You are here

Home » Content

Hukuk ve Ekonominin Ortak Temelleri-‘Hukuk ve Ekonomi’ Akımı

Common Platform of Law and Economics – “Law and Economics” Trend

Journal Name:

  • Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2008

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This paper is trying to illustrate why economic analysis is important for lawyers, judges and legal scholars, and how legal rules structure economic activity. In many respects, the economy and the law are interdependent and synergistic. This relationship is brought to light by ‘law and economics’ movement. The history of the discipline now known as “law and economics” goes back hundreds of years. Indeed, ‘law and economics’ is a success story of interdisciplinary scholarship, and the success has been attributed to the strength of economics in providing a sound behavioral theory. It is argued in this paper, however, that this is only a partial explanation, for many issues in law are not directly related to human behavior per se. As such, in analyzing these issues, the legal economists rely mainly on the analytical logic of economic analysis.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makale, hukuk kuralları tarafından ekonomik aktivitelerin nasıl sekillendirildiğini ve ekonomik analizin hukuk bilimciler, yargıçlar ve hukukçular açısından niçin önemli olduğunu göstermeye çalısıyor. Birçok açıdan hukuk ve ekonomi birbiriyle bağımlı ve es etkililik içindedir. Bu iliski ‘hukuk ve ekonomi’ hareketi tarafından ortaya çıkarılmıstır. ‘Hukuk ve ekonomi’ disiplinin tarihi yüzyıllar öncesine kadar gider. Aslında “hukuk ve ekonomi’ disiplinler arası bilimin basarı öyküsü olup bu basarı ekonominin sağlam bir davranıssal teori olusturmadaki gücüne atfedilir. Bu makalede ise bunun sadece kısmi bir açıklama olduğu savunulur çünkü hukuktaki pek çok problem doğrudan insan davranısının yalnızca kendisiyle ilgili değildir. Bu nedenle, söz konusu sorunları veya hukuksal uyusmazlıkları incelerken hukuk ekonomistleri daha çok ekonomik analizin analitik mantığına itimat ederler.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-hukuk-ekonominin-ortak-temelleri-hukuk-ekonomi-akimi.pdf
  • 20
161-180
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Akad, A.S., (2006), “Hukuk ve Ahlak”, Vatan Gazetesi, 16.03.2006.
Baker, J.B. (1999). “Developments in Antitrust Economics”, Journal of
Economic Perspectives, Vol: 13, No: 1, s: 181-194.
Baker, J.B. (1997). “Econometric Analysis in FTC vs. Staples”,
www.ftc.gov/speeches/other/stspch.htm (20.01.2007)
Baker, J.B. (1996). “Contemporary Empirical Merger Analysis”, Working
Paper, www.ftc.gov/speeches/other/gmu5.htm (23.12.2006)
Becker, G.S. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Berolzheimer, F. (1968). The World’s Legal Philosophies, Reprint, South
Hackensack, N.J.: Rothman Reprint.
Bork, R. H. (1978). The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself, New
York, Basic Books.
Calabresi, G. (1970). The Cost of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis,
Yale University Press.
Coase, R.H. (1994) Essays on Economics and Economists. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press.
Coase, R.H. (1988) The Firm, the Market, and the Law. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Coase, R.H. (1960). “The problem of social cost”, Journal of Law and
Economics, 3(1), 1-44.
Cole, D.H. ve Grossman, P.Z. (2004). Principles of Law and Economics, New
Jersey, Pearson-Prentice Hall.
Cooke, C.A. (1937). “The Legal Content of the Profit Concept”, Yale Law
Journal (46), ss: 436-437, aktarım T.E.C. Leslie, Essay in Political and Moral
Philosophy, 1879, s. 404.
Cooter, R.D. and Rubinfeld, D.L. (1989). “Economic analysis of legal disputes
and their resolution”, Journal of Economic Literature, 27, 1067-97.
Cooter, R.D. and Ulen, T. (2003). Law and Economics. 4nd ed., Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley.
Easterbrook, F.H. (1984). The Supreme Court, 1983 Term---Foreword: the court
and the economic system. Harvard Law Review, 98, 4-60.
Evensky, J. (1994). Professor Malloy, Judge Posner, and Adam Smith’s moral
philosophy. in Robin P. Malloy and Jerry Evensky eds., Adam Smith and the
Philosophy of Law and Economics, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Holmes, O.W. (1897) “The Path of the Law”, Harvard Law Review, Vol.: 10,
1897, s. 457-469.
Hsiung, B., (2004) “An interpretation of Ronald Coase’s analytical approach”,
History of Economics Review, 39, 12-32.
Đmregün, O. (1991). Kara Ticareti Hukuku Dersleri, Dokuzuncu Bası, Đstanbul, Gür-ay
Matbaası.
Jasquemin, A. ve Schrans, G. (1970) le Droit Economique, Paris, Press
Universitaires de France.
Kumcu, E. (2004), “Rekabet Üzerine Çesitlemeler”, Hürriyet Gazetesi, 30.05.2004
Landes, W.M. and Posner, R.A. (1988) The Economic Structure of Tort Law.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Malloy, R.P. (1990). Law and Economics: A Comparative Approach to Theory
and Practice. St. Paul, MN: West Pusblishing.
Mercuro, N. and Medema, S.G. (2006). Economics and the Law (From Posner to
Postmodernism and Beyond), Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton UniversityPress.
Mimaroğlu, S.K. (1973). “Ekonomi Hukuku, Ticaret Hukuku ve Đsletme Hukuku
Kavramlarında Yeni Gelismeler”, Prof.Dr. Kemal Fikret Arık’a Armağan,
Ankara, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF ve TODAĐE Yayını.
Posner, R. A. (2003). Economic Analysis of Law. 6th ed., New York: Aspen
Publishers
Posner, R. A. (1996). The Federal Courts: Challenge and Reform, Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
Posner, R. A. (1990). The Problems of Jurisprudence, Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Posner, R. A. (1987a). “The law and economics movement”, American
Economic Review, 75(2), 1-14.
Posner, R. A. (1987b). “The decline of law as an autonomous discipline: 1962-
1987”, Harvard Law Review, 100, 761-80.
Posner, R. A. (1979). “Some uses and abuses of economics in law”, University
of Chicago Law Review, 46(2), 281-306.
Posner, R.A. and Parisi, F. (1997). Law and economics: an introduction. in
Richard A. Posner and Francesco Parisi eds., Law and Economics. Vol. I-III,
Cheltenham, UK and Lyme, N.H.: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Shapiro, F. R. (1996). “The most-cited law review articles revisited”, Chicago-
Kent Law Review, 71, 751-79.
Shavell, S. (1988). Economic analysis of accident law, Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Sirel, E. (2001). “Rekabet Hukuku Uygulamalarında Ekonomik Analiz”,
Rekabet Kurumu Persemde Konferansları, Ankara, Rekabet Kurumu
Yayını, Nisan 2001.
Thompson, J. S. (1998). “Empirical Methods in Antitrust Economics:A Survey
and New Techniques”, Auburn University, Yayınlanmamıs doktora tezi
Türkkan, E. (2001). Đkinci En Đyi, Ankara, Liberte Yayınları.
Ulen, T.S. (1998). Law and economics: settled issues and open questions. In
Nicholas Mercuro ed. Law and Economics, Boston: Kluwer Academic
Publisher.
Ulen, T.S. (1997). Firmly grounded: economics in the future of the law.
Wisconsin Law Review, 3, 433-63.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com