You are here

Home » Content

Ortaokullarda Akıllı Tahta Kullanımının Öğretim ve Öğrenimi Geliştirmede Öğretmen ve Öğrenci Görüşleri

Teachers and Students Views on the use of IWBs in Secondary Schools for Enhancing Classroom Teaching and Learning

Journal Name:

  • Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2016
DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.14582/DUZGEF.1798

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study was on teachers and students’ views on the use of Interactive Whiteboards (IWBs) for enhancing classroom teaching and learning in the secondary schools’ teachers and students in 6th grades. The study includes 392 sixth grade students in 14 primary schools and 142 teachers (sciences, mathematics and English) teaching sixth grades in 18 primary schools from different classes in the city of Istanbul. Quantitative research method design was conducted as well as survey method. The questionnaire administered to teachers and students involved 19 closed questions (Yes/No) and 23 Likert-type questionnaire were used to collect data on the IWB use for classrooms teaching and learning. Mean score of 19 closed items were 73.65. Of 23 items, mean scores of 3,6 items were higher than 3.00 and only two items were lower than 3.00. Reliability for Likert-type items is excellent (0.91). The results of the study show that IWB use contributes to teaching and learning.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma, ortaokul 6. sınıflarda öğretimi ve öğrenimi iyileştirmek için akıllı tahta (IWBs) kullanımı hakkında öğretmen ve öğrenci görüşleri üzerinedir. Çalışmaya, 6. sınıflarda 18 ortaokulda (142) fen, matematik ve Ingilizce öğretmeni ve 14 ortaokulda (392) altıncı sınıf öğrencisinin katılımı ile Istanbul’da farklı okullarda yapılmıştır. Çalışmada, nitel araştırma metodu kullanılmıştır. Araştırmadaki soruların 19 tanesi kapalı (Evet / Hayır) ve 23 tanesi Likert-tipidir. Elde edilen skorlar göstermiştir ki; 11 sorunun ortalaması ellinin 73.65 üzerindedir. Sadece 2 sorunun ortalaması 3’ün altındadır. Likert-tipi soruların güvenirlik katsayıları mükemmel (α=0.91) olarak bulunmuştur. Sonuçlar göstermiştir ki, IWB kullanımı öğretim ve öğrenime katkı sağlamaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ortaokullarda-akilli-tahta-kullaniminin-ogretim-ogrenimi-gelistirmede-ogretmen-ogrenci-gorusleri.pdf
  • 1
374
386
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Shenton, A., & Padgett, L. (2007). From "bored" to screen: the use of the interactive white board for
literacy in six primary classrooms in England. Literacy, 41(3):129-136.
Akkoyunlu, B., & Baskan, G. (2015). School Principals’ Opinions on the FATIH Project in Turkey.
Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences , 174, 1497-1502.
Ardichvili, A. (2008). Learning and knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice: Motivators,
barriers, and enablers. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10 (4): 541-554.
Armstrong, V., Barnes, S., Sutherland, R., Curran, S., Mills, S., & Thompson, I. (2005). Collaborative
research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: The use of interactive whiteboard
technology. Educational Review, 57(4): 457–469.
Balta, N., & Duran, M. (2015). Attitudes of Students and Teachers towards the Use of Interactive
Whiteboards in Elementary and Secondary School Classrooms. TOJET: The Turkish Online
Journal of Educational Technology, 14 ( 2), 1-23.
Beauchamp, G., & Parkinson, J. (2005). Beyond the ‘wow’ factor: developing interactivity with the
Interactive whiteboard. School Science Review, 86 (3): 97-103.
Becta. (2006). Teaching Interactively with Electronic Whiteboards in the Primary Phase. Retrieved
October 18, 2009 from httppublications. becta. org.ukdisplay. cfmres ID=25918.
Becta. (2008). Harnessing technology: Schools survey, 1-250, http://www.becta.org.uk
Beeland, W.D. (2003). Student Engagement, Visual Learning and Technology: Can Interactive
Whiteboards Help? Retrieved April 18, 2003, from the University of New Castle website:
http://plato75.ncl.ac.uk/beeland.pdf
Betcher, C., & Lee, M. (2009). The interactive whiteboard revolution–Teaching with IWBs. Victoria, Australia:
ACER Press. schoolnet.org.za/CoL/../iwb_revolution
Cakiroglu, O. (2015). Teachers’ views on the use of Interactive Whiteboards in Secondary Schools.
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(2), 251-259.
Celik, S. (2012). Competency Levels of Teachers in Using Interactive Whiteboards. Contemporary
Educational Technology, 3 (2): 115-129
Cintia, L., Gheorghiu, I., & Colibaba C.A. (2014). Stimulating Students ‘Motivation to Learn Science.
Practical Application of Science, 2 (3), 251-256
Cogill, J. (2002). How is interactive whiteboard being used in the primary school and how does it affect
teachers and teaching. Retrieved November 6, 2009, from
www.virtuallearning.org.uk/whiteboards/IFS_Interactive_whiteboards_in_th....
Omer ÇAKIROĞLU
Year/Yıl 2016, Issue/Sayı 29, 395-407.
405
Digregorio, P., & Sobel-Lojeski, K. (2010). The Effect of IWBs on Students Performance and
Learning: A Literature Review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 38 (3): 255-312.
Dogan, D., Cınar, M., & Seferoglu, S. S. (2016). “One Laptop per Child” projects and FATIH project:
A comparative examination. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 3(1), 1-26).
Emron, S., & Dhindsa, H. S. (2010). Integration of Interactive Whiteboard Technology to Improve
Secondary Science Teaching and Learning. International Journal for Research in Education, 28.
European Commission; Survey of Schools: ICT in Education, Final Study Report. (2013).

Georgieva, K., Stoykova, V., Ivanova, N., & Dimova, E. (2015). Application of Information Technologies
and Interactions Tools for Improving Educational Quality. CBU International Conference Proceedings, 3,
468-474.
Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W.A.W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT
integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 1(2), 175-191.
Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2005). The interactive whiteboard: A literature
Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(2), 155-170.
Hall, R. (2011). Interactive White Boards: Changing Students’ Attitudes about Science. Leadership
Research, 28(1).
Hartsell, T., Herron, S. S., Fang, H., & Rathod, A. (2010). Improving teachers’ self-Confidence in
Learning Technology Communication. Technology Education, 6(2), 47-6.
Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2010). (Eds) Research into School Teaching and Learning with Whole
Class Interactive Technologies. Technology, Pedagogy and Education (Special Edition), 19 (2), 127-131.
Jankowska, M., & Atlay, M. (2008). Use of creative space in enhancing students’ engagement.Innovations in
Education and Teaching International, 45(3), 271-279.
Khan, S., Meyers, E., Gowen, E., & Bergman, K. (2014). Online information seeking and knowledge
sharing practices of science teachers. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology,
51 (1), 1-4 . DOI: 10.1002/meet.2014.14505101125
Karsenti, T. (2016). The Interactive Whiteboard (IWB): Uses, Benefits, and Challenges. Library and
Archives Canada, ISBN: 978-2-923808-52-9 February 2016. iwb.crifpe.ca/files/Rapport.pdf
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3048.6169
Kayak, S. & Kır, E. (2015). Evaluation of candidate language teachers’ level of knowledge and ideas
towards the use of interactive whiteboard. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 3(5), 33-60.
Kilic, E., Guler, C., Celik, H. E.,& Tatli, C. (2015). Learning with interactive whiteboards: Determining
the factors on promoting ıwbs to students by Technology Acceptance Model. Interactive
Technology and Smart Education, 12, 4, 285–297. Doi.org/10.1108/TTSE-05-2015-0011
Kristin, Y., & Lynn, C. (2011). Interactive Whiteboards: A Tool for Enhancing Teaching and
Learning. National Teacher Education Journal, 4 (2), 81-86.
Kurt, A. A., Kuzu, A., Dursun, O.O., Gulpinar, F., & Gultekin, M. (2013). Pilot Evaluation of
Implementation Process of the Fatih Project: Teachers' Views. Journal of Instructional Technologies &
Teacher Education, 2(1),1-23.
Liang, T.H., Huang, Y.M., & Tsai, C.C. (2012). An Investigation of Teaching and Learning Interaction
Factors for the Use of the Interactive Whiteboard Technology. Educational Technology &Society, 15
(4), 356–367
Omer ÇAKIROĞLU
Year/Yıl 2016, Issue/Sayı 29, 374-386.
406
Littleton, K. (2010). Research into teaching with whole-class interactive echnologies: Emergent
themes. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19 (2),285-292.
López, O. S. (2010). The Digital Learning Classroom: Improving English Language Learners' Academic
success in mathematics and reading using interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education,
54(4), 901-915.
Manny-Ikan, E., Dagan, O., Mada, K. (2011). Using the Interactive White Board in Teaching and
Learning An Evaluation of the Smart Classroom. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and
Learning Objects, 7, 249-271.
Mathews-Aydinli, M. J., & Elaziz, F. (2010). Turkish students' and teachers' attitudes toward the use of
IWBs in EFL classrooms. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 235 252
Mavers, D. (2009). Teaching and learning with a visualizer in the primary classroom: modelling graph
making. Learning, Media and Technology, 34 ( 1), 11-26
Mercer, N., Warwick, P., Keshner, R., & Staarman, J.K. (2010). Can the interactive whiteboard help to
provide ‘dialogic space’ for children's collaborative activity? Language and Education, 24 (5), 367-384.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500781003642460
Morgan, G. L. (2008). Improving Student Engagement: Use of the Interactive Whiteboard as an
Instructional Tool to Improve Engagement and Behavior in the Junior High School Classroom.
Doctoral Dissertations and Projects. Paper 121. http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/121
Pour, M. G. (2013). The Role of Interactive Whiteboards (IWB) in Education. Acme International
Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(4):1-6
Private Communication
Rule, A.C., Stefanich, G.P., Boody, R.M., & Peiffer, B. (2011). Impact of Adaptive Materials on Teachers
and their Students with Visual Impairments in Secondary Science and Mathematics Classes.
International Journal of Science Education, 33 (6), 865-887.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.506619
Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal
consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 99-103
Swan, K., & van ‘t Hooft, M. (2012). IWBs and student achievement: A question of Use. Ricerc Azion,
4(2), 257-266.
Tertemiz, N., Sahin, D., Can, B., & Duzgun, S. (2015). Views of Primary School Teachers and
Students about The Interactive Whiteboard. Procedia- Social and Behavioural Sciences, 186, 1289–1295.
doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.099
Tirotta, T., Torff, B., &Tirotta, R. (2010). Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary
students’ self-reported motivation in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54, 379–383.
Tomei, L.A. (2013). Top 10 Technologies for Designing 21st Century Instruction. International Journal of
Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 9(3), 80-93.
DOI: 10.4018/jicte.2013070106
Tunaboylu, C., & Demir, E. (2016). The Effect of Teaching Supported by IWB on Students’
Mathematical Achievements in Lower Secondary Education. Journal of Education and Learning, 6
(1), 81-94. doi:10.5539/jel. v6n1p81
Turel, Y. K., & Johnson, T. E. (2012). Teachers’ Belief and Use of Interactive Whiteboards for
Teaching and Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 15 (1), 381–394.
Omer ÇAKIROĞLU
Year/Yıl 2016, Issue/Sayı 29, 395-407.
407
Xu, H. L., & Moloney, R. (2011). “It Makes the Whole Learning Experience Better”: Student
Feedback on the Use of the Interactive Whiteboard in Learning Chinese at Tertiary Level. Asian
Social Science, 7(11), 119-133. doi:10.5539/ass.v7n11p20
Wood, R., & Ashfield, J. (2008). The use of the IWB for creative teaching and learning in literacy and
mathematics: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 84-96.
Yang, J.Y., & Teng, Y.W. (2014). Perceptions of Elementary School Teachers and Students Using
IWBs in English Teaching and Learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 25 (1), 1-29.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com