You are here

Home » Content

Ortaöğretim Öğretmenlerinin Örgütsel Güven Algıları

Secondary School Teachers’ Perceptions Regarding Organizational Trust

Journal Name:

  • Ege Ünivesitesi Ege Eğitim Dergisi/Ege Eğitim Online

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study was to determine the extent of the organizational trust in secondary schools located in Malatya city center according to the opinions of teachers. Research instrument used in this study, entitled as “Omnibus T Scale”, was developed by Hoy & Tschannen-Moran (2003). After validity and reliability studies, a Turkish version of the instrument was conducted on a total number of 236 secondary school teachers (F=82, M=154). The results showed that, secondary school teachers perceive organizational trust levels in their schools as moderate. Results also indicated that, as teacher population in school increase organizational trust level decrease and compared to the other school types teachers from Anatolian High Schools and Science High Schools perceive their schools’ organizational trust more positive.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırma ile Malatya ili, merkez ilçe sınırları içerisindeki ortaöğretim kurumlarında görev yapmakta olan öğretmenlerin, çalıştıkları okullara ilişkin örgütsel güven algılarının ne düzeyde olduğunun belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak, Hoy ve Tschannen-Moran (2003) tarafından geliştirilen ve öğretmenlerin okullardaki örgütsel güven düzeyini nasıl algıladıklarını betimlemeyi amaçlayan “Çok Amaçlı T Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Türkçeye uyarlanan, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları yapılan ölçek; 82’si kadın, 154’ü erkek olmak üzere toplam 236 öğretmene uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler üzerinde yapılan analizler sonucunda, araştırmaya katılan öğretmenlerin çalıştıkları liselerde örgütsel güveni “orta” düzeyde algıladıkları belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca araştırma sonucunda liselerdeki öğretmen sayısı arttıkça meslektaşlara duyulan güven düzeyinin düştüğü, Anadolu ve fen liselerinde görevli öğretmenlerin, diğer liselerdeki öğretmenlere göre örgütsel güven düzeyini daha olumlu algıladıkları belirlenmiştir
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ortaogretim-ogretmenlerinin-orgutsel-guven-algilari.pdf
  • 7
103-124
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Arı, G. S. (2003). Yöneticiye duyulan güven örgütsel bağlılığı artırır mı? Gazi
2. Üniversitesi Ticaret ve Turizm Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), 17–36.
3. Baier, A. C. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96, 231–260.
4. Brewster, C., ve Railsback, J. (2003). Building trusting relationships for school
5. improvement: Implications for principals and teachers. Northwest Regional
6. Educational Laboratory. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service Number: ED 481
7. 987)
8. Bryk A. S. ve Schneider, B. (1996). Social trust: A moral resource of school improvement.
9. Chicago: University of Chicago, Department for School Improvement.
10. Bryk, A. S., Lee, V. E., ve Holland, P.B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good.
11. Cambridge, M.A: Harvard University Press.
12. Bryk, A. S., ve Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement.
13. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
14. Butler, J. K. (1991). Towards understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution
15. of a conditions of trust inventory. Journal of Management, 17, 643-663.
16. Carnavale, D. G. and B. Wechsler. (1992). Trust in the public sector. Administration And
17. Society. 23: 471–494.
18. Ceyanes, J. W. (2004). An analysis between teacher trust in the principal and teacher
19. burnout as identified by teachers in selected Texas public schools. (Unpublished
20. Doctoral Dissertation). College Station, Texas: Texas A&M University.
21. Deluga, R. J. (1994). Supervisor trust building, leader-member exchange and
22. organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational
23. Psychology, 67 (4), 315.
24. Demircan, N., A. Ceylan. (2003). Örgütsel güven kavramı: nedenleri ve sonuçları.
25. Yönetim ve Ekonomi. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 10(2), 139–150.
26. Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(4), 265-279.
27. Goddard, R.D., Tschannen-Moran, M., ve Hoy, W.K. (2001). The relationship of trust to
28. student achievement in urban elementary schools: A Multilevel analysis. Elementary
29. School Journal, 102(1), 3-17.
30. Griffin, K. (1967). The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of
31. interpersonal trust in the communication department. Psychological Bulletin, 68: 104-
32. 120.
33. Heimovics, R. D. (1984). Trust influence in an ambiguous group setting. Small Group
34. Behaviour. 15(4), 545-552.
35. Hoffman, J., Sabo, D., Bliss, J., & Hoy, W. K. (1994). Building a culture of trust. Journal
36. ofSchool Leadership, 4, 484-501.
37. Hoy, W. K. ve Tarter, C. J. (2004). Organizational justice in schools: no justice without
38. trust. International Journal of Educational Management.18 (4 ), 250–259
39. Hoy, W. K. ve Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical
40. confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership. 9, 184-208.
41. Hoy, W. K. ve Tschannen-Moran, M. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of
42. faculty trust in schools. Wayne K. Hoy & Cecil Miskel (Ed.). Studies in leading and
43. organizing schools (pp. 181–207).
44. Hoy, W. K., Sabo, D, & Barnes, K. (1996) Organizational health and faculty trust: A view
45. from the middle level. Research in Middle Level Education Quarterly,19, 21–39.
46. Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., ve Kottkamp, R. B. (1991). Open schools, healthy schools:
47. Measuring organizational climate. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
48. Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C.J., Witkoskie, L. (1992). Faculty trust in colleagues: Linking the
49. principal with school effectiveness. Journal of Research and Development in
50. Education, 26 (1), 38–45.
51. Kaya, A. (2005). Çocuklar için yalnızlık ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve
52. güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim Araştırmaları, 5(19), 220–237.
53. Kitapçı, H.; Çakar, N. D. ve Sezen, B. (2005). The combined effects of trust and employee
54. identification on intention to quit. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 3(12), 33–41.
55. Kratzer, C. C. (1997, March). A community of respect, caring, and trust: One school’s
56. story. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research
57. Association, Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service Number: ED 409 654)
58. Lenz, P. A. (2006). Teacher-school board member trust relationships and their perceived
59. influence on school effectiveness (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Pittsburgh,
60. PA: Duquesne University.
61. Leonard, P. E. (1999, Kasım). Do teachers value collaboration? The impact of trust. Paper
62. presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational
63. Administration, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
64. Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. New York: Basic Books.
65. McAllister, D.J. (1995). Affect and cognition based trust as foundations of interpersonal
66. cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 24–59.
67. Noteboom, B. ve Six, F. (2003). The trust process in organizations: Empirical studies of
68. the determinants and the process of trust development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward
69. Elgar Publishers.
70. Page, S. A. (2000). The organizational health of high schools and dimensions of faculty
71. trust (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Ohio: The Ohio State University
72. Reynolds, L. (1998). The trust Effect: Creating the high trust, high performance
73. organization. London, UK: Nicholas Brealey Publishing Limited.
74. Samancı, G. (2007). Örgütsel güven ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı. (Yayınlanmamış
75. Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Afyonkarahisar: Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi.
76. Sapienza, H. J., ve Korsgaard, M. A. (1996). Managing investor relations: The impact of
77. procedural justice in establishing and sustaining investor support. Academy of
78. Management Journal, 39, 544-574.
79. Short, P. M., & Greer, J. T. (1997). Leadership in empowered schools: Themes from
80. innovative efforts. Columbus: Merrill.
81. Six, F. (2005). The trouble with trust: The dynamics of Interpersonal Trust Building.
82. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
83. Tarter, C. J., Bliss, J. and Hoy, W. K. (1989). School characteristics and faculty trust in
84. secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(3), 294–308.
85. Tarter, C.J., Sabo, D., & Hoy, W. K. (1995). Middle school climate, faculty trust and
86. effectiveness: A path analysis. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29
87. (1), 41–49.
88. Taylor, R.G. (1989). The role of trust in labor-management relations. Organization
89. Development Journal, 7: 85–89.
90. Tschannen-Moran, M. (1998). Trust and collaboration in urban elementary schools
91. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Ohio: The Ohio State University.
92. Tschannen-Moran, M. (2003). Fostering organizational citizenship: Transformational
93. leadership and trust. W.K. Hoy & C.G. Miskel, (Ed.) Studies in Leading and
94. Organizing Schools (s. 157–179). Information Age Publishing: Greenwich: CT.
95. Tschannen-Moran, M. ve Goddard, R. D. (2000). The relationship of trust to teachers’
96. collective sense of efficacy. Working paper. The Ohio State University
97. Tschannen-Moran, M. ve Hoy, W. K. (1998). Trust in schools: A conceptual and empirical
98. analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4). 334-352.
99. Tschannen-Moran, M. ve Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature,
100. meaning and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4). 547-593.
101. Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S.E., Korsgaard, M.A., ve Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers as
102. initiators of trust: An Exchange relationships framework for understanding
103. managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23, 513–530
104. Yılmaz, E. (2005). Örgütsel güven ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (14), 567–580.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com