77.
19.
Öztürf
c B. Protez Ders Notlan. Bölüm 3, Bornova, 1986: 13-47,
20.
Poyrazoğl
u E. Döküm Yöntemlerinin ve Revetmanlann Döküm Strüktürüne Etkileri Üzerine Araştırmalar. Doçentlik Tezi. İstanbul, 1977.
21. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. St Louis: CV Mosby, 1988: 360-79.
22- Shillingburg HT. Conservative preparations for cast restorations. Dent Clin North Am 1976; 20 (2): 259-71.
23. Shiilingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. Second ed. Chicago. Quintessence Publishing Co, 1981:343-62.
24. Vieira DF, Carvalho JA. Hygroscopic expansion in the upper and lower parts of the casting ring. J Prosthet Dent 1976; 36 (2): 181-5.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com