ACARA. (2014). F-10 Curriculum / Science Learning Area. Retrieved
on 12-August-2014, at URL:
http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/science
Afonso, A. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2010) Pseudo‐science: A meaningful
context for assessing nature of science, International Journal of
Science Education, 32(3), 329-348.
Allchin, D. (2004). Pseudohistory and Pseudoscience, Science &
Education, 13, 179-195.
Beyerstein, B. L. (1996). Distinguishing Science from Pseudoscience.
Retrieved on 16-August-2014, at URL:
http://www.sfu.ca/~beyerste/research/articles/02SciencevsPseudoscienc
e
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and
the culture of learning, Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005). Anket geliştirme. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri
Dergisi, 3(2), 133-148.
Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving Scientific Literacy: From Purposes to
Practice. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific Literacy: Another Look at Its
Historical and Contemporary Meanings and Its Relationship to
Science Education Reform, Journal of Research in Science
Teaching. 37(6), 582- 601.
Dori, Y.J., Tal, R., & Tsaushu, M. (2003). Teaching biotechnology
through case studies: Can we improve higher-order thinking
skills of non-science majors?, Science Education, 87, 767–793.
Erduran, S. (1995). Science or Pseudoscience: Does Science Education
Demarcate? The Case of Chemistry and Alchemy in Teaching.
Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(2015) 446-476 472
The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research
Association, SanFrancisco.
Genovese, J. E. C. (2005). Paranormal beliefs, schizotypy, and thinking
styles among teachers and future teachers, Personality and
Individual Differences, 39 (1), 93-102.
Herrington, J. & Oliver, R. (1995). Critical characteristics of situated
learning: implications for the instructional design of multimedia.
ASCILITE 1995 Conference, University of Melbourne,
Melbourne.
Hodson, D. (2003) Time for action: Science education for an alternative
future, International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645-
670.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education
for enhancing scientific literacy, International Journal of
Science Education, 29(11), 1347-1362.
Kılıç, E. (2004). Durumlu öğrenme kuramının eğitimdeki yeri ve önemi,
Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(3), 307-320.
Klassen, J. S. (2002). "A Theoretical Framework for the Incorporation
of History in Science Education". Unpublished doctoral
dissertation. The University of Manitoba, Faculty of Education.
Laugksch, R. (2000). “Scientific Literacy: A conceptual Overview”,
Science Education, 84(1), 71–94.
Lederman, N. & Niess, M.. (1998). “Survival Of The Fittest”, School
Science and Mathematics, 4(98), 169–172.
Leonard, M. J. (2004). Toward epistemologically authentic engineering
design activities in the science classroom. National Association
for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, B.C.
Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J. V. & Lohr, J. M. (2012). Science and
Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology. Newyork: Guilford Press.
Linnenbrink, E. A. & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler
for academic success, School Psychology Review, 31 (3), 313-
327.
Lundström, M. (2007). Students Beliefs In Pseudoscience. European
Science Education Research Association Conference (ESERA),
Malmö: Sweden.
Ertan ÇETİNKAYA-Halil TURGUT-M. KurşadDURU-Serhat ERCAN 473
Martin, M. (1994). Pseudoscience, the paranormal, and the science
education, Science & Education, 3, 357-371.
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and
Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge.
McFarlane, D. A. (2013). Understanding the challenges of science
education in the 21st century: new opportunities for scientific
literacy. International Letters of Social and Humanistic
Sciences, 4, 35-44.
McLean, C. P. & Miller N. A. (2010). Changes in Critical Thinking
Skills Following a Course on Science and Pseudoscience: A
Quasi-Experimental Study, Teaching of Psychology, 37 (2), 85-
90.
Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific Literacy: A Conceptual and Empirical
Review, Daedalus, 112(2), 29 - 48.
MEB. (2006). İlköğretim Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi (6., 7. ve 8. Sınıflar)
Öğretim Programı. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
NRC. (1996). National Science Education Standarts. Washington, D.
C.. National Academy Press.
NSTA. (1982). Science-technology-society: Science education for the
1980s. Washington, D.C.
Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of
argumentation in the pedagogy of school science, International
Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576.
Nickell, D. S. (1992). "The Pseudoscientific beliefs of high school
students". Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University
School of Education, Indiana
Pella, M. O., O’Hearn, G. T. & Gale, C. G. (1966). Referents to
scientific literacy, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4,
199– 208
Pena, A. & Paco, O. (2004). Attitudes and Views of Medical Students
toward Science and Pseudoscience, Medical Education Online, 9
(4), 1-7.
Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1994). Bibliography: Students’ Alternative
Frameworks and Science Education, (4th Ed.). Kiel: Germany.
Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(2015) 446-476 474
Preece, P. F., & Baxter, J. H. (2000). Scepticism and gullibility: The
superstitious and pseudoscientific beliefs of secondary school
students, International Journal of Science Education, 22(11),
1147–1156.
Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: socioscientific
issues as contexts for practice, Studies in Science
Education, 45 (1), 1-42.
Siegel, S. (1957). Nonparametric Statistics, The American Statistician,
11(3), 13-19.
Turgut, H. (2005). "Yapılandırmacı Tasarım Uygulamasının Fen Bilgisi
Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilimsel Okuryazarlık Yeterliklerinden
“Bilimin Doğası” ve “Bilim-Teknoloji-Toplum İlişkisi”
Boyutlarının Gelişimine Etkisi". Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi,
Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul
Turgut, H. (2007). Herkes İçin Bilimsel Okuryazarlık, Ankara
Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(2), 233-256.
Turgut, H., Akçay, H. ve İrez, S. (2010). Bilim sözde - bilim ayrımı
tartışmasının öğretmen adaylarının bilimin doğası inanışlarına
etkisi, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 10 (4), 2621-
2663.
Yager, S.O., Lim, G., & Yager, R. (2006). The advantages of an STS
approach over a typical textbook dominated approach in middle
school science, School Science and Mathematics, 106, 248–260.
Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma
Yöntemleri. Güncelleştirilmiş ve Genişletilmiş 5. Baskı. Ankara:
Seçkin Yayıncılık
Zeidler, D. L. & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: theory
and practice, Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21 (2),
49-58
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com