You are here

Home » Content

PETROL HİDROKARBONLARI İLE KİRLENMİŞ DOĞAL TOPRAĞIN ELEKTROKİNETİK YÖNTEMLE ARITIMI

TREATMENT OF PETROLEUM HYDROCRBONS CONTAMINATED NATURAL SOIL BY ELECTROKINETIC METHOD

Journal Name:

  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Remediation studies were conducted to determine the effectiveness of electrokinetic method on the treatment of natural soil contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons, in laboratory scale reactors. Electokinetic remediation of agricultural soil with an initial TPHs concentration of 10000 ppm was investigated under 20 V or 40 V electrical potential by using distilled water as electrolyte solution, treatment efficiencies between 55.2 and 95.6 % were observed according to the distance from the anode chamber and the applied electrical potential. The effect level of electrokinetic remediation on 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which were announced by EPA as in high toxicity group and present in engine oil that was used as contaminant, was also included in the framework of the study. Similar with the findings with TPHs, it was observed that PAHs treatment efficiencies were between 73.9 and 87.8% according to the distance from the anode and the electrical potential applied to the system.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Elektrokinetik yöntemin petrol hidrokarbonları ile kirletilmiş doğal toprağın arıtımındaki etkinliğinin belirlenmesi amacıyla laboratuvar ölçekli reaktörlerde arıtım çalışmaları yürütülmüştür. Başlangıç Toplam Petrol Hidrokarbonları (TPH) derişimi 10000 ppm olan tarım toprağının 20 V ve 40 V elektrik potansiyeli altında, elektroliz sıvısı olarak saf su kullanılarak elektrokinetik arıtımı araştırılmış, anottan olan mesafeye ve uygulanan elektrik potansiyeline bağlı olarak % 55.2 ila % 95.6 arasında giderim verimleri elde edilmiştir. Çalışma kapsamında, kirletici olarak kullanılan motor yağı içinde bulunan ve EPA tarafından yüksek toksisite grubunda olduğu belirtilen onaltı adet çokhalkalı aromatik hidrokarbonun (PAH) elektrokinetik arıtımdan etkilenme seviyeleri de incelenmiştir. TPH bulgularına benzer şekilde, PAH arıtım verimleri de anottan olan mesafeye ve uygulanan elektrik potansiyeline bağlı olarak %73.9 ve % 87.8 olarak belirlenmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_31877_12_pp_1-16.pdf
  • 2
1-16
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Acar, Y.B., Alshawabkeh, A.N., (1993) Principles of Electrokinetic Remediation,
Environmental Sciences and Technology 27(13), 2638-2647.
Alcántara, M.T., Gómez, J., Pazos, M., Sanromán, M.A. (2008) Combined treatment of PAHs
contaminated soils using the sequence extraction with surfactant electrochemical degradation.
Chemosphere 70, 1438-1444.
Alcántara, M.T., Gómez, J., Pazos, M., Sanromán, M.A. (2009) PAHs soil decontamination in
two steps: Desorption and electrochemical treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials 166,
462-468.
Altin, A., Degirmenci, M., (2005) Lead (II) removal from natural soils by enhanced
electrokinetic remediation. Science of the Total Environment 337, 1- 10.
Altınbaş Ü., Çengel M.,Uysal H., Okur B., Okur N., Kurucu Y., Delibacak S., “Toprak Bilimi”
İzmir, Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No:557 355s.
ASTM D422 - 63(2007) Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils
Chang, J.H., Liao, Y.C., (2006) The effect of critical operational parameters on the circulation
-enhanced electrokinetics. Journal of Hazardous Materials B 129, 186-193.
Chung, H.I., Kamon,M. (2005) Ultrasonically enhanced electrokinetic remediation for removal
of Pb and phenanthrene in contaminated soils. Engineering Geology 77, 233-242.
Haapea, P., Tuhkanen, T., (2006) Integrated treatment of PAH contaminated soil by soil
washing ozonation and biological treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials B136, 244–250.
Huang, J.W.W., Chen, J.J., Berti, W.R., Cunningham, S.D., (1997), "Phytoremediation of
lead-contaminated soils: Role of synthetic chelates in lead phytoextraction" Environmental
Science Technology, Vol 31, 800-805.
Huang, X.D., El-Alawi, Y., Gurska, J., Glick, B.R. Greenberg,B.M. (2005) A multi-process
phytoremediation system for decontamination of persistent total petroleum hydrocarbons
(TPHs) from soils. Microchemical Journal 81, 139-147.
Johnson, D.L., Anderson, D.R., McGrath, S.P., (2005) Soil microbial response during the
phytoremediation of a PAH contaminated soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37, 2334–2336.
Kim, D.H., Jeon, C.S., Baek, K., Ko, S.H., Yang, J.S. (2009) Electrokinetic remediation of
fluorine-contaminated soil: Conditioning of anolyte. Journal of Hazardous Materials 161, 565-
569.
Kim, D.H., Ryu, B.G., Park, S.W., Seo, C.I., Baek, K., (2009) Electrokinetic remediation of
Zn and Ni-contaminated soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials 165, 501-505.
Kos, B., Lestan, D., (2004) "Chelator induced phytoextraction and in situ soil washing of Cu."
Environmental Pollution, Vol 132, 333-339.
Li, Z., Yu, J.W., Neretnieks, I., (1997) Removal of Pb( II), Cd( II) and Cr( III) from sand
by electromigration. Journal of Hazardous Materials 55, 295-304.
Mulligan, C.N., Yong, R.N., Gibbs, B.F., (2001) "Surfactantenhanced remediation of
contaminated soil: a review", Engineering Geololgy, Vol 60, 371-380.
Palmer,C.D., Fish,W., and Keely, J.F., (1988) Inorganic Contaminants: "Recognizing the
problem." In: Proc.2nd Nat. OutdoorAction Conf. on Aquifer Restoration, Groundwater
Monitoring and GeophysicalMethods, National Water Well Association, Dublin, OH,pp. 555-
579.
Pathak, H., Kantharia, D., Malpani, A., Madamwar,D., (2009) Naphthalene degradation by
Pseudomonas sp. HOB1: In vitro studies and assessment of naphthalene degradation efficiency
in simulated microcosms. Journal of Hazardous Materials 166 (2009) 1466–1473.
Rivas, J., Gimeno, O., Calle, R.G., Portela, J.R., Ossa, E.M., (2009) Remediation of PAH
spiked soils: Concentrated H2O2 treatment/continuous hot water extraction–oxidation. Journal
of Hazardous Materials 168, 1359–1365.
Saichek, E.R., Reddy, K.R, (2003) Effect of pH control at the anode for the electrokinetic
removal of phenanthrene from kaolin soil. Chemosphere 51, 273-287.
Salt, D.E., Blaylock, M., Kumar, N.P.B.A., Dushenkov, V.,Ensley, B.D., Chet, I., Raskin, I.,
(1995) "Phytoremediation-A novel strategy for the removal of toxic metals from the
environment using plants". Bio-Technology, Vol 13, 468-474.
Saponaro, S., Bonomo, L., Petruzzellı, G., Romele, L., Barbafıerı, M., (2002) Polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (pahs) slurry phase bioremediation of a manufacturing gas plant (mgp)
site aged soil. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 135, 219-236.
Shen, Z., Chen, X., Jia, J.,Qu, L., Wang, W., (2007) Comparison of electrokinetic soil
remediation methods using one fixed anode and approaching anodes. Environmental Pollution
150, 193-199.
Şirin, G. (1998) The Removal of Tricholoroethylene From Soil By Supercritical Fluid
Extraction, PhD Thesis, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.
Tran, L.H., Drogui, P., Mercier, G., Blais,J.F., (2009) Coupling extraction-flotation with
surfactant and electrochemical degradation for the treatment of PAH contaminated hazardous
wastes. Journal of Hazardous Materials 170, 1218-1226.
USEPA Method 3550 B (1996)Ultrasonic Extraction, Revision 2, Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com