Öğrencilerin Mantıksal Düşünme Yeteneklerinin Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi

Didem Kılıç; Necdet SAĞLAM

Investigating Students’ Logical Thinking Abilities in Terms of Certain Variables

Journal Name:

Ege Ünivesitesi Ege Eğitim Dergisi/Ege Eğitim Online

Publication Year:

2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name	University of Author	Faculty of Author
Didem Kılıç	Aksaray Üniversitesi	Eğitim Fakültesi
Necdet SAĞLAM	Hacettepe Üniversitesi	Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü

Abstract (2. Language):

Logical thinking abilities have not only an important role on achievement and understanding concepts but also facilitate problem solving in daily life situations. The differences both in students’ academic achievement and problem solving in everyday life indicate that certain variables affect students’ reasoning ability. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of gender, age and school type on students’ logical thinking abilities. The research was conducted with 586 secondary school students attending three different school types and the age range of the research group students was between 16 and 19. Test of Logical Thinking (TOLT) was administered to determine students’ reasoning abilities and one-way ANOVA was conducted to analyze data. The results of the study revealed that there was statistically significant effect of gender and school type on reasoning ability. As another result of the study, age has no significant effect on students’ logical thinking ability.

Bookmark/Search this post with

Tweet Widget

Abstract (Original Language):

Öğrenci başarısında ve kavramları yapılandırmada önemli rol oynayan mantıksal düşünme yeteneği, ayrıca günlük yaşamda karşılaşılan problemlerin çözümünü de kolaylaştırmaktadır. Öğrencilerin hem akademik başarılarındaki hem de günlük hayattaki problemleri çözmedeki farklılıkları, mantıksal düşünme yeteneğini etkileyen bazı değişkenler olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışmada ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin mantıksal düşünme yeteneklerinin cinsiyet, yaş ve okul türü değişkenlerinden etkilenip etkilenmediği araştırılmıştır. Çalışmaya yaşları 16 ile 19 arasında değişen, üç farklı okul türünde öğrenim gören 586 ortaöğretim öğrencisi katılmıştır. Öğrencilerin mantıksal düşünme yeteneklerini belirlemek için “Mantıksal Düşünme Yeteneği Testi” kullanılmış ve toplanan verilerin analizi için tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA) gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada elde edilen bulgulara göre öğrencilerin mantıksal düşünme yeteneklerinin cinsiyet ve okul türüne bağlı olarak anlamlı bir şekilde farklılık gösterdiği belirlenmiştir. Yaş değişkeninin ise öğrencilerin mantıksal düşünme yeteneklerine etkisi olmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

FULL TEXT (PDF):

arastrmx_5670_10_pp_23-38.pdf

2

23-38

Turkish

REFERENCES

References:

Atay, P. D. (2006). Relative Influence of Cognitive and Motivational Variables on Genetic Concepts in Traditional and Learning Cycle Classrooms. (Yayınlanmamış
35 Ege Eğitim Dergisi 2009 (10) 2: 23-38
Doktora Tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi/Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
BouJaoude, S., Giuliano, F. J. (1991). The relationship between students' approaches to studying, formal reasoning ability, prior knowledge, and gender and their achievement in chemistry. Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, April 7-10, 1991, Lake Geneva, Fontana, WI, 29p.
Bitner, B. L. (1991). Formal Operational Reasoning Modes: Predictors of Critical Thinking Abilities and Grades Assigned by Teachers in Science and Mathematics for Students in Grades Nine Through Twelve. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28 (3), 265-274.
Bozdoğan, A. (2007). Fen bilgisi öğretiminde çalışma yaprakları ile öğretimin öğrencilerin fen bilgisi tutumuna ve mantıksal düşünme becerilerine etkisi. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Çukurova Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavioral Science. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
Demirel, Ö. (2003). Planlamadan Değerlendirmeye Öğretme Sanatı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Garnett, P. J., Tobin, K. (1984). Reasoning Patterns of Preservice Elementary and Middle School Science Teachers. Science Education, 68 (5), 621-631.
Geban, Ö., Aşkar, P. ve Özkan, İ. (1992). Effects of Computer Simulated Experiments and Problem Solving Approaches on High School Students. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 5-10.
Gerber, B. L., Marek, E. A. ve Cavallo, A. M. L. (1997). Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability. Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, March 21-24 1997, Oak Brook, IL, 13p.
Johnson, M. A., Lawson, A. E. (1998). What Are The Relative Effects of Reasoning Ability and Prior Knowledge on Biology Achievement in Expository and Inquiry Classes? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35 (1), 89-103.
Inhelder, B., Piaget, J. (1958). The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence. USA: Basic Books Inc. Publishers.
Karplus, R. (1977). Science Teaching And The Development Of Reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14 (2), 169-175.
Lawson, A. E. (1982). Formal Reasoning, Achievement, and Intelligence: An Issue of Importance. Science Education, 66 (1), 77-83.
Lawson, A. E., Thompson, L. D. (1988). Formal Reasoning Ability and Misconceptions Concerning Genetics and Natural Selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25 (9), 733-746.
Öğrencilerin Mantıksal Düşünme Yeteneklerinin Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi 36
Lawson, A. E. (1992). The Development of Reasoning Among College Biology Students- A Review of Research. Journal of College Science Teaching, 21, 338-344.
Lawson, A. E., Clark, B., Cramer-Meldrum, E., Falconer, K. A., Sequist, J. M. ve Kwon, Y. (2000). Development of Scientific Reasoning in College Biology: Do Two Levels of General Hypothesis-Testing Skills Exist? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 (1), 81-101.
Lawson, A. E., Alkhoury, S., Benford, R., Clark, B. R. ve Falconer, K. A. (2000). What Kinds of Scientific Concepts Exist? Concept Construction and Intellectual Development in College Biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 (9), 906-1018.
Lawson, A. E., Banks, D. L. ve Logvin, M. (2006). Self-Efficacy, Reasoning Ability, and Achievement in College Biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. DOI 10.1002/tea.20172.
Linn, M. C., Pulos, S. ve Gans, A. (1981). Correlates of Formal Reasoning: Content and Problem Effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18 (5), 435-447.
Oliva, J. M. (2003). The Structural Coherence of Students’ Conceptions in Mechanics and Conceptual Change. International Journal of Science Education, 25 (5), 539-561.
Seymour, J., Longden, B. (1991). Respiration – That’s Breathing Isn’t It? Journal of Biological Education, 25 (3), 177-183.
Simpson, W. D., Marek, E. A. (1988). Understandings and Misconceptions of Biology Concepts Held by Students Attending Small High Schools and Students Attending Large High Schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25 (5), 361-374.
Sungur, S., Tekkaya, C. (2003). Students’ Achievement in Human Circulatory System Unit: The Effect of Reasoning Ability and Gender. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12 (1), 59-64.
Tobin, K. G., Capie, W. (1981). The Development and Validation of A Group Test of Logical Thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 413-423.
Tobin, K. G., Capie, W. (1982). Relationships Between Formal Reasoning Ability, Locus of Control, Academic Engagement and Integrated Process Skill Achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19 (2), 113-121.
Valanides, N. C. (1996). Formal Reasoning and Science Teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 96 (2), 99-111.
Valanides, N. C. (1997). Formal Reasoning Abilities and School Achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23 (2), 169-185.
37 Ege Eğitim Dergisi 2009 (10) 2: 23-38
Williams, K. A., Cavallo, A. M. L. (1995). Reasoning Ability, Meaningful Learning, and Students’ Understanding of Physics Concepts. Journal of College Science Teaching, 24 (5), 311-314.
Yenilmez, A., Sungur, S. ve Tekkaya, C. (2005). Investigating Students’ Logical Thinking Abilities: The Effects of Gender and Grade Level. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, 219-225.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com

Tweet Widget

You are here

Öğrencilerin Mantıksal Düşünme Yeteneklerinin Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

mantıksal düşünme yeteneği

cinsiyet

Yaş

okul türü

REFERENCES

Recommended Articles

You are here

Öğrencilerin Mantıksal Düşünme Yeteneklerinin Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

mantıksal düşünme yeteneği

cinsiyet

Yaş

okul türü

REFERENCES

Login

Recommended Articles